Thursday, July 10, 2008

Interview with Theary Seng

Thursday, 10 July 2008
Written by The Phnom Penh Post

1) When did the old board's term expire?

November 2007. Madam Peung Yok Hiep and Mr. Vi Houi never formally renewed their positions. Chea Vannath is NOT, has never been a CSD Board member. All three have expressly said to donors, to consultants, to Organizational Review members, to CSD staff and management that they are not interested in being Board members. Hence, we find their action that much more baffling.

2) Why do you think they are so reluctant to relinquish their positions on the CSD board?
We live in a society where power is status, status is power. They believe that CSD has influence and thus power. Simply put, the answer is power.

When I took on this role of executive director 2 ¼ years ago, I had 28 staff and encountered a tsunami of institutional, historical problems which had been accumulating for at least the last 10 years of mismanagement and a power struggle between 2 heads who hardly spoke with each other - an internal power and the public face. The 4 member Board wanted nothing to do with the historical implosion and was happy to let my staff and me clean up the mess and play the role simultaneously of management and of Board. It is only when we have stabilized the situation and dramatically grew in scope and portfolio, not to mention national and international recognition, that the Board decided to exploit their formal status by manipulating the vagaries, unclear roles and responsibilities - actually outright lack of Board accountability structure - of the Constitution.

3) Why are they trying to remove you (executive director)? What grounds do they give for this?
Absolutely no grounds. As to motivation, who knows? As who can understand irrationality and envy?

4) What do the donors think of this all?
The donors are rightly as baffled and frustrated as we all are. They are very supportive of CSD and our activities. One or two may be not be used to having a Cambodian woman speak and interact with them as their equals, so again baffling in another regard.

5) Why have things escalated (for example, their bringing military police with them to CSD and releasing media statements) to this extent?
The acts of these 3 individuals (2 former Board, one former executive director) have been ones of obstruction, destruction and immaturity; they reflect a sad and desperate attempt at power, so desperate that they believe they could use illegal MoI force with impunity; very destructive and immature in their use of publicity, to use the threat of destroying CSD as a bargaining chip. How they have acted and their mentality is not very different from the larger mentality of relying on brute power and connections to get one's way.

6) When was the new board elected and who was involved in this process?
For over one year, we were without a functioning Board. The issue of Board membership had been on the table for discussion for many months, with the process of nomination opened to the former existing Board members, the Management Committee and donors. Hence, the new Board members came about after opening the floor for nomination to all these individuals and stakeholders and opening the floor for voting to the former Board members and Management Committee members.

7) How can CSD move forward and resolve this crisis?
CSD is moving forward; this is a non-issue.

8) Do you think this internal dispute will harm the important work CSD does in Cambodia?
No, to the contrary. It has made my staff so much stronger in their ownership and solidarity. It has chipped away at all our unhealthy naivete and unconditional trust of foreigners and people with seniority of age and status. The best way to learn a valuable lesson is in the caldron of experience. We are learning our lessons well, the main one being that every challenge is really only an opportunity in disguise. Additionally, it has created sympathy and empathy from the public who believe in us and trust our voice and work.

9) Where does the Chief Financial Officer stand on this? Do you have the full support of all your staff?
The Finance Manager is superb ! My staff are superb ! I am so proud of each of them. I am truly honored to be working with each of them. Many of them are more than staff but friends and "family".

It should also be noted, we have an international auditing firm who has praised us for our notable improvements from years before.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Pi=3,1415926535897932384626433832795
Sphère=?
Fuseau=?
Cambodia belong to khmers ,not to UN,Sihanouk,Ho,Mao.
You the new generation,you are the owner of Cambodia.2000 000 killed,it's gigantic.

Anonymous said...

38 millions were killed in China, 26 millions were killed in Russia,
4-5 millions were killed in Vietnam, and he list goes on and on during the revolution war.

Yes everyone knows that the country belongs to the native people, but what is your point?

Every war, there is always lives involved with it in every nation, and since when did you just learn?

Just 2M died, but without King Sihanouk, it could be almost the whole country 5-6 M dead by US and Vietnam war backed by Soviet and China.

Now let me say to you "Shut da Fuck ah mee Youn spy, and stop stirring problems among Khmers to fight Khmers again, you son.daughter of whore parasite."

Anonymous said...

My comments to ah.mee 4:41PM

38 millions were killed in China, 26 millions were killed in Russia,
4-5 millions were killed in Vietnam, and he list goes on and on during the revolution war.

Yes everyone knows that the country belongs to the native people, but what is your point?

Every war, there is always lives involved with it in every nation, and since when did you just learn?

Just 2M died, but without King Sihanouk, it could be almost the whole country 5-6 M dead by US and Vietnam war backed by Soviet and China.

Now let me say to you "Shut da Fuck ah mee Youn spy, and stop stirring problems among Khmers to fight Khmers again, you son.daughter of whore parasite."

Anonymous said...

Getting financially support from outsiders and why did these two anti_Theary brought the CPP police to deliver a letter to terminate her? Yes on what ground?

I tell you that the monkeys Peung Yok Hiep and Mr. Vi Houi
in Cambodia don't know what to start or to end.

Anonymous said...

Look at big picture:
-Staff becomes unruly because of unclear role from incompetent Board and initial staff,
-Current Executive Director is too quick to embrace influence of others not those of CSD Board
-Staff attitude is to bite feeding hands whether small or big, that's unCambodian,
-Theary head is swollen because she has no expereince in dealing with real grass root organization,
-Habit of running her mouth with press will soon got her where she started...
Dictatorship has become Theary trend...dangerously indeed

Anonymous said...

Time for the French whore to step down and let someone else do the job. Enough money has been wasted on her.

Anonymous said...

She should join the HRP.

Anonymous said...

2;10am. Miss Theary is Carla Bruni Sarkozy? Great then. She should stay and control the dumb Khmers.
Yea step down one step then she can go back up 2 steps.

Anonymous said...

Rite. French whore is Carla Bruni Sarkozy. French whore is a first Lady of France.
The Asian whore is for just a glass of coke. kekekeke...

Wow Theary is like Carla Bruni Sarkozy. Umm delicious uh ah. yeahhhh....oh yeahh..

Anonymous said...

How can you all compare Theary Seng to somebody who has higher qualities than her?

1) Carla is very well educated yound woman with genuine qualities.

2) She has to need to be withn Sarkozy to be famous. She is already famous by herself.

3) She doesn't bullshit people like Theary does.

4) She doesn't need to be an opportunist who seeks fame like Theary

5) She doesn't need to pretend to be someone else.

6) She doesn't to be a scheme to mislead people like Theary and her brothers

7) She is as much corrupted as the CPP because without CPP she just can't have a luxurious living like that especcially in Cambodia.

Other than fighting and searching for her fame, she doesn't do much to save or to heal Cambodians as she always has claimed.

Last but not least, she CAN'T be compared to the real SAINTS who worked extremely hard and died without any recognition.

How can you call her a "saint" when she submerges in luxury, while others (especially the poor and underpriveldge ones) are struggling to survive every minutes of their life?