by School of Vice
Opposition parties will need more young recruits and
activists like Ms Sin Rozeth who will help the party to reach out to the towns
and villages across the country. The more recruits it can attract the better if
only to compensate the party's current lack of mass media coverage. But, it is
vital that every recruit is thoroughly screened and their activities
meticulously monitored to guard against lapses in discipline or infiltration
and sabotage effort aimed at weakening the party's movement in every respect.
The party should be 'fun' and relevant to join, but should
be rewarding in terms of personal development or growth as well. Exceptional
talents should be welcomed; someone who will be morally upright and steadfast,
and if needs be training and further guidance should be extended to them so
that the leadership can entrust them with specific responsibilities vis a vis
the population as well as carrying out their role as commanding officers in
relations to the rest of activists acting as the party's foot-soldiers.
The party must clearly spell out its core principles first
and foremost to its own rank and file members and be prepared to take ‘ruthless
measures’ or subject them to stern internal disciplinary codes if and when any
of them violates or breaches such codes. If the guilty member shows clear
manifest desire to reform him/herself and the misdeed committed not serious
enough to warrant expulsion then the party should also show reciprocal desire
to persevere with such individuals. Sometimes a reformed offender can turn out
to be the party's more loyal member.
The party's leadership itself needs to compose of varied
individuals and talents: it needs to be able to relate to specific situation or
phenomenon unencumbered by its own dogma and theoretical refinements. Every arising phenomenon,
every social calamity and crisis presents possibilities and opportunities for the
party to pitch down its tent and make its political presence felt. Activists
must be encouraged and trained to grasp social geography and terrain with all their
apparent and less obvious features clearly laid out and sussed in their minds
even before arriving at the scene. Ordinary people may lack the gift of vision
or ability to see things beyond their immediate want and preoccupations, but
they know what really matters for them and their families; it is this certainty
that the prospective activist must address, work around on or add something to,
and more. It is no use decrying their perceived mental ‘insularity’ as an
example of backwardness or "ignorance". The mindset of a peasant or
an urban worker can be just as opaque and cunning as that of a scholar; and in
fact, generally they are more so as can be demonstrated by the longevity of the
country's incumbent rulers who had been extracted from the stock of the
peasantry, and since they had once shared and lived the life of the peasant and
drank from the same well, they perhaps know instinctively how best to exploit
the peasants' fears or to appease the latter’s aspirations to their own
political advantage.
The ideal party activist will have something material and
pertinent to offer every potential recruit encountered, be it a remote
hill-tribesman, a slum-dweller, a garment worker, a state employee, a rice
farmer, a high school student or a university undergraduate, and even members
of opposing parties provided the said activist is in sound intellectual command
of each and every such prospective subject individual's overall, specific
situation. However, if you don't know any of these things try Plato's tentative
method and ask him relevant questions likely to yield the answers you seek!
"Pragmatism" is often mistaken or exploited for
all kind of motives - we should not seek to "change things for the
better" and yet end up reproducing the precise same things in new clever
guises. There must be an undoubted political will to overhaul the overall
political culture, and reinstitute a healthy one in replacement on a sound,
steady footing. Sihanouk had his chance to do this during his reign, but hadn't
bothered to do so. The present leaders . . . well, they are a nightmare really
since they are nothing more and nothing less than causal embodiments and
outcomes of that former monarch's crucial political failings for whatever
reason, including the one just mentioned.
I cannot emphasise enough the importance of organisational
cohesion and mobilisation. Cambodia is being confronted with ‘threats’ on two
main fronts even if both can be described as intertwined in relations to one
another i.e. external and internal threats. It is up to opposition party
strategists to devise appropriate means by which to counter or neutralise these
threats. For now, however, it must expand and consolidate its influence and
presence through mobilisation and activism. It is of secondary importance that
a party's leader is in exile, but he or she must ensure that his/ her moral and
strategic guidance and spiritual presence is felt by all the party's affiliates
and followers at every level; that every party worker must be promoted and
demoted on merit and not through personal favour and connection. Above all,
there shall be one unified life force coursing through the veins of the party
and into the channels of every commune and every district, and every
principality, and every factory and every place of work and every place of
leisure enriching the impoverished with practical support and insights and
converting the affluent with ideas and unquestioned patriotism. Go forth and multiply!
22 comments:
No Cambodian political parties worked as hard as Sam Rainsy Party to served the Cambodian people and protected Cambodia. All Cambodian must vote for Sam Rainsy Party now before Cambodia is disappearing from the World map by the Vietnamese expansion.
Mrs. Mu Sochua is the iron lady of
Cambodia!
Hun sen is afraid of her popularity that's why he has tried to humiliate unsuccessfully.
She should replace Sam Rainsy as SRP leader. Go Mu go!
School of Vice if you are a Khmer I salute you for your rare wisdom.
Your editorial is VERY WELL written, but the figureheads on the current political scene have been shown to be superficial in their knowledge of urgent and critical issues that are plaguing the Khmer masse today. They are inherently self-righteous and inflexible elite in their attitude toward the people that support them, they simply want to be the BOSS and ignore their duty in cultivating and nurturing more leadership among the rank and file; and yet they expect changes by playing the same repertoire used by the successive and previously failed self-proclaimed leadership and regime. To them politic is not a MEANS to an end but an END in ITSELF.
I doubt very much that any of the opposition leadership you are seeing today would heed your advice. And with all the noises about unifying the opposition parties and such, if the same old attitude prevails, Khmer must be prepare to endure pain and suffering much, much longer if not total disintegration all together.
Thank for contributing such a fine article.
Very graceful for the article from School of Advice,very educated and in its meaning throughly defined a ways to promoting peace and prosperous in term of the way to democracy country.We thankful for taking the time to write article and helping to shape our nation. Hopefully, our youth and our leader taking the time to read and really try to comprehend your article. Thank!!!!!
Thanks for the great article School of Vice.
I'm proud of her work. We must rise up for our sake.
I salute and give my respect to Ms Mu Sochua and all of SRP members especially Mr. Sam Rainsy himself for their unrelenting effort to
save our country.
Best wishes and good luck to all Khmer nationalists !!
Bun Thoeun
So, true sometimes, some political leaders only want fame for themselves and forgot about how to improve their society and as a result of this, their aim will soon die with them. Sometimes because they have great fear, greed, and intimidation. Thinking that the other person might oneday take their job instead and more popular than them. What a foolish thinking, this is also known 'un-organised or un-civilised, un-unified nature of aggression'. An example of this was the story of the previous king, he decided to be both king and prime-minister and then whoever smarter than him are gone, dead. Sadly, today is not much different from those of the past. It is still continuing until these days too, another example is Hun Sen govt. People/leaders need to change the way they work that is, to be smarter,open minded and be united. Do not be afraid to share skills and power mong each other. Now, there is no time to compare or compete but be cooperated.
Nothing and absolutely nothing at all will ever change in Cambodia among the Cambodian political elite. Cambodian political elite will not change out of conscience; for doing so would mean to do away with all the glory and wealth they could gather for themselves without having to answer to their people how they've got them.
Change will only come when the ordinary Cambodians who are the residents of Cambodia mature politically and understand the need to take control of their country by directing the politicians in the direction they want to see their country go and their lives improved.
Until then, Cambodia will proceed as usual and even get worse as destruction of the country's natural resources and environment continue at an alarming rate without any proper control, balance, and transparency.
Pissed off
She could not replace Mr. Sam Rainsy, because the Sam Rainsy is a Sam Rainsy party. Their bord and member of the party don't want to have a women as their leader.
THIS looser king is not khmer blood that why they make a big plan with Ho-chimin to great Khmerouge regime in Cambodia and the killing continuation on and on The first problem is ( KHMER PEOPLE THEMSELVES DID NOT learn AND THINKS ENOUGE THEY SHOULD WAKE UP SINCE ,1979 )...SO the khmerouge regime did not teaching you enought.. ?OR they did not went througth enough...?and the second (PROBLEM IS POLITIC PARTY THEMSELVES < SPECIALLY SAMRANCY PARTY DID NOT KNOW WHERE THEY GOING > and Mr Samrancy himself show a weakness of leader ship he always suporting Sihanuk (AM I wrong..?)by the way Mr Samrancy never went through the khmerouge regime ..and how about all SAMRANCY SUPORTER who is went through during the khmerouge regime did they surfeit enough...?why they did not correct theirs leader ...? so till this day the true picture is all Samrancy Member party is Uneducated that why no one can stand up and criticize with theirs leader at all ...so who is all those member of Samrancy party ?
SIHANUK IS CHINA BRAINWASH AND SIHANUK IS COMMUNISH SO Mr SAMRANCY IS CHINA BRAINWASH TOO so if i am wrong ...?will find this next election
Sam Ransy didnt through through the Khmer Rogue Regime, does that mean he doesn't know the 32 years of pain our country suffer under another the Khmer Rogue Hun Sen?
Cambodia needs change. Need new leadership and new government. Get ride of the gay King Sihamoni if we have too, he's no better then his father watching 2 million Khmer dying before his eyes.
My question who is our Khmer national HERO?
Most of you are crying for democracy in our country, but don't really act like the people love the democracy.
When you needed this word "democraca" you then use it, when not your behavior are like anarchist or acted like some of the CPP.
The ang san suyi Khmer is born
It is now time to re-think strategy and approach. We can elaborate all these at the party's council level but henceforth it is necessary to align the people on the field. Work should be organized at the rank & file members level, scope and objective should be clearly defined and each result will be analyzed thoroughly to ensure future success.
To follow Ms. Sockhua, each of us should say: tomorrow I will explain my neighbour and the day after I will take on people of my village and next month I will take on the commune council members and this until full understanding of the necessity of the change.
Rank & File member
4:42 PM
Good points, I like to replace your word "tomorrow" with the word "today" because it has more power than tomorrow.
SAM RAINSY a peur de rentrer au CAmbodge. IL trouve toujours un prétexte.
Free is Earn not Given to you for free. The whole world look and learn from the U. S. of A. yes even China. Khmer people are easy minded and have not my problem attitude. You can get away with anything in Cambodia like stealing and murder. Look at the corrupt official, school teacher and government! no one standup for what they did wrong. They going to keep doing it until someone standup and bring them to justic.
To all Khmer people
Want to make a different for Cambodia future. Lean then Go and Vote this election!
Someone please write this message in Khmer to inform Khmer people
Praticality and relevancy???
Peur ou pas peur de rentrer au Cambodge est une chose, mais laisser sa troupe au désarroi même au moment crucial de la campagne électorale, là j'avoue que personne ne peut comprendre. Rainsy, laisses moi reprendre Shakespare: "to be or not to be"?, that is the question. Ankylosé par le résultat du vote communal dernier, je suis encore dans le choc.
Militant de base.
Post a Comment