Thursday, January 03, 2013

With Election on the Horizon, Politicians Defend Land Policies

National parliamentary elections are scheduled for July 28, and Cambodia’s land problems are emerging as a key issue.

by Sok Khemara, VOA Khmer  
03.01.2013 

WASHINGTON DC - Cambodian politicians have begun a public campaign to defend their records on land policies, as they prepare for the run-up to July elections.

Politicians from the ruling Cambodian People’s Party, as well as the opposition Sam Rainsy and Human Rights parties, have said they will give free land titles and not take land or tax from farmers.

But Cambodia has been plagued with ongoing land grabs, forced evictions and bitter disputes since the last national election, in 2008, and the issue is likely to be a main political battleground in the parliamentary elections.
Candidates for the opposition, which will merge into the Cambodia National Rescue Party for the election, say they do not have policies to tax farmland, but would tax land concessions for local and foreign businesses, which they say will promote the economy, better living standards for Cambodians, and give higher salaries to civil servants and provide retirement funding for people over the age of 65.

“If we do this, we absolutely will not touch the poor,” Kem Sokha, who is currently head of the Human Rights Party, told VOA Khmer by phone from France. “We would only help the poor. Not only won’t we tax farmers, but we’ll also protect their land for them.”

Son Chhay, a lawmaker for the Sam Rainsy Party, said a tax can be applied to 99-year leases on land concessions from foreign investors or powerful local interests.

“If Cambodia leases for 99 years, we need $70 a year per hectare of land,” he said. “We ask that the government do it quickly, because the government cannot allow businessmen who hold millions of hectares of deforested land to sell land worth hundreds of millions of dollars—while the Cambodian government gets not one riel from those huge tracts of land.”

Land issues are persistent, and many Cambodians know now of the abuse of land policies, so the ruling party should be concerned, he said. “So the government, especially the ruling party, fears this very much, because it is not a small problem,” he said. “That’s why [Prime Minister Hun Sen] has gradually started to propagandize, in order to overstate the trust, contradicting what we are stressing.”

Ruling party and opposition lawmakers tried to address the 2013 national budget in December, which came to $3 billion, with Cambodia continuing to borrow about a billion dollars a year from the international community. Opposition lawmakers say foreign debt can be reduced by taxing 2.8 million hectares of land concessions, as well as the country 50-some casinos and other revenues. Opposition lawmakers say this can improve civil servant salaries and provide retirement funds. But their recommendations were rejected by ruling party lawmakers in charge of the budget, who said they came too late for this year’s budget.

Meanwhile, Hun Sen said in a public address this week that he will give away land titles and avoid taxing the poor.

“I have declared already that as long as I myself, Hun Sen, exists, and as long as the Cambodian People’s Party exists, the land tax will not be levied on the people,” he said. From the fall of the Khmer Rouge until today, he said, Cambodians have not been taxed, which means they have received money directly.

National parliamentary elections are scheduled for July 28, and Cambodia’s land problems are emerging as a key issue.

But Sok Touch, dean of Khemarak University, told VOA Khmer by phone that a tax on land is necessary in many countries.

“I don’t think farmers have a lot of land to be taxed,” he said. “Those who have a lot of land are powerful people and those who have hundreds of hectares would be impacted.” Decisions not to tax the land are made by politicians looking for votes, he said.
 
 

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Uncle Ho understand that Sam Rainsy as well as Lotus Revolution leaders are so coward and scare to die for your Khmer Nation and Uncle Ho understand that Sam Rainsy and Lotus Revolution leaders are trying so hard to provoke young innocent Cambodians to die for them to be rich but young innocent Cambodians will not die for you people (Sam Rainsy and Lotus Revolution leaders) to be rich anymore as they have learn enough of bullshit lessons from the past and present.

Young innocent Cambodians are so smart not to die creating another opportunity for you people to be rich because they know very well that Sam Rainsy and Lotus Revolution leaders are so coward and scare to die but using them to do the dirty work to create another opportunity for you people (Sam Rainsy and Lotus Revolution leaders) to be rich in government.

If Sam Rainsy and Lotus Revolution leaders are truth patriot, why don't they just come to Cambodia and lead the revolution and dare to die to show young innocent Cambodians, how patriot they are. Why??? Or they are opportunistic who is waiting for opportunity at very safe places and champagnes to pop up.

Prove Uncle Ho wrong by action not by words because our Vietnamese’s hero dare to die to protect Vietnam interest and action speak far better than words that is why We are Vietnamese own Angkor Watt temples and Koh Tral, not by using words but real action and real sacrificed of our heroes with lose count. Unlike Sam Rainsy can’t even find justice for his followers.

Uncle Ho will guarantees that Sam Rainsy and all Lotus Revoltion leaders won’t dare to die for the Khmer because they are so afraid of losing their opportunity to be rich in Cambodia government, once day.

Anonymous said...

Before setting the blame game let look at the "root cause" who have courage as leaders. Hun Sen have courage in killing his peopler (khmer) and protecting illegal Vietnamese immigrate. While Sam Rainsy is victimised from make aware of Vietnamese boarder encroachment. Without his voice we won't know what vietnam did and I dont thing he is scared. If the game is played fairly between Hun Sen and Sam Rainsy on all levels i think Sam Rainsy is a clear winner. He is not a PHD but he care more on national insterests and Khmer people while Hun Sen care more on raising money to but vote and he is asking all CPP member to contribute $60,000 each to buy votes and fake the election results. Sam Rainsy on the other hand is not in Cambodia during the 2013 election and does not have the ability to raise funds to buy vote like Hun Sen have.... purely support from Khmer Childrens. I dont thin Khmer childrens should die for any politic parties but more so for their current and future national interest where is relevant to do so...and staying alive and keeping themself well informed and educated is a good starting point. And if a government manage to recover tax revenue to build a strong country it a good start as you cant live on donations or borrow money forever!!