Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Political Prostitutes: From championing for the victims' cause to serving the oppressors, the defectors claim that their former parties are no good

Monday, February 11, 2008
Editorial by Khmerization
Originally posted at:

http://khmerization.blogspot.com/2008/02/political-prostitues-from-championing.html
"The hypocrisy and the behaviour of such people are no different from the prostitutes- in fact they are political prostitutes......Political prostitution is the cheapest profession that should be avoided."
The three defectors, Ahmed Yahya, Sok Pheng and Ngor Sovann, reported in the article below have shamed themselves and their families. While purporting to enter politics for the cause of the nation and that of the poor people's, they now have joined the very people whom they have accused of being the nation's destroyers. They joined the devils to seek personal fortunes because they have lost the confidence of their party colleagues. They have sold out their soul and betrayed the very ideals and the very people that they have purported to represent. The hypocrisy and the behaviour of such people are no different from the prostitutes- in fact they are political prostitutes. But such people are worst than prostitutes because prostitutes are only selling their bodies but these kinds of politicians are people who are unashamedly prostituting their souls and political ideals. Political prostitution is the cheapest profession that should be avoided. In the West people never deserted their parties to defect to another party when they got upset with their colleagues or faced internal discipline. They just leave the party and retire quietly.

Ahmed Yahya was once a champion of democracy and the poor people. After the 1997 coup he lied low and seemed to resign to his fate as a political lame duck. When he joined the Sam Rainsy Party after the 2003 election he had become some sort of a political dead meat- very inactive. Sok Pheng is a young rising star in the Sam Rainsy Party. He had championed many causes. So it is regrettable to see such a fine young politician had turned into some sort of a cheap political tool of a party he once strongly opposed.

I believe strongly that after these many defections the Sam Rainsy Party will rise to its strongest position ever, because the defections of such people would leave rooms for grassroots people to move in. Also such defections would mean that the Sam Rainsy Party have gotten rid of the spies and traitors. Giving grassroots people an opportunity to actively participate in the democratic process and getting rid of the party's traitors would sure improve the party's image.

The sorry state of Cambodian politics is that one can only see one way of defections- and that is from the opposition parties to the ruling Cambodian People's Party(CPP). This is because the opposition parties are democratic parties whereby their members are free to move to any parties without fearing for their life. On the other hand, those from the CPP who wanted to defect to the opposition parties didn't dare to do so because if they do they will pay with their life.

Coming back to the three defectors, one would want to wish them good luck. But the fact is that they would regret it because the communist CPP would never trust them to give them any important positions of authority. Many defectors before them such as Hor Sopheap, Phy Thach and many more have returned back to the Sam Rainsy Party after languishing in the political wilderness for nearly four years without getting any reward or plum jobs. I just wish that these three defectors would not come back to knock on Sam Rainsy's door after being trashed by the CPP when it no longer needed them.

6 comments:

Khmer Young said...

This is awesome!

This is supper awesome!

This is supper awesome voice to all democratic political activists!

KY

Anonymous said...

maybe this is a hint to exam oneself to see what's the flaw and correct it before too late?

Anonymous said...

I would offer to suggest these ideas to SRP to balance all defectors:

- Although SRP respect wishes of those who defect, SRP should issue strong critics of defection (burn the bridge) except SRP will reserve the door open in case they return back.
-open the weak and soft spots of the defector wound to for receiving party.
-Gathering grassroots in the area of MP defection to vote to show their expression.
- Call for a meeting of the remaining MP to express their wishes regading this issue and formulate ideas into policy for the future.

When the defection takes place , it is extremely difficult to put a brake on the defectors to change their minds but what SRP can do is to follow their footsteps that they left behind and put every thing in public (for all members of SRP) to know their dirty scummed bags. If the defection is for a real good cause then SRP will get flashback.

Anonymous said...

"Who you are speaks so loudly I can't hear what you are saying."
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Conservative

Anonymous said...

Dear Editorial Khmerization

"In the West people never deserted their parties to defect to another party when they got upset with their colleagues or faced internal discipline. They just leave the party and retire quietly".

Can reassure you that this practice is exist in the West as well but may be not in the head line as the case in Cambodia. Of course, there were members of certain political party resigning from their former party and join with other, while other members of the party made secret donation to opposition party Etc..

Personal point of view, while exercising one right during voting whether it is a commune or general election, one shall only ask themselves "Do I truly make the right choice based on my conscious, my belief or simply go with the flow because it would not change".

Why one should ask themselves such a question?

Again the personal view, it proved in the past that people who wearing a party shirt didn't really vote for the party they belonged to and instead simply given their vote to other party.

Ballot is a secret paper and so does your choice.

Anonymous said...

I agree with editorial comment 100%.
For politician who has deserted from their party and join with another party, that is not a politician because he or she has no integrity and no high principle. Indeed in any country, each party is different from the other of their principle, their social valuation, their economic valuation, their policies. Therefore, if a person of one political party can change to another party, that mean that person do not really interest in the policies of each party but rather to risk for a good position and for a good fortune. Areak Prey