Bangkok Post
The Central Administrative Court on Wednesday ordered the revocation of a resolution passed by the Samak Sundaravej cabinet approving the Thai-Cambodian joint communique supporting Phnom Penh's bid to list Preah Vihear temple as a World Heritage site with the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.
The joint communique was issued on May 22, 2008 and the cabinet under the late PM Samak passed the resolution approving it on June 17 of the same year.
The case was filed on June 24 last year by 13 people including senators, academics and human rights activists.
In their complaint, they asked the court to revoke the June 17 cabinet resolution supporting the joint communique because it was not given parliamentary approval as required under Section 190 of the constitution.
The joint declaration was signed by Mr Noppadon and Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Sok An on June 18 last year, a day after the Samak administration gave it the green light.
On June 28 last year, the Administrative Court issued an injunction ordering the suspension of the joint communique. The Supreme Administrative Court later upheld the ruling.
The Central Administrative Court ruled that the communique was a form of agreement that involved Thailand's boundary. The communique, therefore, required prior approval from parliament, it said.
The court ordered the revocation of the communique as requested by the petitioners.
Mr Nitithorn Lamlua, a lawyer of the People's Alliance for Democracy, said he would send the court verdict in this case to the National Anti-Corruption Commission and ask the anti-graft agency to take legal action against Mr Noppadon for malfeasance.
Mr Noppadon earlier argued that the joint communique did not require parliament's approval because it was not an international treaty. He said the document would not lead to the loss of Thai territory to Cambodia as it made clear to Phnom Penh there would be no change regarding the disputed area near Preah Vihear.
The joint communique was issued on May 22, 2008 and the cabinet under the late PM Samak passed the resolution approving it on June 17 of the same year.
The case was filed on June 24 last year by 13 people including senators, academics and human rights activists.
In their complaint, they asked the court to revoke the June 17 cabinet resolution supporting the joint communique because it was not given parliamentary approval as required under Section 190 of the constitution.
The joint declaration was signed by Mr Noppadon and Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Sok An on June 18 last year, a day after the Samak administration gave it the green light.
On June 28 last year, the Administrative Court issued an injunction ordering the suspension of the joint communique. The Supreme Administrative Court later upheld the ruling.
The Central Administrative Court ruled that the communique was a form of agreement that involved Thailand's boundary. The communique, therefore, required prior approval from parliament, it said.
The court ordered the revocation of the communique as requested by the petitioners.
Mr Nitithorn Lamlua, a lawyer of the People's Alliance for Democracy, said he would send the court verdict in this case to the National Anti-Corruption Commission and ask the anti-graft agency to take legal action against Mr Noppadon for malfeasance.
Mr Noppadon earlier argued that the joint communique did not require parliament's approval because it was not an international treaty. He said the document would not lead to the loss of Thai territory to Cambodia as it made clear to Phnom Penh there would be no change regarding the disputed area near Preah Vihear.