Seen and heard on Ms. Theary C. Seng's Facebook accounts:
[I had read ORTHODOXY by G.K. Chesterton so
long ago that I had forgotten how extraordinarily witty he was! I can
see why the Catholics want to canonize him a saint.]
There is a notion adrift everywhere that imagination, especially mystical imagination, is dangerous to man’s mental balance. Poets are commonly spoken of as psychologically unreliable; and generally there is a vague association between wreathing laurels in your hair and sticking straws in it. Facts and history utterly contradict this view. Most of the very great poets have been not only sane, but extremely business-like; and if Shakespeare ever really held horses, it was because he was much the safest man to hold them. Imagination does not breed insanity. Exactly what does breed insanity is reason. Poets do not go mad; but chess players do. Mathematicians go mad, and cashiers; but creative artists very seldom. I am not, as will be seen, in any sense attacking logic: I only say that this danger does lie in logic, not in imagination.
The general fact is simple. Poetry is sane because it floats easily in an infinite sea; reason seeks to cross the infinite sea, and so make it finite. The result is mental exhaustion, like the physical exhaustion of Mr. Holbein. To accept everything is an exercise, to understand everything a strain. The poet only desires exaltation and expansion, a world to stretch himself in. The poet only asks to get his head into the heavens. It is the logician who seeks to get the heavens into his head. And it is his head that splits.
There is a notion adrift everywhere that imagination, especially mystical imagination, is dangerous to man’s mental balance. Poets are commonly spoken of as psychologically unreliable; and generally there is a vague association between wreathing laurels in your hair and sticking straws in it. Facts and history utterly contradict this view. Most of the very great poets have been not only sane, but extremely business-like; and if Shakespeare ever really held horses, it was because he was much the safest man to hold them. Imagination does not breed insanity. Exactly what does breed insanity is reason. Poets do not go mad; but chess players do. Mathematicians go mad, and cashiers; but creative artists very seldom. I am not, as will be seen, in any sense attacking logic: I only say that this danger does lie in logic, not in imagination.
Artistic paternity is as wholesome as physical paternity. Moreover, it
is worthy of remark that when a poet really was morbid it was commonly
because he had some weak spot of rationality on his brain. Poe, for
instance, really was morbid; not because he was poetical, but because he
was specially analytical. Even chess was too poetical for him; he
disliked chess because it was full of knights and castles, like a poem.
He avowedly preferred the black discs of draughts, because they were
more like the mere black dots on a diagram. Perhaps the strongest case
of all is this: that only one great English poet went mad, Cowper. And
he was definitely driven mad by logic, by the ugly and alien logic of
predestination. Poetry was not the disease, but the medicine; poetry
partly kept him in health. He could sometimes forget the red and thirsty
hell to which his hideous necessitarianism dragged him among the wide
waters and the white flat lilies of the Ouse. He was damned by John
Calvin; he was almost saved by John Gilpin. Everywhere we see that men
do not go mad by dreaming. Critics are much madder than poets. Homer is
complete and calm enough; it is his critics who tear him into
extravagant tatters. Shakespeare is quite himself; it is only some of
his critics who have discovered that he was somebody else. And though
St. John the Evangelist saw many strange monsters in his vision, he saw
no creature so wild as one of his own commentators.
The general fact is simple. Poetry is sane because it floats easily in an infinite sea; reason seeks to cross the infinite sea, and so make it finite. The result is mental exhaustion, like the physical exhaustion of Mr. Holbein. To accept everything is an exercise, to understand everything a strain. The poet only desires exaltation and expansion, a world to stretch himself in. The poet only asks to get his head into the heavens. It is the logician who seeks to get the heavens into his head. And it is his head that splits.
2 comments:
សាសនារលត់ ជាតិរលាយ!
សាសនារលត់ ជាតិរលាយ!
សាសនារលត់ ជាតិរលាយ!
សាសនារលត់ ជាតិរលាយ!
សាសនារលត់ ជាតិរលាយ!
សាសនារលត់ ជាតិរលាយ!
សាសនារលត់ ជាតិរលាយ!
សាសនារលត់ ជាតិរលាយ!
សាសនារលត់ ជាតិរលាយ!
ក
Post a Comment