Showing posts with label Khieu Kanharith's incoherence and stupidity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Khieu Kanharith's incoherence and stupidity. Show all posts

Sunday, February 22, 2009

A country of contradictions

Sunday February 22, 2009
Miriama Kamo
TVNZ (New Zealand)

We went to meet the affable Information Minister Khieu Kanharith in his grand offices. Lined with ornate Victorian-style leather couches, winged chairs, and plush carpets, his office is not unlike a ballroom. Over green tea in delicate cups I put the apparent funding crisis to the Minister. He waved his hand airily. "There is no concern. We don't need the international funding. We [the government] can pay for this process ourselves."
So, tomorrow we leave. I'm on the balcony of our guesthouse, listening to the tuk tuks, motorbikes, and people going by. Everything is golden, the one lamp spreading a glow across the warm burgundy and ruby patterned tiles.

There's a funeral below, the cheerful chimes accompanying the dead to their new life. It's hot. I can't believe how well things grow in pots here, an embarrassment of life firing from every wide clay tub.

It's easy to be romanced by this city, by the country, though it doesn't ask to be fallen in love with...perhaps that's what makes it so beguiling: it is what it is.

But despite its simple appeal there is so much which makes this a country of contradictions. The fact that its history belies the reality of its friendly nature today is one. Here, a beautiful temple, there, a baby and his mother sleep on a filthy grey-encrusted roadside mattress. Here, acres of green rice fields lined with water buffalo, there, a shirt growing out of the dirt of the Killing Fields. Yes, just centimetres below your feet likely lie the remains of a human being, yet here is a friendly tuktuk driver touting for business.

I find the war crimes trials contradictory.

On the one hand, they represent hope; finally a process for peace and resolution begins for Cambodians. On the other hand are allegations of corruption and kickbacks, funding crises, and criticisms that the process is fatally flawed.

Today the ECCC (Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia) expresses fear that it's facing bankruptcy within weeks. We go to ask the Government's Information Minister; he says that's wrong.

The court hails the trials as a vital step to resolution for Cambodia, yet the Minister says the trials are not important to the ordinary Cambodian.

So, here's what happened. We met Sambath Reach again, a spokesperson for the ECCC. Last time we talked about the unusual rainfall on trial day one, and he called himself Spokesperson for the Ghosts. Today, I spoke to him about his and the court's concerns that bankruptcy is pending, that the long awaited judicial process is in danger of collapsing.

He gave it one month. "We need more money."

Sadly, for this problem there is no immediate solution. The Court came under fire last year after allegations some staff were forced to pay kickbacks for their jobs; the UNDP froze funding and staff worked unpaid for around two months. The Japanese government kicked in some funds and the court was on its feet again, but now, the money is running out once more.

Should the court process collapse, I asked Sambath Reach, what would this mean? "Justice will be cheated."

We went to meet the affable Information Minister Khieu Kanharith in his grand offices. Lined with ornate Victorian-style leather couches, winged chairs, and plush carpets, his office is not unlike a ballroom. Over green tea in delicate cups I put the apparent funding crisis to the Minister. He waved his hand airily. "There is no concern. We don't need the international funding. We [the government] can pay for this process ourselves."

Will the court collapse, do court officials need to be concerned? "No" was the resolute answer.

So, what is the correct answer?

Just how endangered are these proceedings and if they are, to what extent can the Cambodian government, alone, deliver the type of justice they've committed to deliver to Cambodians and the international community? And how much is this constant uncertainty going to damage their ability to fulfil their 'mission'?

For court officials and those we met at the Tribunal, this commitment to justice through the trials is absolute and crucial to healing Cambodian hearts and minds. The Minister sees things differently. For him the ordinary Cambodian has little interest in the trials and does not see them as a path to peace.

From the Minister's perspective, the trials are more symbolic, a catalyst for historians to investigate more deeply into the Khmer Rouge mentality, to find out 'why' and 'how' things went so wrong. For him, this is more crucial, more important than the enactment of trials.

And as for the idea that Cambodians need to see these trials play out to find peace and resolution, the Minister says this is incorrect: "We find peace inside ourselves".

It needs to be said that the Minister supports the trials nonetheless.

Complex.

We left his golden and rich brocade office and stepped out into the oppressive heat, dust flying around our legs.

Yes, this is a country of contradictions. The trials are important to the ordinary Cambodian, the trials aren't important to the ordinary Cambodian. The proceedings will collapse, they will never collapse.

We walked down the long languorous sweep of stairs, each one glowing bleach-white under the sun. We passed through the security gates, crowded by graceful palms, and waved down a tuk-tuk, then joined the polluted mania of the city streets.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Political Cartoon: Xmer Law

Cartoon by Sacrava (on the web at http://sacrava.blogspot.com)

Khieu Kanharith dismisses AI findings: "Maybe Amnesty International doesn’t know Cambodian law" -sic!-

At least 40 were injured during the eviction in Kbal Spean, near Poipet, including 14 seriously, and 30 villagers were arrested. (Photo: Licadho)

Rights Group Seeks to Stop Forced Evictions

By Chun Sakada, VOA Khmer
Phnom Penh
11 February 2008



The international rights group Amnesty International called on the government Monday to end forced evictions.

The displacement from people from land claimed by government officials or businesses is causing thousands to suffer, the group said, citing dozens of cases.

Speaking from the disputed Dey Krahorm neighborhood of Phnom Penh, Brittis Edman, a researcher for Amnesty International, called on the government to cease forced evictions until better laws are in place to guarantee property protection.

At least 150,000 people have been affected by forced displacement, she said, adding that the government has an obligation under international law to protect populations from such removal.

Government spokesman Khieu Kanharith dismissed the group’s findings.

Maybe Amnesty International doesn’t know Cambodian law,” Khieu Kanharith said. “If you only talk jokingly like this it could destroy your reputation.”

Sam Ny, a 33-year-old resident of Dey Krahorm, an area where many families are facing eviction, said companies who want the land should buy it at a fair market price.

We only want appropriate compensation for us to move from this land,” he said. “And then we won’t be against them anymore.”

Forced evictions in the area have lead to the razing of 80 homes and clashes between police and residents. Thirteen people have been arrested a result.

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Khieu Kanharith: The Kenyans are are rude and savage ... and Yash Ghai does not have the Aryan culture

Interview with Khieu Kanharith on Yash Ghai’s issue

25 Dec 2007
By Phan Sophat Radio Free Asia
Translated from Khmer by Heng Soy


Recently, prime minister Hun Sen was extremely angry with Prof. Yash Ghai, and he even used derogatory words to criticize the UN Special Envoy on Human Rights in Cambodia.

What is the reason behind the prime minister’s reaction? Was it because of the declaration about human rights issues in Cambodia reported by Prof. Ghai, or is it because of something else?

The following are the comments given by Khieu Kanharith, government spokesman, during his interview with RFA’s Phan Sophat on this issue. Khieu Kanharith also provides the government’s standing on the future of the UN Human Rights office in Cambodia also.

Phan Sophat (RFA): The first question refers to the government’s reaction against Mr. Yash Ghai, is this due to diplomatic affairs or because of his report?

Khieu Kanharith (KK): It was because Mr. Yash Ghai who only knows about the protocol in the relationships between Cambodia and the UN only. The UN Human Rights office in Cambodia is helping the Cambodian government to push human rights issues, isn’t it? But, up to now, did he ever meet with the Cambodian government or not? Did he ever provide any suggestions to the Cambodian government or not?

Therefore, his role as a spokesman for the opposition would be more appropriate. Since he arrived, he always cursed the government, this is wrong to start with. He should tell the Cambodian government about this issue which should be dealt in this manner, that (issue) should be dealt in that manner, then the Cambodian government will reply back that this is how we should be doing, we will discuss with each other. We should ask: up to now, did he meet with the Cambodian government to provide suggestions on what to do, or not?

RFA: In his report dated 10 December, Mr. Yash Ghai, following the completion of his mission in Cambodia, he indicated that he asked to meet with the prime minister, the minister of Interior, and a number of other ministers, but his requests were rejected by the government ministers and the prime minister. Why is that so?

KK: The level of Mr. Yash Ghai up to now, he does not know about the land dispute problems, for example, does he know, in the many thousands of cases (of land disputes), how many hundreds of them have been resolved already? He does not know yet. Therefore, the first thing he should do is the meet with the land commission, next, he must meet with H.E. Om Yentieng (Hun Sen’s appointed human rights chairman), his counterpart instead.

But, right up front, he demanded to meet with the minister of Interior, this is wrong, this means that he does not even know the working protocol in Cambodia, can you see that?

This means that no one can meet him because of that, because, from the start, regarding land disputes, he (Yash Ghai) should meet with the land commission, next, on human rights issues, he should meet with H.E. Om Yentieng, after these meetings, if the issues cannot be resolved, then these issues will be brought up to a higher level. But, for him, he does not even know what there is in Cambodia yet, this means that he is an extremely lazy UN official, therefore, how can we meet him, when he does not know all the case from the bottom level yet, how can the higher ups meet with him?

RFA: Therefore, Mr. Yash Ghai’s fault which the government opposes to, is it a protocol mistake or is it because his report was not correct, or is it because of something else?

KK: It’s because he is lazy, he did no work, and maybe because the Kenyans are rude and savage like this, this is why (I am) saying that he is an uncivilized [the word used by KK is without “arey-thor”: meaning without Aryan culture] man. At least [UN Envoy] Gambary to Burma did not curse the government, the owner of the house, in this manner. And, the Kenyan culture is to eat someone’s food then break the rice pot in that house [meaning ungrateful], I don’t know, because normally, right away, he demanded to meet with this or that person, while he does not even know any issue yet, how can we resolve (anything with him)? The land disputes, what kind of cases are they? They are not easy or normal issues, therefore, how can the government meet him?

And (because of) this kind of lazy official, that’s why we are thinking that next year, we will decide that, for the best, we should eliminate it, because of the loss in rent, the loss in salaries to our workers, to the chauffeur, we can lose some money but in the 10 ASEAN countries, nobody has (someone like that). To him, he said that human rights in Cambodia is worst than in Burma, worst than Malaysia, this we will think about it, and for the best, he should know that we will close his office next year, (in fact) we are not closing it, we don’t need it.

RFA: Regarding this issue, recently, a (Cambodian) government official sent a letter to the UN Secretary-general, was there any reply yet?

KK: The letter by (Sea Kosal) the permanent representative of Cambodia (at the UN) said that we cannot accept Yash Ghai, and we are reflecting about the need for his office or not? This is the right of the homeowner to allow this office or not? If Cambodia decides to cancel it, it will cancel it.

In the past, we plan to cancel it once already, but based on Mr. Kofi Annan’s request during his meeting with Samdach Dek Cho Hun Sen, he asked for an extension. Now, we think that this extension is enough, it is sufficient already, this is hypothetical only because the prime minister did not decide yet, but we think that this office is enough now.

RFA: But, if there is a decision (to shut down the UN human rights office), when will that happen?

KK: The decision can be made without asking the UN’s opinion, this is a decision by the homeowner (i.e. Cambodia).

RFA: But, if there is such a decision, when will it happen?

KK: Now it’s close to Christmas, we are not touching it, we’ll wait until after the New Year, after the (celebration of the Vietnamese invasion on) 07 January, then we will sit and think about it again, because the foreigners have to visit their wives and children during the Christmas period.

RFA: So, it means that, in the problem of the UN human rights office in Cambodia, there will be no accommodation or negotiation anymore, this means that the closing of this office will take place, right?

KK: Cambodia, as a sovereign state, can make a decision to keep or not. There is no limit to the speed of the negotiation on this [i.e. no set timetable].