Khmerization please post my comment on KI.
A win-win policy is global success strategy, may be the only most successful strategy that has existed in the universe.
The ruling Cambodian People's Party (CPP) or the opposition Sam Rainsy Party (SRP) must set an acceptable strategy for the majority of the people to follow. In order to gain supports, the SRP has to set a clear role model or imagination to form the vivid picture for people to see that will lead them to believe in the party and eventually support its causes. The SRP must show leadership model, which means to bring a higher or greater standard than ordinary people are willing to accept. It must lead to a change, but if things do not need a change then we don't need a new leader. We may just want a manager only, that would be enough. The SRP is trying to gain supports by using a model of criticising the individual Hun Sen only. All SRP members, hundreds and thousands of them, have wasted their energy and times by focusing on and directing negative campaigns against the CPP and then spread it out.
Ok, here are the outcomes: all forms of criticism, jealousies, angers and hatred are the forms of the ghosts of all destruction any man or woman possessed. These forms are self-destructive. People will not be willing to join, listen and support the SRP which have mastered the art of criticism of individuals and the whole Party.
May I reach out to HE. Sam Rainsy. Please reform or alter your policy platform to set more constructive role model, lift it up or bring a better level for all SRP supporters. Let them see in the future that if you win, all those people who support you will benefit from your rule....etc ,. I want to see all SRP members be smarter, wishful and become better than 5 years ago.
The CPP has built a future for Cambodia. It has built more than 20,000 schools, thousand kilometers of roads, hospitals and built a fundamental capitalist society that lead to civilization, stronger economy and a better living standard now. That is the vivid picture the people of today bear in mind.
Please Khmerization help edit my article, Thank you.
The views expressed above are not representative of Khmerization's view. The article was published at the request of the writer.
The ruling Cambodian People's Party (CPP) or the opposition Sam Rainsy Party (SRP) must set an acceptable strategy for the majority of the people to follow. In order to gain supports, the SRP has to set a clear role model or imagination to form the vivid picture for people to see that will lead them to believe in the party and eventually support its causes. The SRP must show leadership model, which means to bring a higher or greater standard than ordinary people are willing to accept. It must lead to a change, but if things do not need a change then we don't need a new leader. We may just want a manager only, that would be enough. The SRP is trying to gain supports by using a model of criticising the individual Hun Sen only. All SRP members, hundreds and thousands of them, have wasted their energy and times by focusing on and directing negative campaigns against the CPP and then spread it out.
Ok, here are the outcomes: all forms of criticism, jealousies, angers and hatred are the forms of the ghosts of all destruction any man or woman possessed. These forms are self-destructive. People will not be willing to join, listen and support the SRP which have mastered the art of criticism of individuals and the whole Party.
May I reach out to HE. Sam Rainsy. Please reform or alter your policy platform to set more constructive role model, lift it up or bring a better level for all SRP supporters. Let them see in the future that if you win, all those people who support you will benefit from your rule....etc ,. I want to see all SRP members be smarter, wishful and become better than 5 years ago.
The CPP has built a future for Cambodia. It has built more than 20,000 schools, thousand kilometers of roads, hospitals and built a fundamental capitalist society that lead to civilization, stronger economy and a better living standard now. That is the vivid picture the people of today bear in mind.
Please Khmerization help edit my article, Thank you.
The views expressed above are not representative of Khmerization's view. The article was published at the request of the writer.
25 comments:
many thank Khmerization for posting and perfectly edite the article, I want to know you personaly one day, Thank one again
Dear writer thanks for a great article.
Despire a great positive of CPP you mentionned have you ever think about what are the negative impacts made also by CPP. Look at the cambodia nowaday on the following views:
1 What is the eduction! Cambodia having the highest ratio of doctorate to it's population. It's read ashame. What is the shit doctorate degree of Chamreun university, do you feel ashane?
2 Have a look at the ratio of excellency among their state employees, what is that? have you ever been ashame of that?
that only a very small piece, please open your eyes and look more
First where the sources of money they came from? After they built them who will be owned the Cambodia?
Viet?
keep your stupid win win at home idiot ,you are must be the Viet mouth piece
Your article say that CPP has built a future for Cambodia is only your own opion. But all CPP Leader such as Hun Xen, Heng Somrin, Chea Sim, Hor 5 Hong & Sva Kim Hong are selling Khmer to Youn. They are preparing to run away from Cambodia to where they want.
who give the land to youn??
in history not Hun Sen, but Frence and ancien King gave to VN ?
a lot of opposition man live in Frence so equal give land to youn
It seem you are the intellectual. Yes, Cambodia is rich of intellectual like you that is why Cambodia is smaller, more beggars, more human traffickers, more murderers, more scavengers, prostitutes,......... and so on.
Since you have more better strategy to win over Hun Sen, I wish you form an opposition party I will join you.
YOU TRIED TO TELL US THAT CPP HAS
BUILT 20,000 SCHOOLS.HOW MANY OF THEM DID NOT BEAR HUN SEN OR BUN RANY HUN SEN? THE QUESTIONS ARE WHERE THEY GET THE MONEY FROM AND ALSO WHAT THEY TEACH IN THOSE SCHOOLS???
YOU ALSO SAID THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS ESTABLISHED A CAPITALIST SOCIETY IN CAMBODIA.NOTHING CAN BE
FAR FROM THE TRUTH BUT LET'S BE HONEST, CAN YOU TELL US WHO ELSE HOLDS THE CAPITALS APART FROM HUN SEN, BUN RANY AND FAMILY AND ASSOCIATES???
YOU ALSO SAID THAT CPP HAS BUILT A FUTURE FOR CAMBODIA. WOW WHAT A FUTURE, A SIX BILLION PLUS DOLLAR
DEBT. CAN YOU TELL US WHO ARE GOING
TO PAY IT BACK AND HOW. YOUR COMMENT WOULD BE VERY APPRECIOATED.
THE CAPITALS
9:45
America owed 13.8 trllion in foreign debt. Thailan owed 663 billion debt, Spain 665.3 billion debt, and who will pay that debt?
i think you are not good than Hun XEn, but bad than hun sen, because you nerver help country, only insult our Country...
With 20,000 schools, Cambodia's literacy rate is way below Cuba, which is up at 97 percent.
Only 64% of female are literate. While that look like a nice number, consider this: 56 percent are illiterate! That is a huge percentage of potential wasted.
real GDP growth rate is -(negative) 2%.
and 31% live under the poverty line.
Anonymous, the number of school is not the same thing as the quality of school. Please don't confused the two. Do not forget to give credit also to private enterprises and NGOs that are responsible for setting up some of the best schools the government can't even match.
So far as concerning school, the thing that we know Hun Sen's government are good at is prop up a building, write Hun Sen's name on the sign and then leave it to crumble! There is really no nationwide systematic program for analyzing quality of education. Cheating is a huge problem in Cambodia - supported of course by our very own Hun Sen and cronies, to be at the top, "the end justifies the end", even though the meaning ends up short-changing yourself and destroying your own community based on fragile foundation.
So far, a lot the comments I read, seem to be unable to separate Sam Rainsy and KI Media, and "opposition" and general dissent.
Anything or anybody whose opinion are that "Hun Sen is doing a horrible job developming a sustainable future" gets lumped into "Sam Rainsy Supporters".
Frankly, I am tired of getting mindlessly labeled by such people.
Hun Sen should understand that those who do not follow him do not mean Sam Rainsy, and that Sam Rainsy likewise, do not represents our individual Cambodian voices also and that while KI opposes Hun Sen's stupid policies, they don not speak for Sam Rainsy nor do Sam Rainsy speaks for KI and it's readers!
អាចុយម៉្រាយសមរង្សីនឹងបក្សពួកបើអាចុយម៉្រាយ
ឯងក្បត់ជាតហើយកុំនាំពលរដ្ធខ្មែរជាប់គុកតាម
អាចុយម៉្រាយឯងអីអញចង់តែទៅកាប់អាចុយម៉្រាយ
ឯងឲ្យដល់ស្រុកបារាំងទេ។
crazy khmer crazy khmer crazy khmer crazy khmer crazy khmer
why don't love-live and devellop your poor Country togather
h a ha ha haaa sooo shy shy
พี่ชายน้องสาวกัมพูชาของฉัน, ควายตาบอด Sen เขาคนนี้ไม่ได้ผู้ช่วยเหลือของคุณ แต่เขาเป็นผู้ทำลายกัมพูชาและกบฏชาติ.
khmersott
OK Mr. "win, win" policy.
I am supprise that you mention Mr. Sen building more than 20,000 schools.
1. Where does those money come from? The threat to those Oukna? Mr. Monk Rithy seems very kinds inditual...every time Mr. Sen looked at him ....he gave Mr. Sen two schools worth almost $30,000. But what has Mr. Sen had to give back to Mr. Rithy? All the signitures, joint ventures with Malaysia...how many hundreds of thousand hectars that Mr. Sen gave to Mr. Rithy? And this is only one example of Mr. "win/win" policy!! How about hundreds more Oukna.....? Yo! Mr. "win/win" policy of "fundamental capitalist society that lead to civilization"? I agreed with you on this point, but you are talking about the capitalist society for the top 1-2% of the Khmer poputation!!!(dictatorship policy) Mr. win/win policy - your Mr. Sen govt. do not have a triggle down wealth policy to the poor (it a drope/not even a drip policy...enough for them to stay a live to vote and to ligitimize Mr. Sen regime).
2. Mr. Win/win policy...over 200,000 school building? Like I said before building do not teach children. Teachers teach children!!!! Thus, I am surprise that you're not mention about how many qualify teachers to teach the children in those over 200,000 school building! BTW - how much those teachers get pay Mr. win/win policy?
Those school buildings are window dressing policy of Mr. Sen regime build them just to win the vote!
****Mr. win/win policy...just for your informaiton: School buildings do not teach children, teachers teach children****
I realy try to stope the culture of complian nothing else, please give me excuse if it insult you in some way.
some OF SRP ARE MASTER IN COMPLIAN ITS OK, BUT IF HUNDRED OF THOUSANDS OF THEM GOOD IN MANAGING CRITICISM, CAN WE IMAGINE......... and what was the outcome of such comlaining?Best regards
11:48 am,
What is your question? Can you say again of what you want to know from our bloggers?
10:05 am,
This is 11:19 AM,
I didn't get to read your blog before I wrote mind.
Thank you for your well point out on statistic pertaining to Khmer people living condition right now.
Furthermore I appreciate that whoever critize govt. is lume altogether with the opposition party...this is very dangerouse...just like KR policy..."if you not with me, you against me!"...kill them all!..
I am not member of any parties, I am just one Koun Khmer among many Koun Khmers that worry and concern about Khmer's nation and her people's future. I live in America for 30 yrs, but my father told me to never forget of where I come from. All I want is the best and a good chance for all Khmer people. I want them all to experience the political freedom,and democracy that I come and live to enjoy and appreciate. And I want all Koun Khmers to have experience of freedom as I do!
Without further due..Once again, thanks, I am happy that we are on the same page 10:05am.
អេហេ....10:39 អានេះបែបទើបតែស៊ីអាចម៏អាហ៊ុនសែនទេដឹងបានជាប្រកាច់ចាប់មិនឈ្នះយ៉ាងនេះ។គិតទៅហ៊ុនសែនឯងដូចជាចង្រៃពេកហើយសូម្បីតែអាចម៏របស់របស់ឯងពេកដែលឆ្កែមួយក្បាលនេះស៊ីក៏វាតែវ៉ែលែងស្គាល់ខុសស្គាល់ត្រូវដែរ។
អេហេ....10:39 អានេះបែបទើបតែស៊ីអាចម៏អាហ៊ុនសែនទេដឹងបានជាប្រកាច់ចាប់មិនឈ្នះយ៉ាងនេះ។គិតទៅហ៊ុនសែនឯងដូចជាចង្រៃពេកហើយសូម្បីតែអាចម៏របស់របស់ឯងពេលដែលឆ្កែមួយក្បាលនេះស៊ីក៏វាតែវ៉ែលែងស្គាល់ខុសស្គាល់ត្រូវដែរ។
A Rebuttal to the Win-Win-Policy
First of all I would like to thank the author of the article for putting forth constructive criticism.
I couldn’t agree more that all major political parties should have acceptable strategy for the majority of the people. I couldn’t help but wonder what is acceptable? Whose standard is it? Who defines the standard?
If the author simply means that each party should have a clearly defined vision and stay away from attacking each other, I would say, “Bravo to that.”
In closing, the author slipped this statement, “The CPP has built a future for Cambodia. It has built more than 20,000 schools, thousand kilometers of roads, hospitals and built a fundamental capitalist society that lead to civilization, stronger economy and a better living standard now. That is the vivid picture the people of today bear in mind.”
Without rigorous analysis, the statement appears to have merit. But if one takes a minute to look beyond the obvious, one would agree that the statement does not mean anything by itself.
Let’s pretend for a moment that you are a brand new employee. When you walk in the office, your employer gives you list of job requirements. You suppose, for example, to complete tasks A, B, C, D, and E by the end of the month. Let’s pretend further that, by the end of the month, you complete tasks A, B, C, D, and E.
At the end of the first month, you and your employer go through a performance evaluation. In the end, the employer wrote on the performance evaluation that, “You have met the job requirement.”
You would agree that the employer is fair. You simply meet the requirements; you did not go above and beyond your required tasks.
Similarly, we can say the same thing about the above statement. We, the people, hire CPP to form a government. The government’s tasks are to build the nation’s infrastructures. Although, we should give the government the credit for building the nation’s infrastructures when we don’t even know if it meets the requirements.
I am not here to refute the number of schools the government has built. I am simply here to refute in principle that such statement in and of itself does not mean much. One cannot decipher whether the government has done a good job or not because we, as the Cambodian people, never set the expectations. The statement may be good for political propaganda but it has no merit for analysis.
We should also take a moment to distinguish the term we use. Cambodian People’s Party is a political party and the government is much more that a party. The author states that CPP has built… Does the author mean the government has built? If the government in fact has built those schools, the credit must be shared with all the parties that made up the government.
A good citizen should pay careful attention the terms or words that are being used in political discussion because words are fundamental building blocks that form our world view. If we allow words to obscure its meaning, our world view will also be obscured.
Nevertheless, I want to thank the author for having the courage to put forth constructive criticism which is badly needed.
By the way, I am not a member of SRP nor am I a member of any Khmer political party.
To 10:39AM
Don't change the subject! Ah Pleur!
Just stick to the subject and the subject is the Vietcong dog eaters are taking over Cambodian farmland and orchard and what AH HUN SEN is going to do about it? Now it is time for AH HUN SEN show how much he care for these poor Cambodian farmers who become homeless and have no land to grow food to feed their family? If AH HUN SEN can support 5 million illegal Viet in Cambodia and I am sure that AH HUN SEN can do more to help those poor Cambodian farmers!
Go AH HUN SEN! Go! Go AH HUN SEN! Go! Poor Cambodian farmers need you!
Ah chhkuot teang lay, ah hun xen ning pak puok dael chea kanh cheas vea ban tveu sala rean dak chhmuos vea dael vea khom luoch luy cheat mok tveu uot khluon tha chea neak chenh luy. ah chhkae ning ban luy pi na mok???? prak khae vea mean pon man khnong 1 khae????? rik cham roen ah khmaoch ey, monus ot bay, rohem roham, doe som tean, doe reus et chay, doe reus samram si, slab daoy lan bok, slab daoy luoch banh, slab daoy chak thnam, slab daoy choab kuk, toe teang os nis chea sna day ah chhkae na???? min keu ah chhkae hun xen ning pak puok vea te reu. pul roat yul ning deung teang os khnea hoey, tae min toan rok vithy banh kbal ahaeng reu ko chab kbal ahaeng roal mok pyuor reu ko kat chenh pi kbal thngay na muoy min khan.
Government should create another website against Sam Rainsy and let readers who support CPP to criticise Sam Rainsy.
Hun Sen Thok
imagination is good for the mind, it's a start of a great idea, etc!
Post a Comment