Showing posts with label Michel Tranet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michel Tranet. Show all posts

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Observers See Role for Former King on Border Issue [-Good luck!?!?]

Former Cambodian King Norodom Sihanouk and Queen Norodom Monineath Sihanouk are greeted by students along a Phnom Penh road during during the marking of the country's 50th Independence Day in 2003. (Photo: AP)

Sok Khemara, VOA Khmer
Washington Wednesday, 30 March 2011
“Before he is gone, we should make a request to him asking his opinion.”
Former king Norodom Sihanouk could be a valuable asset in the Thai-Cambodian border dispute, a Cambodian historian says.

As monarch, Norodom Sihanouk led Cambodia’s bid to regain Preah Vihear temple from Thai occupation in 1962 through the International Court of Justice.

The court determined the temple belonged to Cambodia, but Thailand continues to dispute the ownership of land nearby, an issue that has led to a prolonged, deadly military standoff.

Michel Tranet, a history professor in Cambodia, told VOA Khmer in an interview that Norodom Sihanouk is a living witness to those events and could shed light on the court’s decision and the border standoff.

Wednesday, February 04, 2009

Artifact Theft 'Cultural Suicide': Official

Dr. Michel Tranet (Photo: RFA)
By Sok Khemara, VOA Khmer
Washington
03 February 2009



Not a single Cambodian temple has been immune to looting or war, a scientist said Monday, calling for the preservation of the temples as necessary for cultural identity.

How can one identify us as Khmer, if we don’t preserve the culture and temples our ancestors left for us?” said Michel Tranet, a doctoral archeologist, as a guest on “Hello VOA.”

At least 1,000 historic temples in Cambodia face “destruction” from looting and war, he said.

“This is not just a crime, but it’s cultural suicide,” he said. “I’m really suffering, seeing our artifacts on the market, but what can I do?”

Asked by one “Hello VOA” caller where temple artifacts are sold, Tranet emphasized that the digging, looting, destruction, trafficking, sale and purchase of artifacts is a crime.

“I’ve scavenged for artifacts before,” the caller, from Kampong Thom, said. “We dug three to four meters underneath temples. We usually found gold. But one day, I got a statue. When we took the statue home, a business man came…. He took it and he did not pay me. I was cheated. Where did he sell it?”

Tranet, who once served as undersecretary of state for the Ministry of Culture, also emphasized the importance of identifying Cambodian artifacts on the market.

“We do not have a full inventory yet, even though there are efforts from the Ministry of Culture and the government,” he said.

In January, Thailand agreed to return a group of statues that had been seized by Thai police as looters left Cambodia.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Stone inscription from Phnom Chiso temple: Be strong like an ant, powerful as a ghost and audacious as a woman

Phnom Chiso temple (Photo: Koh Santepheap)

Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Koh Santepheap
Translated from Khmer by Socheata

Phnom Chiso is located in Sla commune, Samrong district, Takeo province. The Phnom Chiso temple was built during three consecutive reigns before it was finally completed: its construction was started by King Suryavarman I between 1002 and 1045, followed by King Tharninvarman I between 1107 and 1113, and the last king who completed this temple was King Suryavarman II (the builder of Angkor Wat) between 1113 and 1145.

An inscription can be read in this temple stating: “Be strong like an ant, powerful as a ghost and audacious as a woman.” Based on legend told by villagers living near Phnom Chiso, once upon a time, King Suryadeva celebrated his son’s birthday. Numerous mandarins and Brahmans came to give their blessings to the prince. An old Brahman was presiding over the ceremony, and he was the last one to give his blessings to the prince. However, his blessing was quite different from all other people:
  • May you be strong like an ant
  • May you be powerful like a ghost
  • May you be audacious like a woman
When he heard these strange blessings, the king became very angry with the old Brahman, however the old man gave his explanation to the king by undertaking three experiments to convince the king.

According to Book No. 1 of the Khmer legends collected by Dr Michel Tranet, a Cambodian historian, about the history of Khmer temples, Dr. Tranet indicated that, for the first blessing, the Brahman ordered that a piece of steel the size of a human being be brought forward. The steel piece was about the same size and height of a human being, he then ordered a man to lift this piece of steel, but the man could not. He then ordered that a steel needle be cut to the size of an ant, and he dipped the piece of needle in honey and left it near an ant which carried it away.

For the second blessing about being as powerful as a ghost, he ordered that 7 dead bodies be buried next to each other in a desolated mount. One of the dead body was that of a woman who died while giving birth, another body from a person who died from snake bite, another one who died by a buffalo horn attack, another one died from lightning strike, another died from being hacked to death, another one who died from drowning, and another person who died from hanging himself. The 7 bodies were buried far away from any village, and 7 precious silver bowls were also buried next the head of each of the dead persons, next to each grave, offerings and white cloth will be left there as well. He then ordered daring people to go dig out the silver the bowl to keep for themselves during the middle of the night while candle sticks are burnt at each grave. During that time, no soldiers dared to go dig out the silver bowls, that was why the Brahman wished the prince to be as powerful as a ghost.

For the third blessing, the Brahman called in a poor man and told him in secret that if he was willing to kill his wife, he will given a high ranking position. The poor man refused to do so. Next, the Brahman called in the man’s wife and told her in secret that if she was willing to kill her husband, she would receive a lot of gold and silver as reward. After thinking about it overnight, the woman came back and replied that she was willing to do it. There it was! The wife was audacious enough to kill her husband. That was why the Brahman wished the young prince to be as audacious as a woman. Upon learning all these facts from the Brahman, the king nominated him as the top erudite in the kingdom and he wished the Brahman to have all his wishes fulfilled in life. He further made the Brahman the teacher for the prince from then on.

In the legend told by the villagers, there are some details that are added or removed to illustrate the words etched on the stone inscription so that they could be easily understood by anybody.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Under comrade Tep Vong, Buddhist monks need to hire bodyguards to protect themselves and their possessions

A monk feeds pigeons on Phnom Penh’s riverside as multiple bodyguards, in blue shirts, look on. (Heng Chivoan)

Come heavy, or don't come at all

Monday, 22 September 2008
Written by May Titthara
The Phnom Penh Post


For some Cambodian monks, the path to enlightenment is cleared by armed bodyguards who have become an increasingly common accessory for the clergy making their rounds

WHILE in the past the primary concern of monks was to find a quiet place for contemplation, today's new generation of young clergy seem less able to leave base material concerns behind and are instead hiring bodyguards to protect themselves and their possessions.

Tep Sao, a monk at Wat Botum, said that monks are now choosing to hire bodyguards because Cambodia is a socially and politically unstable country and monks need some heavies around if they are to go out into the community and engage in social work.

"As monks we can't act disorderly like ordinary people. When we don't have bodyguards, people sometimes don't respect us as monks and they sometimes try to attack us. When we have bodyguards we feel safe and we don't have to worry," Tep Sao said, adding that some high-ranking monks, such as the chief monk at his pagoda, were assigned bodyguards by the government.

But, Tep Sao was quick to point out that bodyguards who work for monks do not have an adverse effect on Buddhism because they are different from the bodyguards who work for high-ranking officials. "We do not allow our bodyguards to shoot guns even though they have them," he said.

Michel Tranet, former undersecretary of state at the Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts, said that he cannot condone monks having bodyguards because the monks' good deeds should mean that they do not have any enemies.

Against Buddhism?

"If they are monks and think only of dharma, how could they ever have any enemies?" Tranet asked. "Monks should avoid violence and never think of anybody as an enemy even if someone tries to do something bad to them. If monks have bodyguards, this breaks Buddhist rules.

"If a monk has a bodyguard it means that he is afraid and hasn't calmed down his emotions yet," he added.

Ki Sophorn, who works as a bodyguard for the chief monk at Wat Champoh Kaek, said that he has been ordered to protect the monastery's elder by the chief of the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces. "It is the order of the government that all chief monks must have a bodyguard," he said.

Most bodyguards who work to protect monks are provided by RCAF, the military police or ordinary police forces, and draw their salary from the government - not from the monks, said Ki Sophorn, adding that sometimes the chief monk helps him out by supplementing his wage.

"Working as a bodyguard for a monk is very easy," he said.

Meas Pov, a businessman at the Deumkor market, said that monks only use bodyguards because they are growing wealthier - frequently carrying phones and cash - and need to protect themselves from thieves.

"Monks should not have bodyguards because it makes it very difficult for people to meet them," he said.

"People have to ask the bodyguard for permission before they can approach the monk."

Both Chhorn Iem and Zakaryya Adam, secretaries of state at the Ministry of Culture and Religion, told the Post that they were unable to comment as they did not have any information about monks using bodyguards for protection.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Cambodia's Forgotten Temples Fall Prey to Looters

7/28/2008
Guardian Unlimited

Guards now patrol Angkor Wat but other cultural sites are being plundered daily.

The three freshly dug holes under the two arching palm trees measured a metre by about half a meter, and about half a meter deep. A few fragments of what appeared to be centuries-old clay pots were scattered around the excavation site, seemingly discarded as worthless in the hunt for more valuable treasure.

"We find new holes every week," said Ndson Hun, a farmer living in the nearby village of Phoum Snay. "The demand [for artefacts] is as great as ever, so people keep digging."

No one knows the extent of the riches at Phoum Snay, an unremarkable Cambodian village about 40 miles north-west of Angkor Wat, the complex of 100 9th to 15th-century Buddhist temples seen as among the world's architectural wonders. But, unlike at Angkor Wat, there are no heritage police here, no Unesco staff, and no local authorities to guard the site.

As the latest holes testify, anyone wishing to pillage the remaining hidden riches will encounter few obstacles. Experts fear the decades-long looting for artefacts across Cambodia is now so rampant there will soon be little left outside the splendours of the Unesco world heritage site at Angkor.

"Almost all sites of antiquity and temples far from towns are being destroyed," said Michel Trenet, the undersecretary of state at Cambodia's culture and fine arts ministry. "Naturally, the priority for us is to protect the Angkor sites and then think about the others. But we don't have enough guards and people are not motivated to protect their heritage. Cambodia is becoming a cultural desert."

Phoum Snay is a classic example. On its discovery, almost three years ago, the site was thought to have been a mass grave for victims of the Khmer Rouge, the communists who ruled from 1975-79 and under whose regime some 1.7 million people were executed or died from disease and starvation.

Then, when iron-age artifacts, including weapons, jewelery, pots and trinkets, started appearing, the site was reassessed as the burial ground of an ancient army. The researchers moved in, and digging started. Thousands of items were found.

Yet little was done to secure the area and antiques traders - people mainly from neighboring Thailand, say villagers, and seeking to sell Khmer treasures abroad - now have virtual free rein.

Their success is shown by the regularity with which Khmer artifacts appear at auction around the world. At any one time, dozens of Khmer "treasures" are on offer on the eBay auction website.

Poverty and greed are considered the two main motivations behind the looting. Monks living in a temple half a mile from Phoum Snay believe the villagers are involved in the illicit digging, despite protestations by Ndson Hun and his friends.

"The villagers are doing it because they are so poor," said Moy Sau, clad in his traditional saffron-coloured robes. "They don't respect their heritage because they can't afford to turn down an offer of a few dollars for a night's work."

Chea Vannath, president of the Centre for Social Development, says that the average annual income in Cambodia is about £155 a year - much lower in rural areas. "Protecting our cultural heritage is a luxury," she said. "People are fighting to survive so they don't know better."

Moy Sau does not dare warn the authorities about the looting: "As a monk I cannot do anything because I rely on the villagers for my food."

Preservation

Even if he raised the alarm, that might not ensure the artifacts' preservation since government officials and members of the security forces are also involved in the trade, widespread reports suggest.

A stone carver based a few miles away, in Phum Rohal, who was too afraid to give his name, said some provincial government officials last month asked him to build a base for a "half Buddha" that one of their bosses had acquired.

"I was suspicious even though they had lots of letters and said it would be kept in a temple," he said. "But I did it because I'm afraid of the authorities. Us little people can do nothing against them."

With the country's legal system being so corrupt, the "dark forces", Mr Trenet says, are too powerful, even for him.

A tour of Toul Ta Puon, known as the Russian market, in the capital, Phnom Penh, proves his point, with shops packed with tall cabinets full of artifacts. Bronze-age axe heads and rings sell for less than £15. One intricately carved 11th-century, long-necked water jar was £30.

The shopkeepers appear motivated only by money and refuse to lower their prices, even for Mr Trenet, though most recognise him. "I would like to buy all [the artifacts] for the museum. But my salary is only [£155] a month so what can I do?" he says.

Wednesday, June 04, 2008

Heritage Temple Will Bring Benefits: Officials

Cambodian flag flying over Preah Vihear Temple (Photo: BBC)

By Poch Reasey, VOA Khmer
Washington
03 June 2008

"Cambodia should submit the temple as well as the surrounding area for protection" - Sean Pengse, President of the Cambodia Border Committee

Cambodia will gain many benefits once Preah Vihear temple receives Unesco's World Heritage Site status, a government spokesman said Monday.

The temple will receive recognition and financial assistance, once approved, said Phay Siphan, Council of Ministers spokesman, as a guest on "Hello VOA."

"Cambodia will also be able to develop its tourism, which will lead to poverty reduction," he said.

Michael Tranet, the former vice president of Unesco's Cambodia committee, said the recognition of Preah Vihear temple as Cambodian represented a second victory for the country, the first coming from then king Norodom Sihanouk's winning the temple in world court hearing.

Unesco will make a formal announcement of the temple's World Heritage status in July, Phay Siphan said.

Sean Pengse, president of the Cambodia Border Committee, based in Paris, told VOA Khmer recently that Cambodia should submit the temple as well as the surrounding area for protection.

Saturday, January 26, 2008

Cambodian historian Michel Tranet couldn’t believe Thailand opposes the listing Preah Viear as World Heritage Site

Cambodian Historian Michel Tranet (Photo: RFA)

Saturday, January 26, 2007
Rasmei Kampuchea newspaper
Translated from Khmer by Socheata

Cambodian Historian Michel Tranet said that he cannot believe yet the report about whether Thailand opposes or not the listing of Preah Vihear Temple on the UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Michel Tranet said: “What do they (Thailand) actually mean? If this is true (that Thailand opposes Preah Vihear’s listing), then it is a shame for Thailand.” He said: “Preah Vihear Temple is on the Cambodian territory, and it was recognized by the world. Cambodia has the right to list it as a World Heritage Site.”

Michel Tranet does not believe that Thailand could think in this manner. He compares Thailand’s opposition of the listing of Preah Vihear in the World Heritage Site to an unfeasible feat, just like the demand to return the Khmer province of Surin (in Thailand), and the demand to return Kampuchea Krom (South Vietnam) back to Cambodia are unfeasible.

He also talked about the necessity of Cambodia and Thailand to live in brotherhood and they must cooperate with each other. He said that we can cooperate with each other if Thailand wants to develop Preah Vihear, but under Cambodia’s supervision, in that case “we welcome it.” Cambodia’s goal is to list Preah Vihear as a World Heritage Site, and this action was welcomed and supported by the world, and in particular by a number of major countries in the world.

In mid-January, 8 counties and 8 National and International organizations met to discuss the results of research on the conservation development and the renovation of Preah Vihear Temple. This is a precursor to the upcoming proclamation of the inclusion of Preah Vihear in the UNESCO World Heritage Site list, during the 32nd UNESCO plenary session meeting in 2008.

Nevertheless, the latest news published by Thailand’s The Nation newspaper on 25 January, indicated that after the publication of the spokesman of Thailand’s Defense Ministry, this spokesman and the spokesman of Thailand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs came out to confirm that the previous declaration (made on 24 January) was a mistake and an error that could lead to the deterioration of the good relationships between the two countries.

The two Thai spokesmen said that army officials from Cambodia and Thailand spoke to each others over the phone and came to an understanding on this issue already.

Tharit Charungvat, spokesman for Thailand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, indicated that the listing of Preah Vihear as a World Heritage Site will take place normally, and that Thailand will not lose any territory from this listing. He claimed that the incident which took place does not affect the relationships between Cambodia and Thailand.

Monday, February 19, 2007

Professor Keng Vannsak expresses his regret

Prof Keng Vannsak (Photo: RFA)

Dr Long Siem (Photo: RFA)

Dr Michel Tranet (Photo: RFA)

18 Feb 2007
By Mayarith
Radio Free Asia

Translated from Khmer by Heng Soy

One historian, one literature specialist, along with Prof. Keng Vannsak have visited the diverging opinions regarding Jayavarman VII, the historical Khmer king.

The debate which took place on Saturday on RFA’s program “Listerners forum,” was organized after criticisms were leveled against Prof Keng Vannsak who raised the issue that King Jayavarman VII – whom most Cambodians consider as a strong and exemplary king for Cambodians of all generations – was of Cham origin, and that he forced people to perform hard labor, as well as giving away the Cambodian land of Sukothai to the former Siam.

The debate brought together the famous Dr Michel Tranet, and Dr Long Siem.

Prof Keng Vannsak expresses his regret when he learnt that the result of his research based on the documents he owns, causes a lot of angry reaction from people.

In clarifying his point on the people’s angry reaction, Prof Keng Vannsak said by telephone from France: “… I really regret it because I do not want to stir this. All the issues I have heard regarding the sculptures of Javarman VII, be they intact or mutilated, they all originated from my research…”

In an earlier interview with RFA, Prof Keng Vannsak claimed that he has an original copy of a document which he kept, that provides the story of King Jayavarman VII.

During the debate, Dr Michel Tranet, a social science expert, and Dr Long Siem, an expert in Cambodian stone inscriptions, said that their research did not turn up any of the claims made by Prof Keng Vannsak.

Michel Tranet said: “If we base ourselves on our history noted on the stone inscriptions we have, there are reports detailing the exceptional character of the king [Jayavarnan VII] who not only have all the Buddhist compassion towards the people of that time, but the king is also the builder of our Cambodia following the war, and bring back Cambodia’s glory.”

Long Siem added: “During his era, or shortly after his reign, people pay respect to him as an equal to Buddha. That is why we find a technical word: “Chey-puth” [Chey=Jaya=Victory, Puth=Buddha], that’s the first point. Secondly, the sculptures in Bayon are a permanent … exposition of extraordinary pictures representing the actual daily life of people…”

The debate which lasted 45 minutes, revisited the case of King Jayavarman VII, but it did not examine which view is right and which one is wrong because of technical phone line difficulties linking Cambodia, and the limited air time available.