Read the CLASSICS -- free downloading of complete books for your library!
Other great pieces of literature at the Christian Classics Ethereal Library:
The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment
by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, my two all-time favorite novels
"Since its publication, it has been acclaimed all over the world by intellectuals as one of the supreme achievements in literature."
https://app.box.com/s/xx0llgjz176r2dcg32bz
Book I: The History of a Family: (Chapter 1) Fyodor Pavlovitch Karamazov
Book I: The History of a Family: (chapter 2) He Gets Rid of His Elder Son
Very shortly after getting his four-year-old Mitya
off his hands Fyodor Pavlovitch married a second time. His second marriage
lasted eight years. He took this second wife, Sofya Ivanovna, also a very young
girl, from another province, where he had gone upon some small piece of
business in company with a Jew. Though Fyodor Pavlovitch was a drunkard and a
vicious debauchee he never neglected investing his capital, and managed his
business affairs very successfully, though, no doubt, not over-scrupulously. Sofya
Ivanovna was the daughter of an obscure deacon, and was left from childhood an orphan
without re-lations. She grew up in the house of a general's widow, a wealthy
old lady of good position, who was at once her benefactress and tormentor. I do
not know the details, but I have only heard that the orphan girl, a meek and
gentle creature, was once cut down from a halter in which she was hanging from
a nail in the loft, so terrible were her sufferings from the capriceand
everlasting nagging of this old woman, who was apparently not bad-hearted but
had become an insufferable tyrant through idleness.
Fyodor Pavlovitch made her an offer; inquiries were
made about him and he was refused. But again, as in his first marriage, he
proposed an elopement to the orphan girl. There is very little doubt that she
would not on any account have married him if she had known a little more about
him in time. But she lived in another province; besides, what could a little girl
of sixteen know about it, except that she would be better at the bottom of the river
than remaining with her benefactress. So the poor child exchanged a
benefactress for a benefactor. Fyodor Pavlovitch did not get a penny this time,
for the general's widow was furious. She gave them nothing and cursed them
both. But he had not reckoned on a dowry; what allured him was the remarkable
beauty of the innocent girl, above all her innocent appearance, which had a
peculiar attraction for a vicious profligate, who had hitherto admired only the
coarser types of feminine beauty.
"Those innocent eyes slit my soul up like a
razor," he used to say afterwards, with his loathsome snigger. In a man so
depraved this might, of course, mean no more than sensual attraction. As he had
received no dowry with his wife, and had, so to speak, taken her "from the
halter," he did not stand on ceremony with her. Making her feel that she
had "wronged" him, he took advantage of her phenomenal meekness and
submissiveness to trample on the elementary decencies of marriage. He gathered
loose women into his house, and carried on orgies of debauchery in his wife's
presence. To show what a pass things had come to, I may mention that Grigory,
the gloomy, stupid, obstinate, argumentative servant, who had always hated his
first mistress, Adelaida Ivanovna, took the side of his new mistress. He championed
her cause, abusing Fyodor Pavlovitch in a manner little befitting a servant, and
on one oc-casion broke up the revels and drove all the disorderly women out of
the house. In the end this unhappy young woman, kept in terror from her
childhood, fell into that kind of nervous disease which is most frequently
found in peasant women who are said to be "possessed by devils." At
times after terrible fits of hysterics she even lost her reason. Yet she bore
Fyodor Pavlovitch two sons, Ivan and Alexey, the eldest in the
first year of marriage and the second three years later. When she died, little
Alexey was in his fourth year, and, strange as it seems, I know that he
remembered his mother all his life, like a dream, of course. At her death
almost exactly the same thing happened to the two little boys as to their elder
brother, Mitya. They were completely forgotten and abandoned by their father. They
were looked after by the same Grigory and lived in his cottage, where they were
found by the tyrannical old lady who had brought up their mother. She was still
alive, and had not, all those eight years, forgotten the insult done her. All
that time she was obtaining exact information as to her Sofya's manner of life,
and hearing of her illness and hideous surroundings she declared aloud two or
three times to her retainers:
"It serves her right. God has punished her for
her ingratitude. "Exactly three months after Sofya Ivanovna's death the
general's widow suddenly appeared in our town, and went straight to Fyodor
Pavlovitch's house. She spent only half an hour in the town but she did a great
deal. It was evening. Fyodor Pavlovitch, whom she had not seen for those eight years,
came in to her drunk. The story is that instantly upon seeing him, without any
sort of explanation, she gave him two good, resounding slaps on the face,
seized him by a tuft of hair, and shook him three times up and down. Then,
without a word, she went straight to the cottage to the two boys. Seeing, at
the first glance, that they were un-washed and in dirty linen, she promptly
gave Grigory, too, a box on the ear, and announcing that she would carry off
both the children she wrapped them just as they were in a rug, put them in the carriage,
and drove off to her own town. Grigory accepted the blow like a devoted slave,
without a word, and when he escorted the old lady to her carriage he made her a
low bow and pronounced impressively that, "God would repay her for
orphans." "You are a blockhead all the same," the old lady
shouted to him as she drove away.
Fyodor Pavlovitch, thinking it over, decided that
it was a good thing, and did not refuse the general's widow his formal consent
to any proposition in regard to his children's education. As for the slaps she
had given him, he drove all over the town telling the story.
It happened that the old lady died soon after this,
but she left the boys in her will a thousand roubles each "for their
instruction, and so that all be spent on them exclusively, with the condition
that it be so portioned out as to last till they are twenty-one, for it is more
than adequate provision for such children. If other people think fit to throw
away their money, let them." I have not read the will myself, but I heard
there was something queer of the sort, very whimsically expressed. The
principal heir, Yefim Petrovitch Polenov, the Marshal of Nobility of the
province, turned out, however, to be an honest man. Writing to Fyodor Pavlovitch,
and discerning at once that he could extract nothing from him for his
children's education (though the latter never directly refused but only
procrastinated as he always did in such cases, and was, indeed, at times effusively
sentimental), Yefim Petrovitch took a personal interest in the orphans. He
became especially fond of the younger, Alexey who lived for a
long while as one of his family. I beg the reader to note this from the beginning.
And to Yefim Petrovitch, a man of a generosity and humanity rarely to be met
with, the young people were more indebted for their education and bringing up
than to anyone. He kept the two thousand roubles left to them by the general's
widow intact, so that by the time they came of age their portions had been
doubled by the accumulation of interest. He educated them both at his own
expense, and certainly spent far more than a thousand roubles upon each of
them. I won't enter into a detailed account of their boyhood and youth, but will
only mention a few of the most important events. Of the elder, Ivan, I will
only say that he grew into a somewhat morose and reserved, though far from
timid boy. At ten years old he had realised that they were living not in their
own home but on other people's charity, and that their father was a man of whom
it was disgraceful to speak. This boy began very early, almost in his infancy
(so they say at least), to show a brilliant and unusual aptitude for learning.
I don't know precisely why, but he left the family of Yefim Petrovitch when he
was hardly thirteen, entering a Moscow gymnasium and boarding with an
experienced and celebrated teacher, an old friend of Yefim Petrovitch. Ivan
used to declare afterwards that this was all due to the "ardour for good works"
of Yefim Petrovitch, who was captivated by the idea that the boy's genius
should be trained by a teacher of genius. But neither Yefim Petrovitch nor this
teacher was living when the young man finished at the gymnasium and entered the
university. As Yefim Petrovitch had made no provision for the payment of the
tyrannical old lady's legacy, which had grown from one thousand to two, it was
delayed, owing to formalities inevitable in Russia, and the young man was in
great straits for the first two years at the university, as he was forced to
keep himself all the time he was studying. It must be noted that he did not
even attempt to communicate with his father, perhaps from pride, from contempt
for him, or perhaps from his cool common sense, which told him that from such a
father he would get no real assistance. However that may have been, the young
man was by no means despondent and succeeded in getting work, at first giving
sixpenny lessons and afterwards getting paragraphs on street incidents into the
newspapers under the signature of "Eye-Witness." These paragraphs, it
was said, were so interesting and piquant that they were soon taken. This alone
showed the young man's practical and intellectual
superiority over the masses of needy and unfortunate students of both sexes who
hang about the offices of the newspapers and journals, unable to think of
anything better than everlasting entreaties for copying and translations from
the French. Having once got into touch with the editors Ivan Fyodorovitch
always kept up his connection with them, and in his latter years at the
university he published brilliant reviews of books upon various special
subjects, so that he became well known in literary circles. But only in his
last year he suddenly succeeded in attracting the attention of a far wider
circle of readers, so that a great many people noticed and remembered him. It
was rather a curious incident. When he had just left the university and was
preparing to go abroad upon his two thousand roubles, Ivan Fyodorovitch
published in one of the more important journals a strange article, which
attracted general notice, on a subject of which he might have been supposed to
know nothing, as he was a student of natural science. The article dealt with a
subject which was being debated every-where at the time- the position of the
ecclesiastical courts. After discussing several opinions on the subject he went
on to explain his own view. What was most striking about the article was its
tone, and its unexpected conclusion. Many of the Church party regarded him un-questioningly
as on their side. And yet not only the secularists but even atheists joined
them in their applause. Finally some sagacious persons opined that the article
was nothing but an impudent satirical burlesque. I mention this incident
particularly because this article penetrated into the famous monastery in our
neighbourhood, where the inmates, being particularly interested in question of
the ecclesiastical courts, were completely bewildered by it. Learning the
author's name, they were interested in his being a native of the town and the
son of "that Fyodor Pavlovitch." And just then it was that the author
himself made his appearance among us.
Why Ivan Fyodorovitch had come amongst us I
remember asking myself at the time with a certain uneasiness. This fateful
visit, which was the first step leading to so many consequences, I never fully
explained to myself. It seemed strange on the face of it that a young man so
learned, so proud, and apparently so cautious, should suddenly visit such an
infamous house and a father who had ignored him all his life, hardly knew him,
never thought of him, and would not under any circumstances have given him
money, though he was always afraid that his sons Ivan and Alexey would also
come to ask him for it. And here the young man was staying in the house of such
a father, had been living with him for two months, and they were on the best
possible terms. This last fact was a special cause of wonder to many others as
well as to me. Pyotr Alexandrovitch Miusov, of whom we have spoken already, the
cousin of Fyodor Pavlovitch's first wife, happened to be in the neighbourhood
again on a visit to his estate. He had come from Paris, which was his permanent
home. I remember that he was more surprised than anyone when he made the
acquaintance of the young man, who interested him extremely, and with whom he
sometimes argued and not without inner pang compared himself in acquirements.
"He is proud," he used to say, "he
will never be in want of pence; he has got money enough to go abroad now. What
does he want? Everyone can see that he hasn't come for money, for his father
would never give him any. He has no taste for drink and dissipation, and yet
his father can't do without him. They get on so well together!" That was
the truth; the young man had an unmistakable influence over his father, who
positively appeared to be behaving more decently and even seemed at times ready
to obey his son, though often extremely and even spitefully perverse.
It was only later that we learned that Ivan had
come partly at the request of, and in the interests of, his elder brother, Dmitri,
whom he saw for the first time on this very visit, though he had before leaving
Moscow been in correspondence with him about an important matter of more
concern to Dmitri than himself. What that business was the reader will learn
fully in due time. Yet even when I did know of this special circumstance I
still felt Ivan Fyodorovitch to be an enigmatic figure, and thought his visit
rather mysterious.
I may add that Ivan appeared at the time in the
light of a mediator between his father and his elder brother Dmitri, who was in
open quarrel with his father and even planning to bring an action against him.
The family, I repeat, was now united for the first
time, and some of its members met for the first time in their lives. The
younger brother, Alexey, had been a year already among us, having been the
first of the three to arrive. It is of that brother Alexey I find it most
difficult to speak in this introduction. Yet I must give some preliminary
account of him, if only to explain one queer fact, which is that I have to
introduce my hero to the reader wearing the cassock of a novice. Yes, he had
been for the last year in our monastery, and seemed willing to be cloistered
there for the rest of his life.
Very shortly after getting his four-year-old Mitya off his hands Fyodor Pavlovitch married a second time. His second marriage lasted eight years. He took this second wife, Sofya Ivanovna, also a very young girl, from another province, where he had gone upon some small piece of business in company with a Jew. Though Fyodor Pavlovitch was a drunkard and a vicious debauchee he never neglected investing his capital, and managed his business affairs very successfully, though, no doubt, not over-scrupulously. Sofya Ivanovna was the daughter of an obscure deacon, and was left from childhood an orphan without re-lations. She grew up in the house of a general's widow, a wealthy old lady of good position, who was at once her benefactress and tormentor. I do not know the details, but I have only heard that the orphan girl, a meek and gentle creature, was once cut down from a halter in which she was hanging from a nail in the loft, so terrible were her sufferings from the capriceand everlasting nagging of this old woman, who was apparently not bad-hearted but had become an insufferable tyrant through idleness.
1 comment:
Yes, it's a great classic by Dostoevsky. My favorite translation is by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky which is easy to follow and understand. I read a lot of Russian lits and compared with different translators. Pervear and Volokhonsky are the best.
Post a Comment