Showing posts with label Not accepting responsability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Not accepting responsability. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 08, 2010

Dangerous hide-and-seek game by Cambodia's royal palace

Left to rigth: Thomico, Former monarch Sihanouk and Yim Sovann

SRP refuses to pursue exchanges with the royal palace

07 June 2010
By Meas Mony
Free Press Magazine Online
Translated from Khmer by Heng Soy
Click here to read the article in Khmer

KI-Media notes:
  • Thomico: “…the former monarch [Norodom Sihanouk] does not have the right to get involved in state affairs”
  • Yet, Thomico forgets that: “the former monarch is OFFICIALLY invited to visit Srok Yuon as a stateman of Cambodia.”
  • Well, Thomico, which of the two issues above is correct? Is former king Sihanouk involved in state affairs or not? If he is not, then he shouldn’t visit Srok Yuon, lest he wants to violate Cambodia’s Constitution.
The request made by a group of SRP MPs asking former monarch Norodom Sihanouk to help intervene with the Yuon government on border issue when the latter will perform his 4-day official visit on Yuon land at the end of June, under invitation from Yuon president Nguyen Minh Triet, has turned into a heated verbal exchange. However, recently, the SRP refused to pursue this verbal exchange with the royal palace.

On Monday, Yim Sovann, SRP MP and spokesman, told FPM: “I don’t want to pursue exchanges with the royal palace as it can viewed as if I am opposed to the king. However, all Cambodian citizens have the right and the duty to defend our territorial integrity.”

Yim Sovann made this statement after Sisowath Thomico, the personal secretary of king Norodom Sihanouk, claimed that the request letter by SRP MPs for the king’s intervention: “seems to be like a trap for the throne.”

According to Thomico, the SRP’s letters looks like a challenge for the former monarch who does not have the right to get involved in state affairs. Thomico accused: “Why the SRP does not declare itself as republican directly?

It should be noted that, currently, the problems of encroachment on Khmer territories – both along the western border with Siam and along the eastern border with Yuon – are reaching a boiling point. In particular, along the eastern border, up to now, two villagers who dare talked about Yuon planting encroaching border posts have already been sent to jail by the Phnom Penh regime. In Takeo province, villagers who appealed for intervention to the loss of their rice fields from border post encroachment are now living in fear for their own safety.

The planting of border posts along the eastern border is conducted in great mystery and without transparency, no Members of Parliament or Cambodian citizens, the rightful owners of the country, can overlook this operation. These irregularities create doubts among civil society, as well as the opposition party, as it can be perceived as if the government is undertaking bad deeds to deliver Khmer lands to the Yuons.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Khmer Rouge leaders do not accept responsibility

Monday, February 11, 2008
Everyday.com.kh
Translated from Khmer by Heng Soy

SRP MP Son Chhay scolded the former Khemr rouge leaders, calling them a group of people who do not accept their responsibility for the actions they took in the past. Son Chhay told RFA last Saturday that these leaders are dictators and cowards. Even up to now, this group of people does not have the courage to confess their mistakes, even though they destroyed the lives of millions of people, and they imposed hardship, separations, lost of loved ones, and made victims from the savage actions they took. Son Chhay added that the dictators never confess their mistakes, and when they lose power, they all tell people to forget about the past. Son Chhay’s reaction came after Nuon Chea, known as Brother No. 2 of the Democratic Kampuchea regime, said to the KR Tribunal last week that he asked to obtain his bail (to maintain the) national reconciliation under the leadership of Prime minister Hun Sen. This is the first time that such statement was heard.