Saturday, October 09, 2010

Onus on Japan to lead world into next stage of capitalism

October 09, 2010
By Yoko Kato, professor of Japanese history at the University of Tokyo
The Mainichi Daily News (Japan)

Every time I watch the news or read the paper, I'm struck by the falling number of reports we receive from correspondents based abroad. Born in 1960, I still remember the unfamiliar ring of names like "the Ho Chi Minh trail" and "Parrot's Beak" coming from the television set next to our kitchen table in the mornings. Time has passed since the Vietnam War spilled over into Cambodia in 1970.

Today, the worldwide financial crisis is probably the most frequently reported-on topic. That in itself is fine. What's unbearable is the fact that these "reports" are merely questions asking whether we're going to experience a double-dip recession or whether there will be an end to the rising yen. It feels like the captain of our plane has just announced the inevitability of a crash landing due to technical problems, and we're waiting in the brace position for the moment of impact.

These questions are not what we are seeking. The questions that should be asked are how the major economic changes taking place today will change us and continue to change us in the future.


There's nothing historians can do if asked to predict the future of the global economy. However, what the American Pulitzer-winning historian John Dower said when asked about what it means to be a historian -- seeking "patterns in complexity" -- provides food for thought. It is when figuring out how a global economic shift will change our society becomes the issue that the historian's modus operandi of finding patterns is infused with meaning.

Former chief economist for Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Kazuo Mizuno -- who in early September became the Cabinet Office's deputy director-general for economic and fiscal analysis -- discusses the ongoing upheaval using this very method. He has adjusted statistics derived from countless studies for timeless comparability, and created a graph in which the vertical axis comprises the world's real GDP per capita, and the horizontal axis the long history of humankind. Illustrating the changes that have taken place in the past 1 million years in one graph could not have been an easy task.

From the data, Mizuno has managed to tease out a thrilling argument. The modern period began in the 1600s, with the age of exploration in full-swing. The principle on which society was based during this period was capitalism, a system in which a handful of people in the first world comprising less than 20 percent of the global population bought cheap resources from people in the third world constituting 80 percent of the global population, in turn selling products at high prices.

The system worked well for 400 years, which was why developed countries flourished until the 1970s. However, Mizuno argues, as the emerging self-assertiveness of oil-rich countries, falling profit rates among major corporations, and stalling crude steel production accurately suggested, capitalism entered a stage of stagnation after peaking in 1974.

Leading the world in this modernization race were the U.S. and Japan. When real investment hit a wall, they had nowhere to turn but bubbles. First, Japan dove straight into a real estate bubble in the 1980s, with the U.S. following suit in the 1990s in the realm of finance. The bursting of both bubbles brings our economic history to the present day.

As a result of the globalization of the world economy, the system based on 20 percent of the world exploiting the remaining 80 percent is proving no longer viable. Mizuno says in his book, "Hitobito wa naze gurobaru keizai no honshitsu o miayamaru noka" (Why do people misread the global economy?), that if this major upheaval represents what economic history can teach us about the future, Japan -- which has heretofore been at the head of the pack -- should be the very nation to move onto the next stage first.

If this is true, what is the future that awaits us? To answer this question, it is worthwhile to look at how during the oil crisis of the 1970s, Japan became the first to overcome the crisis through energy-efficient technology. Next, factor in the reality that a scramble for rare resources, including fossil fuels, has already begun. With that in mind, try to envision a future in which 3 billion consumers from emerging countries demand technologies, products, and systems appropriate for a society no longer dependent on fossil fuels. In order to be able to sell any such products and systems overseas, Japan must pull off its own full-fledged disengagement from fossil fuels ahead of anyone else.

What I find so intriguing about Mizuno's argument is his presupposition of Japan's position as a global forerunner. At one time, it was common for us to explain Japan's capitalism using words like "unconventional" and "exceptional." As a result, exposure to Mizuno's unique theory which places Japan's real estate bubble on the same level with the U.S. financial bubble evokes an oddly profound emotion.

Japan as a nation is worthy of in-depth analysis in that it has served as a "preview" of what is to come in the rest of the world. What the U.S. has directed toward Afghanistan and Iraq after Sept. 11, 2001, is more a gaze aimed at the subject of punitive action than at countries with which one is at war. The way the U.S. sees Afghanistan and Iraq is similar to the way in which Japan saw China during the Sino-Japanese War. It is precisely because Japan has set so many precedents for the world that it bears the responsibility of paving the way to a new stage of capitalism. No, this is not an attempt at satire. This is hope.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well....As long as United States and Japan continue to pump out new technologies and new discoveries in science and medicine and they will be the so called global forerunner.

Now look at dirt poor corrupted Cambodia whose leaders depend on solely selling the country natural resources and dirt cheap labor ...there is no innovation in science and technology....and it is predictable that Cambodia will the same dirt poor country for many generation to come!

It is more profitable to use the mind to create products for 80% of the world population than to sell the land and few resources!

Anonymous said...

There are almost seven billion people in the world who need foods to eat,and things to use .The economy is the main one that each country,specially the richest countries need more technical economies and nuclear energy or power to control the poor small countries as Khmer.The nuclear bombs are the main ones for these powerful countries to threaten to weak one.