Showing posts with label Thai military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thai military. Show all posts

Saturday, July 02, 2011

[Thai] Armed forces put on standby

2/07/2011
Wassana Nanuam & Apinya Wipatayotin
Bangkok Post

Defence Minister Prawit Wongsuwon has ordered all three of the country's armed forces to get ready for the implementation of the national defence plan, a military source says.

The armed forces are ready to protect Thai territory along the border with Cambodia, the source said yesterday.

The army is ready to implement its Kasat Suk (Warlord) and Phichit Suk (War Victory) plans. The Suranaree Task Force serves as the focal point of these two plans.

The navy's border defence forces in Chanthaburi and Trat have been deployed to the Thai-Cambodian border in the two provinces. Navy warships have been put on standby as well.

Thursday, April 07, 2011

Thai Military Not Participating In Thai-Cambodia Peace Talks

Brian Padden, Voice of America
Jakarta April 07, 2011

Members of the Thai-Cambodian Joint Boundary Commission are meeting Thursday in Indonesia to again address a dispute over land surrounding a Hindu temple built 900 years ago.

Indonesia, in its role as head of the Association of South East Asia Nations, negotiated a cease-fire after clashes in February that killed killed 10 people and displaced thousands. But now the Thai military is rejecting a key element of the agreement calling for Indonesian observers to be placed along the border.

Missing in the peace talks between Thailand and Cambodia, in Indonesia, is the Thai military. Pavin Chachavalpongpun, with the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore, says that is because of a disagreement between the foreign ministry and military leaders in Thailand about how to deal with the border dispute.

"I think there is a clash between the two state agencies about the control over foreign policy,” Chachavalpongpun said. “And I think the military has disapproved of the foreign ministry policy towards Cambodia, which I think the military claim that it is a little bit too soft."

Friday, July 23, 2010

Thailand Military Change of Guard – A New Era of Cooperation or Increasing Hostility

"Facing with these looming volatilities, it would be prudent for the Royal Government of Cambodia to remain cautious and adopt the “don’t provoke, don’t fear” policy vis-à-vis Thailand."
Friday, July 23, 2010
Op-Ed by Davan Long

For military observers and analysts, it is no surprised that this year Thailand democrat-led coalition government is in an unusual hurry to complete its annual military reshuffling, and that the Royal Government of Cambodia is closely watching this event due to its real potential to further severe the already-tense bilateral relationship between the two countries.

Usually each year in August/September, the commanders of Thai armed forces submit their reshuffle lists, which recommend the promotions and appointments of senior officers to key positions, to the Defence Minister through the defence permanent secretary. The Prime Minister and his cabinet will then review and finalize the list before sending it to the Privy Council for royal endorsement.

In a hasty move, Defence Minister General Prawit Wongsuwon has instructed that this year’s military reshuffle lists be submitted to the defence permanent secretary, General Apichart Penkitti, no later than July 20. With this new deadline, Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva would be able to forward the final list for royal blessing by the end of August, a month ahead of the usual schedule.

One plausible hypothesis for such a rush is that the Constitution Court, as requested by the Election Commission, may dissolve PM Abhisit Vejjajiva’s political party for allegedly violating Political Party Act in 2005 by receiving a 258 million bath donation through a third party, as well as for allegedly misusing 29 million baths of political development fund. PM Abhisit Vejjajiva is also facing possible impeachment proceedings over a string of other allegations under investigation by the National Anti-Corruption Agency.

Another possible hypothesis is that knowing that his government may not survive the pending allegations, PM Abhisit Vejjajiva may attempt to boost his much-needed credibility by unilaterally calling an early election. Whatever the scenario is, the ultimate goal of his government is to ensure that it can complete the military reshuffle before the next general election. In fact, that was arguably the main reason why he refused to call general election immediately as demanded during the red-shirt protests, instead offering to hold it in November 2010.

The outcome of this year military reshuffle will shape Thai political landscape for years to come, and Prime Minster Abhisit Vejjajiva is clearly determined to get anti-Thaksin, ultra-royalist army generals into dominating military positions. In case his party does not emerge as the winner in the next elections, those army generals can decisively exert influences over the formation of the coalition governments. That was precisely what Generals Prawit, Anupong and Prayuth did to “persuade” other parties to leave the pro-Thaksin Puea Thai party to form the coalition government with the Democratic Party. Indeed, one could further argue that without the continued backing from the military, PM Abhisit Vejjajiva’s coalition government would have succumbed to the red-shirt protests.

The most anticipated outcome in this year military reshuffling is the compulsory retirement of General Anupong Poachinda who has been the army Commander-in-Chief since 2007, and the appointment of his deputy, General Prayuth Chan-ocha, a known favorite of the Royal Palace, as a successor. If his promotion is confirmed, General Prayuth Chan-ocha could essentially remain in the army’s top job till 2014, at which time he will reach the mandatory retirement age of 60.

Graduates from Pre-Cadet Class 12, General Prayuth Chan-ocha is a long time close friend and protégé of General Anupong Poachinda. He previously held the positions of Commander of the First Army Region, and Army Chief-of-Staff before getting promoted to his current position. Like General Anupong, General Prayuth has also commanded the high profile Queen’s Guard Second Division.

Together with General Anupong, General Prayuth played key role in the 2006 putsch that ousted Thaksin in 2006, and later at the peak of army internal rift, the alliance between Prawit (pre-Cadet Class 6), Anupong (Pre-Cadet Class 10) and Prayuth, known as “Eastern Tigers” pack, was seen as a stabilizing force for the irreconcilable differences between military factions.

Ironically, the Anupong-Prayuth fraternity appeared to take a different turn during the red-shirt protests as the latter inserted his hawkish influences at the Center of Resolution for Emergency Situation (CRES). There was unconfirmed rumor that General Prayuth was contemplating “half coup” to remove General Anupong while keeping Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva coalition government intact. General Prayuth categorically denied the allegation. However, in a country like Thailand, which had gone through eighteen military coups since becoming a Constitutional Monarchy in 1932, any rumor of military coup, no matter how improbable it was, could not be entirely dismissed. On that note, it is arguable that if General Prayuth does become the Army Commander-in-Chief, it is likely because of his close tie with the 90 years-old retired General Prem Tinsulanonda, presently President of the Privy Council, as well as his good working relationship with Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva.

During the red-shirt protests in April and May this year, General Prayuth was seen as not only adamantly anti-Thaksin but also a hardliner who advocated tough military actions against the red-shirts, in stark contrast to General Anupong who publicly favored political over military solution and refused to take harsh military actions against the protesters.

If General Prayuth does get promoted to the army top job, the democrat-led coalition government, which seems to neither trust nor have control over the police, will enjoy the much-needed unreserved backing from the military to crack down hard on the pro-Thaksin movement. However, tough military actions can backfire the government as it will likely drive the pro-Thaksin movement into deeper and possibly better organized underground movement.

It is too soon to state that having General Prayuth at the helm of the army will provide greater stability for Thailand ongoing socio-political unrest. The rapid and meteoric rise of General Prayuth and his clique (Pre-Cadet Class 12) has been widely perceived as at the expense of more professional soldiers belonging to different cliques or serving in less royally decorated units. Top generals and commanders who feel their careers were sidelined or wrecked by Pre-Cadet Class 12 are prone to become watermelon soldiers (green outside, red inside), a popular expression for referring to the soldiers who sympathize with the red-shirt protesters. A number of these disfranchised generals, some of whom have undying loyalty to Thaksin, may secretly support the red-shirts leaders currently in hiding or actively working underground. In fact some government officials strongly suspect that the black-clad militants who fought along side the red-shirt protesters were soldiers from rival units.

The appointment of General Prayuth as army chief is likely to further complicate the already strained relationship between Cambodia and Thailand. It would not be a surprise if some speculations have already been circulated in the current Thai coalition government and military leadership that the red-shirts could use Cambodia soil as a training camp to mount anti-government activities. Such speculations could easily lead to serious, though false, accusations. There is also a concern that the new army chief may force the Preah Vihear issue with Cambodia to defuse the domestic political unrest and internal rivalry between army factions.

Facing with these looming volatilities, it would be prudent for the Royal Government of Cambodia to remain cautious and adopt the “don’t provoke, don’t fear” policy vis-à-vis Thailand.

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Thai Prime Minister Stands His Ground

Anti-government protesters blocked a main road leading into Bangkok about north of the city on Sunday. (Sukree Sukplang/Reuters)

April 25, 2010
By SETH MYDANS and THOMAS FULLER
The New York Times


BANGKOK — Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva said on television Sunday that he continued to seek a peaceful solution to the country’s tense political standoff but that he would not give in to what he called intimidation by anti-government demonstrators.

With his military commander, Gen. Anupong Paochinda, sitting beside him, he rejected a call by the “red shirt” protesters for a dissolution of Parliament within 30 days, saying, “The ultimatum is just aimed at getting the attention of the foreign media.”

The red-shirt protesters, many of them from poor rural areas outside the city, have occupied parts of Bangkok for more than six weeks.

They are calling on the government to step down and hold a new election.

“Negotiations must be done to find a solution for most of the country, not just the red shirts, who are just part of society,” Mr. Abhisit said.

In recent days, counterdemonstrations have grown among people calling themselves the no-colors or the multi-colors, supporting Mr. Abhisit and opposing a dissolution of the government.

On Sunday afternoon, more than 5,000 of these protesters gathered across town from the red shirts, holding up signs that proclaimed their allegiance to the government and to the monarchy. As they gain momentum, these protesters have begun emulating the red shirts, selling flags, T-shirts, caps and headbands.

The emergence of counterdemonstrators has raised concerns about a clash in the streets that could lead to uncontrolled violence. On Thursday, five grenades exploded as the two groups were taunting each other across a makeshift barricade, killing one person and wounding scores of others.

The class divide between the two groups was illustrated Sunday afternoon as a Mercedes sedan drove past Victory Monument, its passengers cheering and waving Thai flags.

On Friday the red shirts eased their demand for an immediate government dissolution, saying that they would give Mr. Abhisit 30 days to make preparations.

“I never reject a political solution, but a political solution must not create a precedent that intimidation will bring about social change,” Mr. Abhisit said.

“Thirty days is out of the question,” he added. “I don’t think this problem can be solved within 30 days.” In response, the red shirts said on Sunday that they would hold their ground, deepening an impasse that has seen few public overtures toward a peaceful solution.

On Sunday in a new tactic, protesters gathered in the heart of the city’s commercial district began replacing their red shirts with ordinary civilian clothes, saying that they wanted to protect themselves from attack.

“They will do everything to block us from coming here,” said Rassamee Pimpila, 56, a school principal from the northeast.

He added: “It’s like a war. We have to eat and sleep on the street,” although one nearby department store, Central World, which has been forced by the protests to close its doors, has allowed the red shirts to use its lavatories.

General Anupong has said little throughout the recent weeks of tension and has appeared reluctant to take strong action against the demonstrators, apparently fearing widespread chaos and bloodshed.

The army’s first attempt to disperse the protesters, on April 10, was met by fierce resistance and cost 25 lives and caused hundreds of other casualties.

“We won’t use violence,” General Anupong said, “but as I’ve said earlier, the situation has escalated toward violence, so the military will have to adjust its measures.” He did not elaborate.

“As the prime minister said, if there is anything needed to bring back peace, we’ll do it.”

Mr. Abhisit has said that the red shirts have been infiltrated by terrorists seeking to destabilize the tense standoff, but the red shirts have disavowed any connection with these armed men, who are believed to be rogue elements of the military.

On Sunday the red shirts displayed a large banner in English that read: “Peaceful protesters not terrorists.”

Responding to reports of splits within the military that could hamper any strong steps he might order, the general said, “Being a huge organization, it’s possible, but the number isn’t significant enough to say that the military is divided. More importantly, everyone strictly follows orders.”

The unity of the armed forces and particularly of the police has been called into question by evidence of half-hearted resistance to provocations by the red shirts and even of possible collaboration by some elements.

Particularly in the northeast, the police and local officials have openly expressed their support of the red-shirt movement.

On Sunday, local television reported that red shirts near the northeastern city of Udon Thani had stopped a convoy of 178 police officers heading to reinforce deployments in Bangkok.

“We are the nation’s, people’s and His Majesty’s army,” General Anupong said. “Individually there might be some problems, but it’s not significant. The whole army institution remains solid, just like I said.”

Monday, April 19, 2010

Thai troops on Bangkok streets to protect financial hub

04/19/2010
Agence France-Presse

BANGKOK, Thailand—Hundreds of Thai troops, many of them armed, were deployed on the streets of Bangkok early Monday to protect the city's financial heart from anti-government rallies, witnesses said.

AFP reporters saw military and riot police station themselves in the central financial district, known as Silom, close to the Reds' current rally base in the capital's commercial heartland.

"There are several units currently armed to prevent themselves from attacks from terrorists who are hiding among protesters," said government spokesman Panitan Wattanayagorn.

A soldier, asking not to be named, said the troops were there to block the Reds if they came up Silom Road. "We will not attack them, we are blocking them," he told AFP.

The security personnel had stacked uncoiled barbed wire at the roadside. Many were seen armed with assault rifles and shotguns while some had only riot shields.

The Reds began their demonstration demanding immediate elections more than a month ago, and it remained largely peaceful until a failed army crackdown nine days ago led to clashes that left 25 people dead and more than 800 injured.

The government has asked the police's special investigation unit to probe the bloodshed, blaming "terrorists" for inciting violence.

Embattled Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva handed broader powers to his army chief Anupong Paojinda Friday after a bungled operation to arrest senior protesters.

Thailand ready to go to war with Cambodia?

Top army, navy units readied for dispersal

April 19, 2010
The Nation

Elite forces from all three branches of the armed forces and police are being mobilised to carry out operations to remove red-shirt demonstrators from the Rajprasong intersection in Bangkok.

The rules of engagement are modelled on an emergency plan after 2003 when the Thai embassy and businesses run by Thai firms in Phnom Penh were burnt down by a rowdy mob.

Thailand was reportedly ready to go to war with Cambodia, with combat units readied and F-16 fighters put on standby for possible aerial attacks.

On Saturday evening, Army commander General Anupong Paochinda called a meeting of military commandants, the chief of staff and the acting police commander to discuss operational readiness of all units involved.

The meeting agreed that the military would no longer tolerate armed terrorists blending in with red-shirt mobs in Bangkok.

Army units to be used are capable of "special operations". They include Task Force 90 - a heli-borne infantry assault unit, the 31 Infantry Regiment and red-bereted Army special operations forces. The Navy would dispatch their US-trained SEAL commandos and the Marines Force Recon strike force.

The Air Force will rely on their special operations commandos while the police would dispatch 191 SWAT commandos, anti-terrorism Arintharaj Force and paratroopers.

A joint intelligence report concluded that the armed men were recruited from three groups of people: separatists in the South, mercenaries from neighbouring countries, and paramilitary men trained by active officers allied with the red shirts.

Whatever sources they are from, the prime objective of the coming operations is to deal with the "armed third force", coupled with red-shirt masses travelling to Bangkok from Monday to Wednesday.

All tall buildings nearby Rajprasong intersection are now manned by security officials.

What remains to be seen is whether these units will accomplish their mission - neutralising the armed terrorists, in line with a recently concluded hard-line determination by the Centre for the Resolution of Emergency Situation.

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Thai army says will "punish" protesters

  • Army warns protesters against occupying banking district
  • PM Abhisit skips national address for a second week
By Ploy Ten Kate and Martin Petty

BANGKOK, April 18 (Reuters) - Thailand's military vowed on Sunday to "punish" anti-government protesters if they march on Bangkok's central business district, heightening fears of more violence after bloody clashes left 24 people dead a week ago.

Red-shirted supporters of ousted premier Thaksin Shinawatra said on Saturday they would take thier protest to the financial district, two blocks away from their main downtown protest base, on Tuesday, in defiance of an emergency decree.

"We won't let them go anywhere further," army spokesman Sansern Kaewkamnerd said.

Sansern stopped short of using the word "crackdown" but said protesters occupying the plush shopping and hotel district for a 16th day would be dealt with.

"Let's say that we are left with no choice but to enforce the law," Sansern told TNN television. "Those who do wrong will get their punishment. Taking back the area along with other measures are all included in enforcing the law. All this must be done."

An uneasy calm has prevailed in the capital over a Thai new year holiday period in the wake of Thailand's worst violence in almost two decades, which triggered a huge selloff in the stock market .SETI after six weeks of gains.

A heated confrontation between troops and demonstrators, who are demanding that Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva dissolve parliament and step down, led to bloody clashes on April 10, the first outbreak of violence in the six-week protests.

Adding to concerns about more unrest, leaders of the anti-Thaksin "yellow shirt" movement -- representing royalists, the business elite, aristocrats and urban middle class -- met on Sunday to discuss their position on the crisis.

The yellow shirts staged a crippling eight-day blockade of Bangkok's airports in December 2008, which stranded more than 230,000 tourists, disrupted trade flows and led to credit ratings downgrades for Southeast Asia's second-largest economy.

The siege ended when a pro-Thaksin ruling party was dissolved for electoral fraud, paving the way for Abhisit's rise to power after a parliamentary vote the red shirts say was influenced heavily by the military in a "silent coup".

Abhisit rebuffs claims his government is illegitimate and has refused to step down. He failed to deliver his regular televised address on Sunday for a second week and has been uncharacteristically reclusive since last week's clashes.

ELITE TARGETED

Several thousand protesters rallied on Sunday at the Rachaprasong intersection, dubbed their "final battleground", listening to speeches and huddling in the shade as the burning sun took its toll. More were arriving for a rally that typically draws tens of thousands by evening.

The planned protest on Tuesday would target Bangkok Bank BBL.BK, Thailand's biggest lender, which red shirts have linked to the elite they say conspired to bring down elected governments backed or led by Thaksin, who was ousted in a 2006 coup and fled into exile ahead of a graft conviction.

Protesters have taken aim at Prem Tinsulanonda, a former army chief, premier and honorary adviser to the bank, who serves as the top aide to Thailand's revered King Bhumibol Adulyadej.

Faced with criticism over the military's handling of the protests, Abhisit appeared on television on Friday to announce that responsibility for security had been handed to army chief Anupong Paochinda, who retires in September and has been reluctant to tackle the protests.

"I think him passing responsibility to the commander-in-chief is his way of pushing him to actually do something, since he will be responsible for what happens now," said Joshua Kurlantzick of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a U.S. think tank.

"I'm not sure it's Abhisit trying to evade responsibility. He's still going to have to face the consequences at the polls at some point."

The seemingly intractable five-year crisis has fuelled speculation that with the government and security forces in disarray, and concerns about clashes between rival demonstrators, hardliners within the military may decide to stage a coup to end the impasse, which analysts say would likely backfire.

(Additional reporting by Eric Gaillard and Nopporn Wong-Anan; Editing by Nick Macfie)

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Thai army rifts spill into open

Apr 14, 2010
Reuters
  • Analysts see split in army: some soldiers back protesters
  • But most top brass allied with royalists, business elite
  • Source says 'red shirt' protesters operate on two fronts
Fissure in the military
* A high-level source close to Prime Minister Abhisit described the 'red shirt' movement as operating with two distinct fronts - the peaceful, non-violent protesters who staged a series of rolling street rallies in Bangkok since March 14 and a separate wing led by former and current generals in the army.

* The fissure in an institution central to Thailand's power structure is deepening uncertainty over the outlook for South-east Asia's second-largest economy, in part because neither side prevailed on Saturday, leaving two groups with military muscle at odds with each other.

* Government and military sources said former army chief Chavalit Yongchaiyudh, a former prime minister and close ally of Mr Thaksin, led other current and former generals in providing support to the 'red shirts'.

Mr Chavalit has denied involement in Saturday's protests, which marked a violent escalation from the pattern of rallies seen during Thailand's polarising political crisis.

* TV footage showed some protesters armed with assault rifles or machine guns. M79 grenades were fired at soldiers. Grainy photographs showed at least one sniper positioned in a building.

The coalition government, which came to power in a 2008 parliamentary vote with tacit backing from the military's top leaders, says its troops only fired in the air. It has not been able to explain how at least nine protesters died from high-velocity gunshot wounds.

* Publicly, the government blames a 'third hand' for stirring up the violence. Privately, it says arms and extra forces were supplied by pro-Thaksin renegades who they believe also targeted and killed a key military figure on Saturday, a colonel who suppressed a red shirt protest last year.

* There is no doubt that Mr Chavalit is a protagonist in the political drama now unfolding: immediately after Saturday's mayhem he called on Mr Abhisit to dissolve parliament.

In October, Mr Chavalit became chairman of the red shirts' parliamentary wing, the Puea Thai Party. He then persuaded scores of retired soldiers to join with him in what was seen as a move to create divisions in a normally rock-solid institution.

He made headlines last year by traveling to Cambodia for discussions with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, who days later infuriated Thailand's leaders by offering Mr Thaksin a job as economic adviser and a base in Cambodia.

* The worsening split, government sources say, is transforming life at a military base where Mr Abhisit and other senior cabinet officials now regularly meet, and sometimes sleep. Officials say their plans are being leaked from the base, the 11th Infantry Battalion of the Royal Guard.

* It is unclear how far the military and its backers will go to save the government and how far they will resist the re-emergence of Mr Thaksin's allies, who would stand a good chance of returning to power in an election.

Much depends on an internal jostle for power in a country where the military is closely aligned with the monarchy and at a time when 82-year-old King Bhumibol Adulyadej has been in hospital since September, adding another element of uncertainty. -- REUTERS
BANGKOK - WHO were the shadowy gunmen firing on troops in Bangkok's bloody riots last weekend, and who fired the grenades?

The answers to those questions could point to the emergence of a dangerous split within Thailand's armed forces, one that could spark more bloodshed unless the beleaguered government calls elections promptly to defuse the political tensions.

Saturday's clashes, which killed 21 people and wounded hundreds, were not only Thailand's worst riots in 18 years. They may have taken the country a step closer to the worst-case scenario in its five-year-old crisis: a fissure in the military along social and political fault lines dividing the country.

Although the city has since calmed down, tens of thousands of anti-government 'red shirt' protesters remain on the streets of Bangkok demanding Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva dissolve parliament. Analysts say that large numbers of soldiers of lower ranks and some senior officers have long sympathised with the mostly rural and working-class 'red shirt' movement behind more than a month of protests demanding immediate elections.

Many of the military's top brass are at the other end of the political spectrum, allied with royalists, business elites and the urban middle classes who wear yellow or pink at counter-protests and broadly back the 16-month-old government.

An army official who asked not to be identified said many mid-ranked and senior officers allied with Thaksin during his 2001-2006 administration were sidelined, and are now throwing their weight behind the 'red shirts' to win power back.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Cracks appearing in Thai military?

Friday, 29 January 2010
By Martin Petty
Reuters


A grenade attack on the office of Thailand’s army chief this month is stoking fears of a worst-case scenario in Thailand’s political crisis – a possible fissure in the military along fault lines that have divided the country.

Analysts, diplomats and military sources say it is premature to talk of a split in Thailand’s powerful and politicized army but that festering ideological differences show signs of broadening in one of the most charged climates in decades.

A divide in an institution central to Thailand’s power structure would deepen uncertainty over the outlook for Thailand’s export-dependent $260 billion economy, Southeast Asia’s second-largest, and raise the prospect of instability in a country seen as a gateway to the region for foreign companies.

Large numbers of soldiers of lower ranks and some senior officers, analysts say, are sympathizers of Thailand’s rural, grassroots anti-government, red-shirted protest movement.

In contrast, many of the military’s top brass are at the other end of the political spectrum, allied with royalists, business elites and the urban middle classes, who wear yellow at protests and largely support the present government.

The red-yellow divide is growing increasingly intractable.

And Thailand’s markets remain vulnerable to a correction, after benefiting from waves of foreign money moving into the Asian emerging markets that rebounded first from the global crisis. The stock market is off its January highs but is still up around 85 percent from the lows it hit in November 2008.

“When there is chaos and the country is divided, people look to the military to be in control,” said a Bangkok-based security analyst, who asked not to be identified because discussions of the military are sensitive.

“But it’s the first time in a generation that we’ve seen military divisions like this. There’s definitely an ideological split. It’s unlikely there’s any danger just yet, but that all depends on where this crisis will go.”

The Jan. 15 attack on army chief Anupong Paochinda’s office – he was not there at the time – and the apparent attempt to cover it up, have eroded public confidence in the military, polls show. Although there were no injuries, the brazen attack was widely seen as a challenge to Anupong’s authority.

Rogue soldier

The authorities’ reluctance to arrest their prime suspect, a rogue major general openly allied with an anti-government movement, has raised questions about how the army perceives his influence among parts of the rank-and-file.

The infamous Khattiya Sawasdipol – a maverick, self-proclaimed warrior better known as “Seh Daeng” – is dismissed by his critics as a loud-mouthed attention-seeker. But he enjoys a cult-like following among some soldiers and has made bold public threats to Anupong, warning him of a “gang attack.”

Khattiya is also a close associate of exiled former premier Thaksin Shinawatra, a twice-elected billionaire ousted in a 2006 coup and the assumed leader of the opposition Puea Thai party and the “red shirt” protest movement – both of which seek to topple Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva’s military-backed government.

“This government has survived because of the military,” added the security expert. “Without its support, it would have tanked.”

The military played a pivotal role in brokering the ruling coalition government to keep Thaksin at bay. But the six-party alliance is looking vulnerable, facing internal divisions of its own and lacking enough popular support to win an election.

That raises questions over what the military and its backers would do if the government falls and if Thaksin’s allies, who they have fought hard to sideline, wrestle back power through an election win for his Puea Thai party.

Convicted of graft while in self-imposed exile, Thaksin is very much back in the picture, forming a provocative alliance with neighbouring Cambodia’s prime minister, Hun Sen, and rallying supporters from just over the border.

Thaksin’s opponents say he is disloyal to revered 82-year-old King Bhumibol Adulyadej. Thaksin says his conviction was politically motivated and insists he supports the monarchy.

Adding to the combustible political mix is the question of succession of the ageing king, who has been hospitalized since Sept. 19, and whether an eventual change of monarch would lead to a change in the balance of power in the military, which has traditionally been closely aligned with the palace.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Thailand's bloody Muslim insurgency deeply rooted

Saturday, April 18, 2009
By DENIS D. GRAY

PATTANI, Thailand (AP) — While Thai authorities are preoccupied with riots in the capital, a five-year-old Muslim uprising in the south of the country is intensifying, and Thailand's troubled government and army are at odds about how to deal with it.

The bombings, shootings and beheadings show no signs of quieting. Machine-gun mounted Humvees scour for roadside bombs, soldiers sweep through villages suspected of harboring the insurgents and helicopters clatter above an idyllic, tropical landscape over which authorities have cast a security net more dense in terms of area and population than in Iraq.

The toll has risen to more than 3,400 dead and some 5,600 injured as the shadowy rebels pursue an ill-defined agenda that sometimes seems to call for an Islamic state separate from Buddhist-dominated Thailand, but is mostly a reaction to a history of discrimination.

Last month, in a surge-style operation, 4,000 more soldiers were added to a security force of 60,000 already in the three southern provinces.

But stalked by years of failed military efforts, the government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva is considering less military-focused options including lifting martial law and emergency decrees in the restive provinces, and reviving councils that once allowed Muslims more say in local matters.

But Abhisit is hamstrung. His energies have been absorbed by the mass demonstrations in Bangkok that are unrelated to the insurgency, and his political future is far from assured. And to an extent, he owes his premiership to a military that doesn't want to cede such powers as holding of suspects for up to 30 days without trial.

"Even if Abhisit knows exactly what he ought to do in the south he hasn't got a lot of power over these (military) guys. To move to a political situation you need to reduce the military's dominance and demilitarize the problem to some degree. But he isn't strong enough to launch a civilian-political offensive," says Duncan McCargo, author of the recent book on the insurgency, "Tearing Apart the Land."

Critics of government policy say causes of the southern crisis are too deeply rooted to be destroyed militarily, stemming from a history of governments that distrust the Muslims and don't regard them as "real Thais."

"The way they deal with us, press down on our youth, just makes young men more anti-government. They become more violent and go into the jungle to fight," says Nomee Yapa, whose father, a village imam, died in military custody. A court ruled last December that he had been tortured to death.

The complaints, even from moderate Muslim leaders, range from search patrols barging into homes to officials sneering at them for speaking their dialect of Malay, rather than Thai.

"We can't be ourselves anymore. Anything we do is suspect — a meeting among four or five friends, or just games. They even come into Quran classes for children to take photographs," says Nomee. The schoolteacher says that virtually every young man in Ko To village has been taken into temporary custody for questioning.

The military has been under intense pressure to take whatever measures necessary to suppress the violence, which includes terror tactics like beheadings and attacks on temples widely seen as intended to drive Buddhists from the area. Queen Sirikit, wife of the constitutional monarch, King Bhumibol Adulyadej — who usually keeps clear of public remarks about matters of state — spoke out several times of the need for protection.

Now, the military says it is adopting less aggressive tactics.

"We are doing much more to reach the people, to get closer to them. We are trying to forge more bonds with the villagers. We use martial law power only when necessary to deal with the insurgents." said Maj. Gen. Saksin Klansnoh, the Pattani task force commander.

He estimated the insurgents numbered only 3,000-6,000 out of a population of 1.8 million, more than 70 percent of them Muslim, in the provinces of Pattani, Yala and Narathiwat. These border Malaysia and are about half the size of Israel or New Jersey.

Saksin said violent incidents in Pattani dropped by 40 percent from October 2008 to March 2009, and independent analysts agree that attacks subsided overall last year as the military rounded up suspects and arrested some bomb makers.

But Srisompob Jitpiromsri, who tracks the numbers at Pattani's Prince of Songkhla University, said violent incidents began to rise again this year with some 100 in March — the highest monthly figure since 2007.

Remotely detonated road side explosives, drive-by shootings and, more recently, car bombs target both Buddhist authorities and Muslims suspected of siding with the state, along with innocents of both sides. There were nine beheadings in February.

"This indicates that the military approach failed to win hearts and minds," the political scientist said. "The military can disrupt the insurgents, block their movements, but it cannot fully control the situation. The insurgents can pick and choose their targets at any time, any place."

Even a superb military — and Thailand's southern forces have been widely criticized for incompetence — would find the insurgency a formidable challenge.

Into its fifth year, the insurgency has yet to reveal either its leaders or concrete aims. It appears to operate in small, fluid cells which have little direct contact with leaders of several shadowy organizations, principally the BRN-C, or National Revolutionary Front-Coordinate. Out of either sympathy or fear, the local population rarely points out the rebels to authorities.

"Sometimes we know who the leaders are but we don't have the evidence to bring them in. We have the same problems as the Americans in Iraq — to identify the insurgents from among the majority of people who are good," said Saksin.

Although some of their leaflets are couched in the rhetoric of holy war, the insurgents don't launch suicide bombers, stage attacks outside the south or target foreigners. Their goals appear local and limited.

McCargo cautions against linking the insurgency to al-Qaida and global jihad. That could happen, he says, "but it hasn't happened until now."

Attempts at negotiations have been halfhearted at best. Some Muslims suggest foreign mediation. Others suggest a form of autonomy, noting the region was an independent sultanate until it became part of Thailand in 1902.

Srisompob sees a hope that young, upwardly mobile southerners will moderate the crisis, provided they are allowed to maintain their Islamic traditions.

Worawit Baru, a prominent Muslim senator from Pattani, says the government simply doesn't understand the region's problems.

"This part of Thailand is so very different from all the others," he says. "You cannot deny history, culture. You cannot ignore 100 years, but this they don't understand."