THE CAMBODIAN GOVERNMENT MUST EARN THE RESPECT
OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY
On February 23, 2011, the Supreme Court in Phnom Penh will decide on my case related to a border incident in 2010.
I would like to remind the Cambodian government of the opinion on this political case expressed by two important bodies representing the international community.
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
In its "Resolution on Cambodia, in particular the case of Sam Rainsy" unanimously adopted in Strasbourg on October 21, 2010, the European Parliament condemns “all politically motivated sentences against representatives of the opposition and NGOs.” It says, "the strategy of Cambodia's ruling party is to use a politically subservient judiciary to crackdown on all government critics,” and it considers my gesture in Svay Rieng province “to be of a symbolic and clearly political nature” and my conviction as “based on an act of civil disobedience.” The European Parliament also notes, “the uprooting of six wooden temporary border posts at the Vietnamese-Cambodian border, which is still disputed between the two countries [...] took place in support of villagers who claimed to be victims of land-grabbing, saying that the Vietnamese had illegally shifted the posts onto Cambodian soil, in their rice fields, and that their complaints to the local authorities had remained unanswered.” [Read the whole text of the European Parliament Resolution at http://tinyurl.com/34cq5pe].
INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION
On January 17, 2011, the Inter-Parliamentary Union in Geneva adopted the following Decision:
« - Recalling that Mr. Sam Rainsy, in judgments handed down in January and September 2010, was sentenced to a total of 12 years' imprisonment and a heavy fine for (a) having pulled out border post #185 marking the Cambodian/Vietnamese border in a village in Svay Rieng province (...), and (b) divulging false information [regarding a geographical map],
- Noting that no one disputes the fact that the process of demarcating the border between Vietnam and Cambodia is under way, that border marker #185 was a temporary wooden post and that the government recognized it was not a real and legal border marker and officially decided to dismantle it, and that there is at present no map recognized by Vietnam and Cambodia as being official and binding,
- Considering in this respect that Prime Minister Hun Sen stated the following in response to a letter by which the Speaker of the National Assembly had forwarded to him questions raised by members of parliament belonging to the Sam Rainsy Party regarding the border demarcation process: "In the area surrounding the tentative post #185, in particular posts #184 to 187 along the border between Cambodia and Vietnam, the joint technical group from the two countries is continuing its study on the actual ground in order to search for material evidence necessary for the determination of the real location of those border posts. Because the joint technical group from the two countries has not planted border post #185 yet, the border demarcation work, which is the work of the joint technical group after the planting of that post, has not started yet either." [Read Hun Sen's November 8, 2010 letter at http://tinyurl.com/25ulw7c]
[The Inter-Parliamentary Union]
1- Reaffirms that Mr. Sam Rainsy's gesture of pulling out temporary border markers was clearly a political gesture, and that, consequently, the courts should never have been resorted to for resolving a political question;
2- Notes that, given the official recognition that there was no such thing as a legal border post #185, Mr. Sam Rainsy cannot possibly have committed a crime by pulling out wooden posts, which were illegally planted;
3- Considers, therefore, that it has become urgent to review Mr. Sam Rainsy's case and to rehabilitate him and calls on the authorities, including Parliament, to take action to this end without delay so as to enable Mr. Sam Rainsy to resume his rightful place as a member of the National Assembly. » [Read the whole text of the IPU Decision at http://tinyurl.com/6yrt4t4].
The Cambodian government must show a minimum of consistency and openness in order to earn the respect of the international community at a time when Cambodia badly needs the support of this very international community in the defense of its territorial integrity against a foreign aggression.
Sam Rainsy
Member of Parliament
19 comments:
Why do Kos Trol, sea and lands proximately over 10 000 km2 have been lost to Vietnam by who treaty? Why don’t Cambodia goverment transparencies explain to Cambodia army at front line and the whole nation about this? Why don't they include this into education system? Why?
Cambodian armies are fighting at front line for 4.6 km2 and what's about over 10 000km2 of Cambodia to Vietnam. Nobody dare to talk about it! Why? Cambodian armies you are decide the fate of your nation, Cambodian army as well as Cambodian people must rethink about this again and again. Is it fair?
Kos Trol, Sea and lands over 10 000km2 have been lost to Vietnam by who treaty at 1979 to 1985 treaty! Treaty! Cambodian army at front line as well as all Cambodian people must rethink again about these issues. Are Cambodian army fighting to protect the Cambodia Nation or protect a very small group that own big lands, big properties or only protecting a small group rather in the real name of protecting Khmer nation?
Cambodian army at front line suffer under rain, wind, bullets, bombs, lack of foods, lack of nutrition, their families have no health care help, no securities after they die but a very small group eat well, sleep well, sleep in first class hotel with air conditioning with young girls message, have super health care from oversea medical treatment, they are billionaires, millionaires who sell out the country to be rich and make Cambodian people suffer everyday as Cambodian people know already.
Who signed the treaty 1979-1985 that result lost over 10 000 km2 of Cambodia??? Why don't they transparency inform all Cambodian and Cambodian army at front line about these issues? Why don't include Kos Trol (Kos Trol size is bigger than the whole Phom Phen and bigger than Singapoor with heap of great natural resources) in education system in Cambodia.
Look at Hun Sen families, relatives; friends are billionaires, millionaires where do they get the money from if we all just get out of war with empty hands? Hun Sen always say in his speech Cambodia just get up from war, just get up from Zero with empty hands and how come they are billionaires, millionaires but 90% innocent Cambodian people are so poor struggling with living every day.
Smart Khmer girl Ms. Rattana Keo,
From my point of view, Mr.Sam Rainsy should be quiet at this moment then wait and see. The court have known every ting about you. You just sent a nice letter to Priminister HUN SEN to express your support against Thai invasion.
Now you put thing in different way. I don't think you are a smart political leader.
*This is his RIGHT to remind the Khmer robot court.if People have Human Brain,they don't do to him like that.The communist system can not Help Cambodia country from v-nam influence.
*The Bad Point of Hun sen Govt are:
*Lied Themselve about Viet-nam are Friends since year 1979.The TRUTH is Viet-nam are BOSS.
*Hun sen Govt Trust v-nam Hanoi 100%...But Hanoi Trust Hun sen Govt 50% only.
* A lot Hun sen Govt High officials are not pure KHMER BLOOD 100%.They're viet-nam Blood.
-Hor Nam hong,Khmauch Hok Lundy,sok kong for example.
*Right now everything are Right for Hun sen and his teams,but later or next several years more Everything are Wrong like King Sihanouk in year 1970 for example.
KHMER DAI
*ALL CPP, Please Dont Lied yourself,since year 1979-89,all you guys with viet-nam Advisers look like CATS and Mouses or Tigers with Dogs. you can not talk loudly with viet-nam.you riding Soviet cars look like Monkeys or Dogs in that cars.Right now you have Lexus,Land cruiser,Stars,Dollars etc....Why?.if no Paris agreement [1993]and no UNTAC,May bee all you guys the same Monkeys now.
FREE CONDOMS
Ratthana Keo,
I understand your national sentiment.
But you should not post your repeated comment every day.
Regarding to Koh Tral, you should ask King Norodom Shihanouk who was a party in signing a legal instrument not claim back Koh Tral from Vietnam in 1960s. Maybe you don't know. But it is true.
During that period, he should file document and sue to ICJ like Preah Vihear case, but he did not.
This king destroyed Khmer interests secretly and silently, but he is considered a khmer hero.
He was the only one brought fire from Vietnam war to burn srok khmer!
If no that case, no Lon Nol, No Pol Pot, No 7 January, and no...like nowadays.
I feel so sorry and very regret what we lost.
8:57 AM
I strongly support your idea.
This is a way of Sam Rangsy. He is a politician, but he does not understand well about politics.
He does not know about himself and his enemy and when should he act...and when he should not...
suck my dick, dog Sam
Mr. Sam Rainsy, "if I were you" I stand firmed and strongly with the political policies of Sam Rainsy. You knew ah..HS kbot jeat and vea jea dog's Youn Hanoi already and your party run campaign against their party. Why you Still want to put your head into crocodile's mouth. You are a opposition party leader so you have to look deeper into the conflict of Khmer and Thai. Do these two countries wanted the flame or this idea came from a third person which is Vie.., you are a leader, you should think about its.OK
No, he shouldnot be silient. He need to be more proactive. it is his roight to speak up on any issue. If he shuts up, yiu guys would say he is quiet, when he opens up, you would say he talks too much.
He is a leader of a country too.
you guys better go and live in srok yuon, tunisia, Barhain, or stay where you are undwer Hun Sen and enjoy it. Don't ever dream of coming to live in freedom in USA, but if you are already there by cheating your way in, please learn to use your brain.
ស្គាល់ខ្លួនឯង ស្គាល់សត្រូវ ធ្វើសង្គ្រាម១០០ដង ឈ្នះ១០០ដង។
ការធ្វើសង្គ្រាម ឬ ការប្រកួតប្រជែងអ្វីមួយ បើចេះតែធ្វើដោយងងឹតងងល់ ដោយមិនស្គាល់ភាពខុសគ្នារវាងខ្លួននិងសត្រូវ ហើយមិនដឹងថា តើពេលណាត្រូវធ្វើសកម្មភាព ពេលណាមិនត្រូវធ្វើ ដូចជា បើសំពៅកំពុងជួបខ្យល់ព្យុះ តើគេបើកក្តោងឬទេ? ។
បើមិនដឹងដូច្នេះទេ បុគ្គលប្រភេទនេះ គឺជាមនុស្សល្ងង់ដ៏ពិតណាស់។
បើវាជាមនុស្សល្ងង់ហើយ មិនគួរយកវាធ្វើជាមិត្តទេ ដូចជាគេនិយាយថា សូវមានសត្រូវឆ្លាតវាងវៃជាងខ្លួន ប្រសើរជាងមានមិត្តល្ងង់ខ្លៅ!
10:37 am
Thank you for your idea. I am 8:57am. To be a leader, such person must know himself that he is a commender in chief, too. Don't shoot the ennemy when you see them. Wait and get all information
then make the right decision.
Most of the time, the ennemy sent 3 or 5 soldiers first, or sent a group of soldiers to fight you from West. But the main objective of the ennemy is to fight you from the North or South or East.
Think about that Rainsy.
BP
BP,
Why don't you write to Mr. Sam directly using the email of his party and advise him on how to make the next move rather than discuss the issue here?
You never know your idea may be so good that in the end he wants to hire you indirectly as his personal political adviser.
12:27PM
Thanks,
I met Sam Rainsy and his wife. I also met Mr. Kong Kam.
It is not seary to correct or advise Rainsy. He won't listen to any body. I admire him for his policy. But the way he has implimented his policy, he lack of technical approach and strategy.
I am neither CPP nor any political party.
Thanks,
BP
លោកសមរង្ស៊ី នៅកម្ពុជា គឺគ្មាននរណា គេចង់អោយលោកសមរង្ស៊ីជាប់គុកទេ តែរឿង
រ៉ាវដែលបានកើតឡើងកន្លងមកនេះ គឺខ្លួនលោកទេ ដែលជាអ្នកប្រព្រឹត្តដោយខ្លួនឯង ។ នគរគឺមានច្បាប់ រឿងអីៗក៏ដោយ គឺត្រូវដោះស្រាយតាមសន្តិវិធី តែលោកសមរង្ស៊ីឯងបាន ទៅដកបង្គោលតម្រុយព្រំដែន ជាពិសេសក្នុង
ករណីមកបញ្ចុះបញ្ចើង ឌឺដង ។ តាមពិតទៅ
ក្នុងរឿងនោះ ហេតុដូចម្ដេច បានជាលោកសមរង្ស៊ីឯង មិនប្ដឹងមករដ្ឋសភា បើបានប្ដឹងហើយ ហើយសភា នៅតែធ្វើគធ្វើថ្លង់ទៀតនោះ គឺវាជារឿងមួយផ្សេងទៀត តែយ៉ាងហោច
ណាស់លោកក៏បានធ្វើរឿងមួយ ក្នុងបុព្វហេតុ
ការពារបូរណភាពទឹកដីតាមសន្តិវិធីមួយផ្នែកដែរ ការធ្វើយ៉ាងនេះ គឺវាប្រសើជាជាង ដោយមិនបាច់រត់ចោលស្រុកដូចបច្ចុប្បន្ននេះឡើយ
I agree with 8:57 AM.
លោក សម រង្សីគួរតែរៀនអត់ធ្មត់បន្តិចទៅ ការ
ធ្វើនយោបាយគឺមិនមែនការបញ្ចេញមតិតាម
ទំព័រកាសែតមុនការអនុវត្តន៍ច្បាប់ទេ។
ខ្មែរភាគច្រើនមានគំនិតស្របនឹងការចូលរួម
សាមគ្គីប្រឆាំងការឈ្លានពានរបស់សៀម ដូច្នេះលោកត្រូវចាប់យកឱកាសនេះអោយជាប់
ដោយកុំអោយគេថាលោកធ្វើដើម្បីតថ្លៃនឹង
តុលាការដែលកំពុងកាត់ទោសលោក តែគឺ
លោកត្រូវចែករឿងពីរនេះអោយដាច់ពីគ្នា។
ពេលវេលានឹងនាំអោយលោកបានទទួលផល
ល្អ តែលោកត្រូវរៀនអត់ធ្មត់ កុំលោតតាមការ
ចាក់ពីអ្នកដទៃ។
In have seen many people approched Sam Rainsy to give him advice, but from my observation, those people didn't seem to know what they were talking about. I know he always asks a few knowledgible people.
លោកសមរង្ស៊ីមានស្ថានភាពដូចសព្វថ្ងៃ គឺមកពីគាត់សេពគប់ជាមួយជនជ្រុលនិយមនៅបរទេសច្រើនពេក !
12:39Am " no bony wants Som Raing Sy to go to Jail?
Yourn wants him to go to jail because he made too much noise and without him making noise who knows how much more lands that Hun Sen willing to give to Yourn.
Regarding his removal of the temp. border posts, Yourns farmers used to picked it and throw it away while they plow the field and Yourn government never sent their own people to jail.
And complain to សភា?
How many times that SRS members asking Heng Sam Rin and Hun Sen about the border and illegal yourn in Cambodia and those monkeys said they don' t have to answer that question?
សម រង្សីជាមនុស្សសំដីស្រី ក្បាលរឹង មិនែមនជាអ្នកដឹកនាំឆ្លាតវាងវៃទេ។
ខ្ញុំគាំទ្រការប្រឆាំងតាមរបៀបលោកស៊ុន ឆៃ គឺមានប្រសិទ្ធភាពណាស់ ហើយគេចាប់កំហុសមិនបានផង។
ខ្ញុំពីមុនគាំទ្រម្សៀរង្សីណាស់។ តែតាមដានសកម្មភាពគាត់យូរៗ ទៅ គឺជាមនុស្សគួឲ្យខកចិត្តទៅវិញទេ។ ឥឡូវនេះ មិនគាំទ្រ មិនចូលចិត្ត មិនចង់ស្តាំ មិនចង់ឃើញសូម្បីតែរូបថត។
និយាយមិនគឹតវែងឆ្ងាយ។ និយាយយូរៗ មិនដូចមាត់ សាបរលាបខ្លួនឯង។ មានអ្នកផ្តល់យោបល់ល្អៗ ឲ្យច្រើន តែម្សៀក្បាលរឹង សំដីស្រីនេះមិនតាមទេ មានៈបំផុត ។
ឈប់យកជីវិតប្រជាជនខ្មែរជាអាជិវកម្មនយោបាយរបស់អ្នកទៀត។ បើយើងខ្លាំងពិតត្រូវហ៊ានតស៊ូស្លាប់រស់ជាមួយរាស្រ្ត កុំរត់ចោលស្រុកយករស់តែម្នាក់ឯង។
Post a Comment