Preah Vihear dispute weighs on army brass

Bangkok Post, May 24, 2012

The uncertain situation on the border with Cambodia could be why the army will enjoy the largest chunk of the defence budget in the next fiscal year.

Supreme Commander Gen Tanasak Patimapakorn, left, and Royal Thai Armed Forces’ Chief of Staff Gen Worapong Sa-nganet, second right, are the two key men handling the Preah Vihear issue. WASSANA NANUAM

The defence budget in the 2013 budget bill is set at 180 billion baht, 88.8 billion of which is earmarked for the army alone. Most of the army budget _ 87.45 billion baht _ will be used for security preparations on the front lines with all neighbours with a focus on the eastern neighbour, as both are entangled in the controversy over the Preah Vihear issue. The International Court of Justice is expected to rule on the sovereignty of disputed land around the Hindu temple early next month.

The government, led by the Pheu Thai Party and Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, is on good terms with Cambodia due to amicable ties between her brother Thaksin and Cambodian leader Hun Sen, after rocky relations persisted during the previous administration.

Part of the budget will be used to bolster cooperation, including meetings, formal and informal visits, and humanitarian and military aid for Thailand's neighbours. But a source at the Defence Ministry said other objectives of future spending will be geared towards border security preparations with the priority area having been set on the Thai-Cambodian border.

Army chief Gen Prayuth Chan-ocha has ordered the 2nd Army Region and the Suranaree Task Force to stay alert even before the 2013 budget, now in parliament, is approved by lawmakers. The navy and air force also are ready in case border clashes resume.

Thailand's military budget is small compared to other Southeast Asian nations.

"Our defence budget cannot match that in many countries like Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia or Myanmar," the source said. "Their defence budgets are around 5% of GDP. Ours in 2013 is only 1.44%, although we should get up to 2% of GDP."

The budget includes no allocations for new arms purchases, the source said.

Another military source on the border with Cambodia said around 2,000 troops from each side are stationed in the area near Preah Vihear with no signs of cuts. The only obvious moves are when the two countries rotate their personnel to keep soldiers fresh as they never know what will happen in the future.

Cambodia has conducted a military exercise deep inside its frontier and Thailand undertook its Command Post Exercise with the participation of all three armed forces plus the Royal Thai Armed Forces _ formerly known as the Supreme Command _ last month and two more will be held next month and in July. "We have no intention to stage a war with anyone. We only make ourselves ready in all areas because we have no idea what our neighbours, particularly Cambodia, have in mind," a source at the Royal Thai Armed Forces said.

Thailand has reason to worry as a troop withdrawal from the area claimed by the two countries has not taken place despite an injunction from the World Court until the ruling is handed down. That could make Phnom Penh unhappy, which might interpret the move as an attempt by the Thai Army to drag its feet on this issue.

The army's reluctance is making the government uncomfortable and that was reflected in the Foreign Ministry's position which called on the army to strictly follow the court's temporary order for fear that failing to do so could paint a negative image of Thailand as a "bad boy", which could possibly affect the court's decision next year. But a source at the Defence Ministry said "the army will follow the court's direction because we want to be a 'good boy'. But we have procedures to do it."

In an attempt to restore peace between the two countries, Asean has already agreed to send Indonesian observers into the disputed area.

Supreme Commander Tanasak Patimapakorn, serious about the dispute, is paying extra attention to the Joint Working Group (JWG) which is negotiating the issue with Cambodia. He selected Worapong Sa-nganet, his close friend at the Armed Forces Academics Preparatory School's Class 12, who is the Royal Thai Armed Forces' chief of staff, to be the team leader in the group. The first meeting with Cambodia was held on April 4-5 in Bangkok with Cambodian Deputy Defence Minister Nieng Pad as the counterpart to Gen Tanasak. But the maiden talks did not touch on a troop withdrawal, and the only outcome was an agreement to clear landmines in the area.

The decision to omit the troop withdrawals may have been due to better ties between the two countries. That was reflected in Gen Tanasak's statement made at the armed forces leaders' meeting on the border issue at the air force head office last week. "Ties between Thailand and Cambodia have been improving over the past nine or 10 months. What happened before that was an accident. Now we can talk and clear up any doubts," he said.

"If the policy of the Foreign Ministry and the government is to allow Indonesian observers to observe the situation, the armed forces will do it. But the best way is to see the two countries talk it over first," he added.

The army's reluctance stems in part from military leaders wanting to avoid going down in history as the ones responsible for withdrawing troops or giving up land claimed by Thailand.

Gen Tanasak has said the Indonesian observers are not needed.

Once they are there, Thailand will have to ask for permission to enter the area and that implicitly means Thailand has lost its territory, he said.

This issue is expected to be high on the agenda when Defence Minister ACM Sukumpol Suwanatat meets privately with Hun Sen during the Asean Defence Minister Meeting in Phnom Penh on Monday and Tuesday, although the main issue at the talks is the signing of an agreement to foster unity and security cooperation to build trust among the bloc's 10 members.

A source said the Southeast Asian defence ministers will set up the National Centre for Peacekeeping Force, Mine and Explosive Remnants of War Clearance to showcase how serious Cambodia is in clearing landmines in the disputed area in line with the JWG's agreement last month. Gen Worapong said the second JWG meeting will be held soon in Phnom Penh after Gen Nieng Pad sets the date to turn the mine clearance deal into reality.

Ties between the two countries are smooth due to close relations between leaders in Bangkok and Phnom Penh. But the different approaches of the Thai government and the armed forces on the troops in the area near Preah Vihear could become a big issue as military leaders have vowed to protect sovereignty over the disputed land. The issue could even become controversial in the future if the People's Alliance for Democracy moves against the attempt to withdraw soldiers from the area.

My Letter to Samdech Ta Norodom Sihanouk

My Letter to Samdech Ta N. Sihanouk,

From analytical analysis's point of view, Samdech Ta is just a Father of himself and remote Cambodian farmers in current Cambodia politics. But in reality, real Samdech Ta's flesh and bone have already been fleshed out by Hun Sen. There is analogy study of Taksin Shinawatra who has tried to de-popularize Thai King Phumibol in the meantime that Hun Sen is trying to de-popularize Khmer King Sihanouk.

It is logical to the concept of political competition that "one cave should exist only one tiger". The cave of political popularity cannot be two in the political arena.

I am really appreciate with the political narrative Samdech Ta recalls during his heyday. Of course, Somdech Ta's information is useful for younger generation like me and other Cambodian friends. Personally, I have learned about Somdech Ta's political career at least from few different sources:

• 1. From the elders who admired Somdech Ta as their hero and extraordinary man in their life span. Some elders boasted themselves about their lucky to see Samdech Ta in person, some boasted themselves about their lucky to have touched Samdech Ta's hand and they felt cold, tender and unforgettable etc. Some elders boasted about their lucky to get white scarf as their precious gift from Samdech Ta. They also showed me this white scarf as it is still kept in their sacred alter to worship. There are many other extraordinary appearances, words and kindness about Samdech Ta.

When I was young, I dream of Samdech Ta's face and kindness as he is named "Samdech Euy". We are his Koun Chao (children & grand children) has to pay respect and be humble to him.

In that time, I was too amazed by the fame and narratives told by the elders.

• 2. I learned about Somdech Ta from school. It is unbelievable that though Samdech Ta sided with Pol Pot to fight against CPP along the Cambodia-Thai border. The text book in that time condemned only Pol Pot, Ieng Sary and Kiev Samphan as the main devils. This hatred propaganda spread entirely and it had always seduced the young adults to go carry guns and kill all those Khmer Rouge leaders. However, I learned at school is not different from the narrative of elders about Samdech Ta. Samdech Ta's figure was always exceptional.

• 3. I learned about Samdech Ta from my own research and reading. Many analytical books describe Samdech Ta in different volumes. However, their intellectual and analytical writing has left some significant remarks about Samdech Ta N. Sihanouk:

• 3.1. He is a king father, the universal monarchy of Cambodians. He is the hero of war, peace and uncertainty. He is also the King, the prime minister, the prisoner, the singer, dancer, movie maker, and blogger. He is also the father of independence as well as the father of Khmer Rouge brutality.

• 3.1. He is the populist and demagogic political leader, the sweetest public speaker, the flip-flopper, the manipulator, the cheater, and the revenged...etc

• 3.2. He has played a great role model as a Cambodian political leader who has always used populist strategy, anti-democratic principle, violence-prone leadership style, and personal-centric decision making etc

• 3.3. Many later Cambodian leaders have used the style of King Father as their role model. For example, current Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen has copied almost every aspect of leadership from Samdech Ta namely using his so-called personal funds to build schools, roads, bridges, hospitals, and temples by inscribing his name and spouse there.

Like elders told me, Samdech Ta is very kind because he gave all his personal property from the smallest gifts to the building of national infrastructures such as schools, roads, hospitals and temples etc. Now, elders have not mentioned this charity activity referring to Samdech Ta anymore, peoples have always admired Prime Minister Hun Sen for his charity activities. So, we can see the Samdech Ta and Prime Minister Hun Sen have used the same strategy to legitimize the power. But what is new for all of us is the political shift changing from Monarchical Charity to Ordinary People Charity (or from King Sihanouk to ordinary Hun Sen).

Will Cambodia live with this leadership style to another unpredictable years or not? Cambodia will be better through this leadership example or not?

Samdech Ta is not different from Hun Sen and his team works who have always used the same political rhetoric. For instance, they said "Pol Pot desired to get Khmer Krom back that why Vietnam attacked them, Cambodian people in abroad are good in speaking but have done nothing to Cambodian nation, the speakers are good in speaking but the doers are still doing to care Cambodia nation", or many other rhetoric which is considered childish rhetoric to fool the Cambodian farmers.

This simple childish rhetoric has been used since the reign of Samdech Ta, and it has been continually used by Lon Nol, Pol Pot, and current Hun Sen.

So, how long this childish rhetoric will be used in Cambodia politics? To be a good Cambodian leaders, do this rhetoric is important or nonsense?

From analytical analysis's point of view, Samdech Ta is just a Father of himself and remote Cambodian farmers in current Cambodia politics. But in reality, real Samdech Ta's flesh and bone have already been fleshed out by Hun Sen. There is analogy study of Taksin Shinawatra who has tried to de-popularize Thai King Phummibol in the meantime that Hun Sen is trying to de-popularize Khmer King Sihanouk.

It is logical to the concept of political competition that "one cave should exist only one tiger". The cave of political popularity cannot be two in the political arena.

But Thaksin is facing difficult challenge, while Hun Sen is freely riding on his victorious seat.

Samdech Ta can spend his last breath to favor whoever has given him a shade as part of Cambodian practice, paying gratitude is authentic. But Samdech Ta has also faced the reality that this shade is not a genuine shade for him any more.

I wish Samdech Ta can see this reality and do something meaningful for his last blink in this world.

KY