Wednesday, October 30, 2013

How is the National Assembly Formed? -- The UNCONSTITUTIONAL ROYAL DECREE

Seen and heard on Ms. Theary C. Seng's Facebook accounts: 

("additional law to Constitution", not an amendment) 

How the current unconstitutional CCP-formed National Assembly and CCP-formed Government came to be, using the unconstitutional "additional law to the Constitution" (Royal Decree) of July 2004 that is NOT a Constitutional amendment: 

Article 3: 
If the objectives of the procedures stipulated in Articles 82 and 119-New of the Constitution cannot be achieved, the National Assembly at the request of the party that wins the most seats in the National Assembly, shall proceed with a package vote to elect a President and Vice-Presidents of the National Assembly, as well as Chairpersons and Vice-Chairpersons of the Commissions of the National Assembly and simultaneously hold a vote of confidence in the Royal Government. 

Article 5: 
The package voting shall be conducted without debate or discussion and no explanation is required after the result of the package voting is released. 

Members of the National Assembly may only vote, in favour of or against the package list submitted by the oldest Member of the National Assembly. The package voting shall be conducted by a show of hands. 

The irregularities include voting that is (i) by the sole public raising of hands (ii) with absolutely no debate allowed and (iii) in the same NA session with same unconstitutional voting process as casting the vote of confidence for the entire Government Cabinet posts. 

The Royal Decree was politically expedient but manifestly, prima facie unconstitutional, particularly in its violation of due process and “liberal multiparty democracy” principles.



Anonymous said...

Congratulation to Theary for that boyfriend she get and I wish her good luck.

Anonymous said...

Theary, please complete your studies before lecturing us.

Anonymous said...

Are they both Hollywood or Bollywood stars?

Anonymous said...

៥៥ យកមិនយក?៥៥ យកមិនយក?៥៥ យកមិនយក?

ទោះជាពួកអាអស់ឯងខំប្រឹងស្រែក ធ្វើមហាតបាតុកម្ម ឬ មហាតបាតុកម្មសូត្រធម៌,,,,, មហាតបាតុកម្មស្មូត្រ, មហាតបាតុកម្មភាវនា, មហាតបាតុកម្មសមាធិ, លុតជង្គុង ក្រាបទូល
ក្រោមល្អងធូលីព្រះបាទ, ប្តឹងទៅតុលាការ ឬ ចង់ប្តឹងទៅអង្គការសហប្រជាជាតិជាមួយការ ដង្ហែស្នាមមេដៃ ឲ្យបែកមេឃ រញ្ជួយផែនដីទៀត
ក៍ផែនដីនេះមិនទាន់ដល់វេនពួកអាអស់ឯងដែរ នៅមានឯកឧត្ដមបណ្ឌិត
ហ៊ុន ម៉ាណែត ហ៊ុន ម៉ានិត ទៀត ។ល។ និង។ល។
ផែនដីនេះមិនអាចមាន ព្រះអាទិត្យពីររះលើផែនដីតែមួយបានឡើយ។
ចេះច្បាប់បោះឆ្នោតទេ? ចេះគណិតសាស្ដ្រទេ? ៥០+១ = ១២៣/២=៦១.៥+១=៦២.៥
លេខចេញយ៉ាងច្បាស់ចាញ់ហើយ មិនព្រមចាញ់ទៀត
ត្រូវចាំណា សមេ្តចបណ្ឌិតអគ្គមហាសេនាបតីតេជោ ហ៊ុន សែន វរ្ម័នទី១ មិនមែនជាមនុស្សលោកទេ សមេ្តចជាព្រះបាទ ហ៊ុន ទៀន ចាប់ជាតិ សមេ្តចជាព្រះបាទធម្មិក សមេ្តចជាព្រះអាទិទេព សមេ្តចជាទេវតារស់មកសង្គ្រោះប្រជាជនកម្ពុជា និងប្រទេសកម្ពុជាឱ្យ សម្បូរសប្បាយ រង់រឿង និងសុខក្សេមក្សាន្ដ!!!

សមេ្តចជាព្រះអាទិត្យតែមួយ រះលើផែនដីនេះ...។
ជយោ! សមេ្តចបណ្ឌិតអគ្គមហាសេនាបតីតេជោ ហ៊ុន សែន វរ្ម័នទី១ ជាទេវតានៃកម្ពុជា!!!

បរាជ័យ! ពួកអាខ្មែរក្បត់ជាតិរត់ចោលស្រុក!

បរាជ័យពួកអាសត្វឆ្កែបរទេស (!!)

បរាជ័យពួកអាកាកសំណល់បាតសង្គម (!!)


ហ្ការី អ៊ឹង
សមាគមខ្មែរឡុងប៉ិចរដ្ឋកាលីហ្វ័រញ៉ា និងជា
បេក្ខជន ស្ថានកុងស៊ុលខ្មែរប្រចាំឡុងប៉ិចរដ្ឋកាលីហ្វ័រញ៉ា

Anonymous said...

Yes, it is no brainer that CPP violating the laws (the constitution) and runs the country Mafia style. They have been displaying this behavior since 1979.
The big question is what Khmers and Cambodians are going to do about it? Historically how do you get rid off a Mafia organization or a tyrant? Its is usally done with big govertmental effort in case of Mafia, for tyrany it is usually through wars, revolution, armed up -rising etc. Asking Doners for help? Good luck! some doner countries are begging Hun Sen for the privilege of giving money to the Cambodian goverment, a legal form of bribery! I agreed with Theary on her analysis... but I believe that it is a moot point or irrelevant simply because Hun Sen is so blatantly unconstitutional. And of course, he does not pass the laugh test!

Anonymous said...

Good points, 12:09, I'd love to see more of your analysis here and less of Theary Seng's moot and irrelevant points.

Anonymous said...

Not only Theary's 'analysis', also her photos show time and again just how far removed she is from the reality facing Cambodians. US citizenship and hanging out in posh venues sipping cocktails but pretending to be the super-victim and the Uber-Cambodian.

Pretentious and disgusting. Never gonna pass the laugh test.