Thursday, October 03, 2013

Observers Urge Decrease in US Aid, Support to New Government



"Donors are not eager to burn bridges with a party that they expect to remain in power."





By Sok Khemara, VOA Khmer

WASHINGTON DC - As a standoff over the elections and formation of Cambodia’s government continues, critics say the United States should consider decreasing aid to Cambodia and other leading donor nations should do the same.

Some observers see this year’s election as similar to the elections of 1998, which came on the heels of a coup and a grenade attack on an opposition rally and were followed by massive demonstrations and clashes with police.

John Sifton, advocacy director for Human Rights Watch, said the US should not lend for infrastructure projects until donors like the World Bank and Asian Development Bank have better safeguards in place for the poor, many of whom have been displaced in recent years by development projects.


The US could also take a leadership role in not recognizing the July elections as free or fair, and convince donors like the EU and Japan to decrease aid as well, Sifton said.

Given the fact that Hun Sen has stolen another election, it is time for the United States to start using their influence at the World Bank and ADB to push for this stuff,” he said. “Right now infrastructure lending by the World Bank and ADB can go straight to the hands of the very rich CPP party leaders; people get displaced from their lands for things like Boeung Kak lake, railroad projects, road projects; and rich Cambodian political leaders get richer and poor Cambodian land owners get poorer, and it’s not the benefit in a long term.”

As in other elections, he said, the ruling Cambodian People’s Party will promise reform and concessions, he said, but “at the end of the day, the CPP retains all its control.”

Schanley Kuch, a political analyst in Maryland, said a “unilateral” government should be pressured from donors, including the US. “It creates suffering and the mistreatment of the Cambodian people,” he said.

Meanwhile, the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party and ruling party remain at odds over the election and the formation of the government. Some observers say that the longer it goes, the more things will stay the same.

“A prolonged standoff does not bode well for democratic reform,” said John Ciorciari, a public policy professor at the University of Michigan. “Neither party will benefit from a failure to reach a negotiated solution, as the CNRP will remain on the sidelines, and the CPP will rule with little legitimacy and an acute threat of unrest and foreign condemnation.”

Both sides, however, can benefit from working together, he said.

A compromise solution could entail public CPP commitments to concrete reforms and perhaps some key judicial and executive appointments for the CNRP, in exchange for the latter’s acceptance of an opposition role. This kind of deal would frustrate partisans on both sides, but it offers the most promising path forward for Cambodia.”

Calls for aid suspension is not the answer, he said.

“The CNRP is calling on foreign governments to suspend aid and cooperation with the CPP, but donors are not eager to burn bridges with a party that they expect to remain in power,” he said. “Cambodia’s main problems—if the CNRP stays out of the government—will be internal, as frustrated opposition protesters clash with the police, and the political space for compromise shrinks.”

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

look all of these beggar faces, look like their job is to bag for money only helping their own people no. look like they have nothing to do beside bagging for money.these are the future face of Khmer beggar.need to change

Anonymous said...

They was thieve,they are thieve and they will be thieve.

Anonymous said...

No donors want to offend Hun Sen government! In fact, they do not not care about Khmer government. However, they did not want to miss their Chinese FDI investment by the government of China who chose to be intimately close with Cambodia. Any country now is in dire need of FDI including the big powers that are themselves in economic trouble. Cambodia is in a good relationship with China but needs to be savvy in dealing with FDI. So far, we attracted rogue Chinese billionaires who are ferocious with our natural resources and our Rosewood trees because we did not know how to negotiate, and assess the future impacts of their investments according to the international codes for environment and natural resources. Therefore, the art of making any FDI mega-projects beneficial for the development of the country, the tangible rural economy, and Khmer future are the real keys that will determine the electoral winners in 2018.

I hope that CNRP will not miss the boat in sharpening their leadership skills and contributing to the reforms and country development.

Anonymous said...

After 30 years of AH HUN SEN rule, dirt-poor Cambodian garment workers are fighting for $3 more per day to pay for their lunch. This is what the so called Donors have done for Cambodia and that is to create dirt-poor permanent class of Cambodian people! These Donors are so blinded to see because it serves their interest well!




"Both sides, however, can benefit from working together, he said( John Ciorciari, a public policy professor at the University of Michigan."

=Base on past experience there is nothing special about being opposition in Cambodian government when the opposition doesn't have the power to make a change or to have check and balance? To have opposition in Cambodian government is only to make AH HUN SEN Vietcong slave government legal in the eye of international community. The role of the opposition in Cambodia so far has been a ceremonial role only to follow whatever AH HUN SEN Vietcong slave government want the opposition to do! What CNRP is doing now is to depart from the past experience and to have a real opposition within the Cambodian government to have a say , to take charge, and to decide the future of Cambodia! The opposition must have a place at the table!

Anonymous said...



United States and European Union believed the election was held in Cambodia on July 28, 2013 is not free and fair, over one million names had been removed from the voter lists and about 200,000 names duplication votes

United States and European Union requested Cambodia government to create the Independent election investigations to satisfy Cambodian people.

Anonymous said...

Insulted other doesn't make you any better.