To Lords of Poverty, aka Eccc the Clown

How can I not [feel offended]?! The honor of my father and mother is at stake. My dignity is at stake. I can speak as a lawyer on a professional level, but this is a deeply personal issue for me. I am both within and without... I am highly offended when the UN is effectively telling me, telling the other victims that all we, the poor Cambodians, deserve are the crumbs of justice... The UN is embedding all the dark mentalities we want to change in this society - the mentality of low expectations, the mentality of fear, the mentality of inferiority, the mentality of impunity, the mentality of cynicism... And yes, I agree with the opening statement of Nuon Chea's lawyer--the indictment of this ECCC--minus all the references to Nuon Chea, the one that was never made but sent out as a press release... I believe that guilt is not zero-sum; that is to say, Kissinger is guilty and his guilt does not absolve the guilt of Nuon Chea; he's still directly, personally responsible...

- Theary Seng, Nov. 2011

First published in May/June 2008 in The Phnom Penh Post as part of the Voice of Justice columns. Of my travels and extensive living outside Cambodia, I have never witnessed elsewhere such the degree of upside-down modus operandi for daily functioning as I do here in Cambodia. Many times the people who are obstructionists and create obstacles are the people who should know better (both foreigners and Khmers), not the "ignorant" people of the villages I hear people blaming; they are people who lack generosity of spirit or they have enough information, even intelligence, but lacking wisdom. Currently, the Lords of Poverty roam and strut among us here in Cambodia armed with great resources to do damage, and in the process taint the image of those who actually are doing commendable work. Through personal experience, I am against private company acting as the clearinghouse of millions of aid dollars for local NGOs. These clearinghouses have no incentive to do humanitarian work. On the contrary, they do everything to make themselves indispensable; that is to say, they use their position to acquire knowledge of local NGOs and in turn, use that knowledge to divide the NGOs to further justify their existence; these private companies have the greater incentive to give the grants to mediocre NGOs and disparage the successful ones, again to make their existence necessary: "See, how divisive and incompetent these NGOs are and how we necessary." Also, I want to emphasize that the percentage of foreign consultants should be reduced in favor of local hires... With a little bit of patience and wisdom, a local consultant can be had for a fraction of the salary of the foreign consultant. More than that, it works against the mentality of genuine capacity-building. People who are of integrity and genuine in their observations would readily agree with me that current foreign assistance and practice of hiring are inadvertently embedding the culture of dependency and the Lords of Poverty.

- Theary Seng, Jan. 2010

LORDS OF POVERTY
Enablers of Hypocrisy and Mismanagement

Let's keep that pointing finger at the government accountable; however, let's also focus on the three other fingers pointing back at us. Let's focus on the hypocrisy and outrageousness of the do-gooders – donors and civil society – in light of other dark, societal norms.

Societal norms

What arc some societal norms darkening current Cambodia? And who are the enablers of these darkening norms?

Outrageous behavior

We live in a society where outrageous behavior – by us Khmer and foreigners alike – is the norm. As donors, civil society and other "do-gooders", we enable this outrageousness, and sometimes engage in it with full confidence that we can get away with it. Take for example the event of this past Thursday at CSD where "good people" hired armed Ministry of Interior police to exact emotional violence (that easily could have turned into physical violence) on staff and others. Where do we even begin in pointing out the countless, irregular, illegal, "undue process" and outrageousness of this act?

The more outrageous acts are the norm, the more dense and obtuse we become; the less we are able to hear and understand, the more outrageous we become. It's an upward, vicious, spiraling cycle of raising the volume. "We" in this regard includes both us Khmer and foreigners.

Disproportionate reaction

Disproportionate reaction is the norm. Instead of reacting to these outrageous acts with outrage, we stay mute; we claim neutrality; or, we smile and laugh and shake our heads at the Cambodians or the crazy foreigners hiding in Cambodian society. We are so used to the outrageous (which is beyond our scope to exact control) that in order to still feel we do have sensibility, we over-react to the minutiae where in light of the totality of circumstances, it has no significance. This is why killers of millions are permitted to get away with murder and are still held in awe.

(As an aside, I'd like to make a distinction between fairness and neutrality, as they are often used interchangeably. If one is a stakeholder and has adequate information, one can no longer claim inaction as neutrality and not enable the other side. Neutrality is reserved for 3rd parties who are not in the know, nor should have interests in knowing. But to be inactive or not take a stance as a stakeholder with sufficient information is to not neutral but to inadvertently and foolishly be enabling. As I often tell my staff: As your boss. I want to be and will be fair; I do not want and will not be neutral. If one staff brings to me shoddy work, and another excellent work, do not think I will remain neutral and not make a distinction. To the contrary, if I do not praise excellence and be indifferent or dismissive of mediocrity, I am being unfair to the one who worked hard and produced excellence, and stripped all incentives for future excellence. Fairness relates to using the same measuring stick; neutrality relates to information and how far or close we are to a situation.)

Another aspect of disproportionate reaction that is a societal norm relates to the interaction between a Cambodian and a Westerner. Generally speaking, a Cambodian is passive and deferential; the Westerner assertive/aggressive and overbearing. This unbalanced equation creates a norm whereby a Cambodian will always be at a disadvantage in relation to her foreign counterpart - in a discussion, in a negotiation, in a relationship.

Empty verbiage

We Khmers are still lacking in sophistication as our verbiage too often arc viscerally empty and crude; they are understood as such and accepted as norms. We function at this level of the reality of unreality.

Foreigners are more sophisticated in masking their empty verbiage. But sophistication is only a higher art-form of facade, superficiality. One example of how foreigners have normalized the empty rhetoric is in the area of "capacity-building" or "local ownership". Foreign donors "train" and train and train and train on ownership, on building local capacity because it sounds good and right; just don't "do" ownership, as that competes into their terrain; competes into their survival; they need to justify their existence through the "incompetence", the "divisiveness" of the local NGOs, the local Cambodians. The growing pool of highly capable Cambodians is swept away by these generalizations to their detriment.

Envy

We are so envious of excellence and success and do nothing to strive toward them but rather expend our energy in being in a state of envy. If only envy could stay within the self and not spill into destructive, obstructive behavior of gossip and tearing down.

Mistrust, distrust

Mistrust arises from misrepresentation, from a disregard for the sentiments of the affected individuals or groups. It also arises from political spin. We Khmer must be more careful of this in light our culture of fear, secrecy and the paranoid produced by the Khmer Rouge years and other regimes since.

Dependency, perpetuate "Lords of Poverty" mentality

Perpetuating the status quo is perpetuating poor governance, perpetuating mismanagement, perpetuating a "lords of poverty" mentality.

In 1993, yes 99% of foreign consultants were justified; now, 5% are justifiable. The others are embedding and enabling the mentality of dependency.

Ownership – how many local NGOs are truly "owned" by that director or senior staff? Many are run (behind the scenes) by consultants and sometimes ambitious/over exuberance 2nd year law students who have the legal expertise but cannot "feel" the situation nor understand the larger vision of what is Cambodia and "Cambodian".

Disincentives of reform

The societal norms mentioned above are disincentives of genuine reform and change.

The way we at CSD try to fight against these darkening societal norms is by encouraging a little bit of attitude among the staff. Strike that. We encourage a lot of attitude. With a lot of heart. It is the necessary first step toward ownership and social development.

____________________
Theary C. SENG
Founding President
CIVICUS: Center for Cambodian Civic Education
(column written when she was executive director of now-defunct Center for Social Development)