Saturday, June 14, 2008

CAMBODIA: Unlawful arrest of a newspaper editor in Phnom Penh

11 June 2008
Source: Asian Human Rights Commission - Urgent Appeals Programme

ISSUES: Freedom of expression and information; administration of justice

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) is deeply concerned that Dam Sith, the editor of Moneaksekar Khmer newspaper, was arrested on charges of alleged defamation, insult and disinformation on 8 June 2008. Dam has been facing a criminal lawsuit after his newspaper published an opposition politician's remarks about the Khmer Rouge affiliation of a government minister in April 2008.

CASE DETAILS: (Sources: Ms Meas Chan Kanha, Dam Sith's wife; Pech Norak, Moneaksekar Khmer Newspaper; Chou Chung Ngy, Dam Sith's defence lawyer)

On Sunday, 8 June 2008 at around 11:30am 10 military police officers, some in uniform and the others in plain clothes, arrested Dam Sith, 39, editor of the Moneaksekar Khmer (Khmer Conscience) newspaper, at a car wash named Meas Sitha, in Tuol Sanke commune, Tuol Kok district, in Phnom Penh. Dam was taken to the Military Police Headquarters in Tuol Kok for questioning. At around 3pm he was brought before the Municipal Court of Phnom Penh.

In court, after questioning Dam in the presence of his lawyer late that afternoon, the investigating judge, Chhay Kong, issued an order to remand him in custody at Prey Sar prison on the outskirts of Phnom Penh for pre-trail detention. The judge's reasons for Dam's pre-trial detention were (1) to prevent any harassment of witnesses or victims or prevent any agreement between him and any accomplice; and (2) to guarantee his appearance in court. He was charged with alleged defamation, insult and disinformation.

Dam's arrest followed a criminal lawsuit against him filed on 25 April by Hor Nam Hong, current Cambodian Foreign Minister following his newspaper's publication, in its 18 April 2008 issue, of the remarks made by Sam Rainsy, leader of the opposition Sam Rainsy Party (SRP) about the Khmer Rouge affiliation of two current government ministers. Sam had made these remarks the day before at a religious ceremony commemorating the death of nearly two million people under Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge regime between 1975 and 1979. Dam's newspaper subsequently published stories related to the same remarks and a criminal lawsuit filed by a concerned minister against Sam.

In its 18 April issue, Moneaksekar Khmer wrote, among other things, that "Mr. Sam Rainsy said further that there are at least a senior minister and a deputy prime minister of the current ruling party who used to be Pol Pot's secretary and advisor-interpreter. Mr. Sam Rainsy added that now Pol Pot's advisor and secretary, Mr. Keat Chhun, is (current) senior minister of economics and finance, and another person, Mr. Hor Nam Hong, (current) deputy prime minister and minister of foreign affairs, used to be head of (Khmer Rouge) Boeung Trabek prison (in Phnom Penh). Being head of Boeung Trabek prison, he (Sam Rainsy) continued, was not just by chance. It required the appointment by the Khmer Rouge to be head of Boeung Trabeck prison as the head of that prison had a lot of power. That was why they (people in the government) did not want the trial of those Khmer Rouge leaders (alluding to the government's repeated delays in organising that trial). They feared Khieu Samphan (a Khmer Rouge leader now awaiting trial) would denounce them. That was why they let the aged Khmer Rouge leaders die naturally so as to prevent them from speaking the truth."

Hor Nam Hong, and not Keat Chhon, filed a criminal lawsuit against Sam Rainsy on 22 April and also against Dam Sith for defamation and disinformation a few days later, on 25 April. On 5 June Dam went to testify as summoned by the court and on 8 June he was arrested and remanded in custody to Prey Sar prison. Sam Rainsy, a Member of Parliament, has neither testified in court as summoned nor been arrested.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

Moneaksekar Khmer newspaper is widely known to be supportive of the opposition Sam Rainsy Party (SRP). It is very critical of government policies, corruption and land grabbing by the rich and powerful. Dam stands in the forthcoming general election to be held on 27 July 2008, as an SRP candidate for Phnom Penh constituency. Dam had faced such a law suit before in September 2006 for exposing alleged corruption of another deputy prime minister (see UA-313-2006).

There is no freedom of the press in Cambodia. Although there has been no lawsuit against journalists for defamation and disinformation for some time, there has still been threats and intimidation against journalists, bans on publications or confiscation of newspapers (see AHRC-UAU-022-2008). On 28 May 2008 the ministry of information cancelled the license granted to a private radio station broadcasting in Kratie province for the sale of its airtime to political parties.

Apart from the court case against the SRP leader, there is another court case pending at the Supreme Court in which another opposition politician, Prince Norodom Ranariddh, leader of yet another self-named Norodom Ranariddh Party, is appealing against his conviction by the Municipal Court of Phnom Penh and the Appeal Court for alleged breach of trust over the management of the assets his former party, FUNCINPEC. Ranariddh has been living in exile since the beginning of the case against him. FUNCINPEC is an ally of the ruling Cambodian People's Party in the current coalition government.

Ranariddh is Prime Minister Hun Sen's arch enemy. Due to this enmity and the executive control of the judiciary, there are allegations that the delay in the Supreme Court's hearing of his case is meant to prevent Ranariddh from returning to Cambodia and compete in the July election.

A characteristic feature of the Cambodian judicial system is judicial inquiry whereby criminal investigation is conducted by judges called investigating judges. The police bring a suspect to the prosecutor who decides whether to lay any charge against him or her. If so, and if the case requires further investigation, the prosecutor sends the case and the accused person to an investigating judge for investigation. This judge then decides whether to remand the accused person in custody awaiting trial (pre-trial detention). Investigating judges can delegate their power to the police to conduct investigation, but not to interrogate accused persons.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) is of the view that there are no legal grounds for Dam's arrest and detention. In the first place, Moneaksekar Khmer's alleged defamatory publication is, if proven, but "false information or imputation" against a "public figure" which the Cambodian Press Law of 1995 (Article 10) treats as "libel" and prohibits. But this law is silent whether libel is a criminal offence. It provides, though, for civil action to get the court to order the press to publish a retraction or pay compensation, or both, on top of the right of the person whose honour or dignity is harmed by false publication to reply, demand retraction form the press and sue it for defamation, libel or humiliation.

However, the Cambodian criminal law, commonly known as UNTAC Law, provides for no such specific criminal offences as libel or humiliation. This law provides for defamation and insult which are punishable by a fine but no custodial sentence. According to the Cambodian Code of criminal Procedure (Article 204), without any charge of a crime punishable by imprisonment for one year or more, a person cannot be detained. Dam Sith's detention is therefore unlawful. It is illegal confinement which is punishable by imprisonment for between 3 and 10 years (UNTAC Law, Article 35).

Apparently, the plaintiff and the investigating judge wanted to lock Dam up so they have charged him with disinformation, which is a practice after the removal of a custodial sentence was removed from defamation and insult in 2006. Disinformation is punishable by imprisonment between 6 months and 3 years.

However, when ordering Dam's pre-trial detention, the judge ignored one of the constitutive elements of the crime of disinformation stipulated under Article 62 on this crime of the UNTAC Law. This article says that the publication, distribution or reproduction (of information which is false, fabricated, falsified or untruthfully attributed to a third person) "has disturbed or is likely to disturb the public peace".

The judge ignored that from the date of the publication of Sam Rainsy's remarks, that is, from 18 April 2008 until the date of Dam Sith's arrest, in Phnom Penh or elsewhere in Cambodia, no "public peace" was "disturbed" in the first, and least of all, there was no disturbance whose cause could be attributed to that publication. The charge of disinformation is groundless.

Dam's detention on this groundless charge is not simply a violation of the general principle of granting freedom to accused persons as clearly spelled out in the same criminal procedure code (Article 203), but is itself unlawful.

Dam Sith's arrest and detention came at a time when preparations for the July election were underway. It can only further compromise this election which has already been marred by the criminal court cases involving two opposition leaders, Sam Rainsy and Ranariddh, and by a series of obstructions to and violence against non-ruling parties. According a group of civil society organizations, during the period of January 2008 - May 2008, there were five cases of political killings, 21 cases of harassment of and threat against party activists and 15 cases of dismantling of party banner signs.

The AHRC is therefore of the view that Dam Sith's arrest and detention are unlawful, violate the constitutional right to press freedom, and comes to mar further the election whose campaign has already been under way.

SUGGESTED ACTION

Please write your letters to the authorities listed below to urge them to immediately release Dam Sith from detention.

The AHRC has also written to the UN Working Group on arbitrary detention and the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression for their intervention in this case.

To support this appeal, please click here:

Sample letter:

Dear ________,

CAMBODIA: Unlawful arrest of a newspaper editor in Phnom Penh

Name of victim: Dam Sith, 39, No. 19A, Street 293, Boeung Kak II commune, Tuol Kok district, Phnom Penh.
The unit who arrested him: The Military Police of the Municipality of Phnom Penh
The court who issued order for his detention: Judge Chhay Kong of the Municipal Court of Phnom Penh
Date and place of his arrest: At 11:30am on 8 June 2008 in Tuol Sanke commune, Tuol Kok district, in Phnom Penh

I am deeply concerned over the arrest of Dam Sith, the editor-in-chief of Moneaksekar Khmer newspaper on 8 June 2008 in Phnom Penh and his subsequent detention in Prey Sar prison on the outskirts of Phnom Penh.

I have learned that the arrest was made following a criminal lawsuit filed on 25 April 2008 by Foreign Minister Hor Nam Hong in the Municipal Court of Phnom Penh. Hor filed this suit against Dam for alleged defamation, insult and disinformation following Moneaksekar Khmer's publication of the remarks made by an opposition leader named Sam Rainsy about Hor's affiliation with the odious Khmer Rouge regime. According to Sam Rainsy, Hor was head of Khmer Rouge Boeuing Trabek prison in Phnom Penh.

However, based on the Cambodian Press Law of 1995, I find no grounds for Dam's arrest and detention. In the first place, the alleged defamatory publication is, if proven, but "false information or imputation" against a "public figure" which that law treats as "libel" and prohibits. But defamation and insult which also cover libel are punishable by a fine only, not by any custodial sentence. Without any charge of a crime with custodial sentence, a person cannot be detained. Dam Sith's detention is therefore unlawful and is illegal confinement.

The charge of disinformation was invoked apparently to have a ground to lock Dam up since disinformation is punishable by imprisonment. But there is no ground for this charge when the publication had not disturbed public peace and there had been no evidence it would do so, as required for this charge under UNTAC Law (Article 62), from the day of that publication to Dam's arrest. The charge of disinformation is also unlawful.

Dam's unlawful arrest and detention have seriously compromised press freedom in Cambodia. They have further added more blight to the general election to be held in the coming month of July, an election which has already been marred by obstructions to and violence against non-rulings, and also by court cases against prominent opposition leaders.

I therefore urge you to release Dam Sith immediately.

I trust you would favourably consider my request.

Yours sincerely,

-------------------
PLEASE SEND YOU LETTERS TO:

1. Mr. Hun Sen
Prime Minister
Cabinet of the Prime Minister
No. 38, Russian Federation Street
Phnom Penh
CAMBODIA
Fax: +855 23 36 0666
Tel: +855 2321 9898
Email: cabinet1b@camnet.com.kh

2. Mr. Sar Kheng
Deputy Prime Minister
Minister of Interior
No.275 Norodom Blvd., Phnom Penh
CAMBODIA
Fax/phone: +855 23 721 905 / 23 726 052 / 23 721 190
Email: info@interior.gov.kh

3. Mr. Tea Banh
Deputy Prime Minister
Minister of National Defence
Russian Federation Street
Phnom Penh
CAMBODIA
Tel: +855-23 883184 / 428171
Fax: +855-23 883184
E-mail: info@mond.gov.kh

4. Mr. Ang Vong Vathna
Minster of Justice
No 240, Sothearos Blvd.
Phnom Penh
CAMBODIA
Fax: +855 23 36 4119 / 21 6622
Email: moj@cambodia.gov.kh

5. Mr. Henro Raken
Prosecutor-General
Court of Appeal
No 240, Sothearos Blvd.
Phnom Penh
CAMBODIA
Fax: +855 23 21 66 22
Tel: +855 11 86 27 70

6. General Hok Lundy
National Police Commissioner
General-Commissariat of National Police
Phnom Penh
CAMBODIA
Fax: +855 23 22 09 52
Tel: +855 23 21 65 85

7. General Sao Sokha
Commander
Military Police
Mao Tse Tung Blvd
Khan Tuol Kok
Phnom Penh
CAMBODIA
Tel: +855 12 36 3636

Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (ua@ahrchk.org)

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Down and Out ! ah Hun Sen, a third-year- elementary-school- educated Prime Minister with 29 years of holding power, is the Criminal against humanity in Cambodia and is a former Khmer Rouge soldier in Khmer Rouge Regime, from CPP (Communist Pro youn Party)

Anonymous said...

Jerk 4:29 AM.

We are in the real world. Money Talks. And for 29 years already how long will you fight with them? Get yourself in the game do the business like Sophan Kith (deceased) now his young brother Meng Kith is Eik Oudom (Billionnaire) in his country. You should do the same if you want to help and have some power.

Some Cambodians complained saying Sok Kong is Youn but he controls Cambodian economy. How about a Cambodian from Kg Cham named Teng Bunma run to Thailand with billion dollars? He once was too in Thailand.

Anonymous said...

what's the juege'snam ? Ah Kon Chkaer? or Ah Khmer hor ma hong yuon's dog?

Anonymous said...

There is nothing unlawful about locking up commies who accusing our leaders as being a Khmer Rouge killer for their own political gain.

Fact of the matter is the CPP were the one to topple the Khmer Rouge and freed millions of Khmer people from slavery. That is far from being a Khmer Rouge killer.

Anonymous said...

Kith Meng is truely having billions dollars. But I heard he lived like a misery man because all of his monies was for Hun Sen. Now his life is numbered. His HIV is going to explose verty soon. He cannot afford to have all his blood change every month at all. THe most he can live is one and half year. His body is starting to show his outbreak of HIV. Whistleblower

Anonymous said...

Please put the person who issued the arrest unlawfully in jail. If he didn't know what he was doing than he is the one that should be going to jail and pay the price for being such a dumb stupid and an asshole!

Anonymous said...

UNTAC Article 62: Disinformation.
(translation from Khmer) The director or other party responsible for a publication or other means of communication who took the decision to publish, distribute or reproduce by any means information which is false, fabricated, falsified or untruthfully attributed to a third person and did so in bad faith and with malicious intent, provided that the publication, distribution or reproduction has distributed or is likely to disturb the public peace, shall be liable to a punishment of six months to three years in prison, a fine of three hundred thousand to three million Riels, or both."
The legal issues to be determined by the investigating judge is whether or not the information published was false, fabricated, falsified or untruthfully attributed to a third person, and whether or not such publication was done in bad faith and with malicious intent.
It appears this is a dispute between a private individual who also holds high government office and a politician and the newspaper that published what has been alleged by the private individual to be false.
What happened here was that the rule of law is working- not people going out and taking the law into their own hands. Article 62 was written into the United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC), by UN lawyers and then subsequently passed into law by the National Assembly. It remains to today, even though some months ago the PM stated that defamation (Article 63) should by civil not criminal.

Anonymous said...

Defamation is universally illegal. Criminal or civil make not difference. It is still illegal. In criminal case, the convict will pay for it with jail time. In civil case, the convict will pay it with big bucks. And then there is the middle ground where the convict do a little of both.

Anonymous said...

the difference is that most countries of the world have defamation as a civil so that you can only be sued for damages. When it's a crime as here under Article 62 and 63, then you are subject to arrest. It's ironic that the UNTAC criminal law was written by foreign lawyers and imposed on Cambodia. when a new criminal law is passed, hopefully it drops defamation as a crime.