Wednesday, October 23, 2013

We'll always have Paris

“The international community has spent a lot of money on Cambodia,” CNRP lawmaker-elect Yim Sovann said. “There must be unity and solidarity against the authoritarian regime.” 

United Nations Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar (left), King Norodom Sihanouk (centre) and Philippine Foreign Secretary Raul Manglapus during the Paris Peace Conference in 1991. AFP

Shane Worrell The Phnom Penh Post Wed, 23 October 2013 | Read Khmer version

It may not be a milestone anniversary, but the significance of this day 22 years ago is something the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party wants everyone to remember when it begins its latest mass protest this morning, a spokesman said yesterday.

On this date in 1991, the signing of the Paris Peace Agreements by key members of the international community set Cambodia on a new path – one towards greater peace, democracy and human rights. As far as the CNRP is concerned, Cambodia is a long way from achieving all those goals.

“The international community has spent a lot of money on Cambodia,” CNRP lawmaker-elect Yim Sovann said. “There must be unity and solidarity against the authoritarian regime.”

From today until Friday, the CNRP plans to march at least 1,000 representatives to offices of the UN and to foreign embassies of countries that were signatories to the Paris Peace Agreements.

Weaving in their enduring demands for an investigation into July 28’s national election – officially won by the ruling Cambodian People’s Party 68 seats to 55 – the opposition party will make it known that certain goals of the Paris agreements remain unfulfilled.

“We want to draw the attention of the international community to help guarantee the peace agreements are implemented properly,” he said.

A serious challenge for the CNRP, however, is that thus far, no foreign embassies have been willing to publicly back the opposition, and almost none have taken action that might keep the post-election momentum of CNRP leader Sam Rainsy going.

Australia and France, for instance, have already congratulated Hun Sen on victory.

Nicolas Baudouin, first secretary at the French embassy, declined to comment yesterday on the significance of that gesture, but said, “France will continue to support the democratic development of the country”.

Muhsinin Dolisada, first secretary at the Indonesian embassy in Phnom Penh, spoke more specifically.

Indonesia, which played a central role in the signing of the 1991 agreements in France, doesn’t “have any further commitment” to the matter beyond accepting a petition, he said.

“Yes, we were signatories, and at that time [1991], our foreign minister, I believe, was co-chair,” he said. “But it’s difficult for us to comment [now] on [democracy and human rights] here. It is an internal situation.”

US embassy spokesman Sean McIntosh declined to answer questions about a planned CNRP march on his office.

“We support democratic development in Cambodia,” he said. “In regards to the scheduled protests, we support the right of people to gather peacefully.”

But Sovann said he was confident that signatories – in particular the US – supported what the CNRP was doing and hoped they would “speak in one voice to ensure … Cambodia is back on track to democracy”.

‘Leave it to us’
Even if embassies were to strongly support the CNRP’s position, they can only do so much, senior CPP lawmaker Cheam Yeap warned yesterday.

“They [the CNRP] can commemorate the anniversary of the Paris agreements … but the signatory countries cannot interfere in Cambodia’s political situation, only provide recommendations.”

Yeap questioned the CNRP’s strategy of linking its protest to the peace agreements, saying the “spirit of the Paris agreement – 97 per cent of it – was included in the 1993 Constitution”.

“The country has since become the Kingdom of Cambodia – which is sovereign and has integrity,” he said.

Not everyone thinks it’s that simple. When former Australian Foreign Minister Gareth Evans, a significant player in the Paris process, spoke after King Father Norodom Sihanouk’s death last year, he lamented the difficulties Cambodia has faced since elections run by the UN Transitional Authority in Cambodia in 1993.

“When we set in train the UN peace plan for Cambodia in 1989, it was with a three-part agenda, the hope being to deliver not just peace, but democracy and human rights as well,” he said. “I suspected at the time that we were being a little optimistic on the latter two objectives, and this has absolutely proved to be the case.”

Indeed, accord signatories signed a document which undertook to “promote and encourage respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Cambodia … to prevent the recurrence of human rights abuses”.

Ideals and reality

It’s with this in mind that many can understand why Rainsy has sought audiences with Western donors and signatories to keep pushing for an investigation into election results, rather than accept the huge gains his party made.

Cambodian historian David Chandler said yesterday the CNRP’s “objection is legitimate”.

But the problem, he said, was that such an objection did not correspond with the reality of Cambodia.

“A three-day rally seems worrisome,” he said, projecting a worst-case scenario. “If it gathers momentum, that suggests casualties to me.”

A more pragmatic approach for Rainsy, Chandler added, would be for his party to accept its 55 seats.

“I think that Rainsy is betraying the people who voted for him. If you win seats, you’re supposed to take them.”

But the CNRP’s Sovann said demonstrations to demand reform and justice are what people want.

“We are representing the majority of workers in Cambodia. It’s not about our own interests.”



Anonymous said...

ការចរចាគ្នាណាក្រៅអំពី «ការបង្កេីតគណ:កម្មាធិការឯករាជ្យដេីម្បីត្រួតពិនិត្យមេីលលទ្ធផលឆ្នោត» គឺជា «ការចរចាបែងចែកអំណាច
គ្នា» យ៉ាងពិតប្រាកដណាស់ !! បេីពំុនោះទេ ត្រូវងេីបដេីរចេញ !!
លី ឌៀប

Anonymous said...

«ការចរចាបែងចែកអំណាចគ្នា» ក៏ដូចគ្នានិង «ការទាមទារតុល្យភាពអំណាច»
ដែរ... ទង្វេីទាំង២នេះ គឺជាទង្វេី «ក្បត់ឆន្ទ:បាតុករនិងពលរដ្ធខ្មែរ» យ៉ាងពិត
ប្រាកដណាស់ !!
លី ឌៀប

Anonymous said...

៥៥ យកមិនយក?៥៥ យកមិនយក?៥៥ យកមិនយក?

ទោះជាពួកអាអស់ឯងខំប្រឹងស្រែក ធ្វើមហាតបាតុកម្ម ឬ មហាតបាតុកម្មសូត្រធម៌,,,,, មហាតបាតុកម្មស្មូត្រ, មហាតបាតុកម្មភាវនា, មហាតបាតុកម្មសមាធិ, លុតជង្គុង ក្រាបទូល
ក្រោមល្អងធូលីព្រះបាទ, ប្តឹងទៅតុលាការ ឬ ចង់ប្តឹងទៅអង្គការសហប្រជាជាតិជាមួយស្នាមមេដៃ ឲ្យបែកមេឃ រញ្ជួយផែនដីទៀត
ក៍ផែនដីនេះមិនទាន់ដល់វេនពួកអាអស់ឯងដែរ នៅមានឯកឧត្ដមបណ្ឌិត
ហ៊ុន ម៉ាណែត ហ៊ុន ម៉ានិត ទៀត ។ល។ និង។ល។
ផែនដីនេះមិនអាចមាន ព្រះអាទិត្យពីររះលើផែនដីតែមួយបានឡើយ។
ចេះច្បាប់បោះឆ្នោតទេ? ចេះគណិតសាស្ដ្រទេ? ៥០+១ = ១២៣/២=៦១.៥+១=៦២.៥
លេខចេញយ៉ាងច្បាស់ចាញ់ហើយ មិនព្រមចាញ់ទៀត
ត្រូវចាំណា សមេ្តចបណ្ឌិតអគ្គមហាសេនាបតីតេជោ ហ៊ុន សែន វរ្ម័នទី១ មិនមែនជាមនុស្សលោកទេ សមេ្តចជាព្រះបាទ ហ៊ុន ទៀន ចាប់ជាតិ សមេ្តចជាព្រះបាទធម្មិក សមេ្តចជាព្រះអាទិទេព សមេ្តចជាទេវតារស់មកសង្គ្រោះប្រជាជនកម្ពុជា និងប្រទេសកម្ពុជាឱ្យ សម្បូរសប្បាយ រង់រឿង និងសុខក្សេមក្សាន្ដ!!!

សមេ្តចជាព្រះអាទិត្យតែមួយ រះលើផែនដីនេះ...។
ជយោ! សមេ្តចបណ្ឌិតអគ្គមហាសេនាបតីតេជោ ហ៊ុន សែន វរ្ម័នទី១ ជាទេវតានៃកម្ពុជា!!!

បរាជ័យ! ពួកអាខ្មែរក្បត់ជាតិរត់ចោលស្រុក!

បរាជ័យពួកអាសត្វឆ្កែបរទេស (!!)

បរាជ័យពួកអាកាកសំណល់បាតសង្គម (!!)


ហ្ការី អ៊ឹង
សមាគមខ្មែរឡុងប៉ិចរដ្ឋកាលីហ្វ័រញ៉ា និងជា
បេក្ខជន ស្ថានកុងស៊ុលខ្មែរប្រចាំឡុងប៉ិចរដ្ឋកាលីហ្វ័រញ៉ា

Anonymous said...

"I think that Rainsy is betraying the people who voted for him. If you win seats, you’re supposed to take them.”

Well, Mr. David Chandler if you already know the reality of the situation in Cambodia, you shouldn't made any above comment. But I think you been bought by those CRIMINAL CPP.

As you you know, it's not about National Assembly seats, but it's about change from CRIMINAL COMMUNIST ruler to DEMOCRATIC ruler with term limit. So stop taking bribe and accusing Khmer peoples who are fighting for JUSTICES and for the sake of Cambodia.