Showing posts with label Vietnamese human rights violation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vietnamese human rights violation. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

KKC Statement to ASEM Meeting in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Cease Khmer Krom human rights violations in Vietnam

Khmer Kampuchea Krom Community

May 26 2009

STATEMENT

On the occasion of the Asia-Europe (ASEM) Foreign Ministers Meeting in Phnom Penh on May 27 - 28, 2009, the Khmer Kampuchea Krom Community (KKC) wishes to draw the attention of all the delegations on the issue of the violation of the Human Rights of the Khmer Kampuchea Krom (Mekong Delta) people.

KKC represents all the oppressed Khmer people living on the Mekong Delta would like to appeal to all esteem delegates to look into the problem of the worst violation of human rights of the Vietnamese people especially, the Khmer Kampuchea Krom people by the current Vietnamese authorities. These abuses have taken on the people's freedom of religious belief (the Buddhist religion has been subjected to the tight control of the Vietnamese Communist Party and the Vietnamese Buddhist Sect), the freedom of assembly (associations) and local organizations, and freedom of expression, the prohibition of the Khmer Krom people from studying the Khmer literature and language as well as the forced seizures of the people's land.

KKC sincerely hopes that your esteem delegates will push for the halt of these violations of human rights of its people and to make sure that the human rights situation in Vietnam improved to the acceptable standard especially, the respect of the sacred rights of the indigenous people of Khmer Kampuchea Krom by the Vietnamese authorities.

[Signed]
Thach Setha
Former SRP Senate Member of Cambodia
E-mail: senthach2000@yahoo.com

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

How low can the US go to accomodate Hanoi?

U.S. Downplays Human Rights in Vietnam Leader's Visit

June 23, 2008
by Michael Sullivan
All Things Considered
National Public Radio (USA)


Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung is being received at the White House Tuesday. There are calls on Capitol Hill for President Bush to make human rights a focal point of talks, but the administration is playing up economic cooperation.

Mending Ties: The United States and Vietnam

by Eric Weiner

NPR.org, June 21, 2007 · This week's visit of Vietnamese President Nguyen Minh Triet marks another milestone in relations between these two former enemies. It's the first time a Vietnamese head of state has stepped foot on American soil since the end of the Vietnam War. Reconciliation, though, has taken three decades, and has been fraught with difficulties and setbacks. Here's a look at some of the main issues the two nations have wrestled with over this time:

Missing in Action

The issue of American servicemen missing in Vietnam has been both a point of contention, and also an opportunity for dialogue. For years, it was essentially the only issue that American and Vietnamese diplomats discussed. The U.S. accused Vietnam of withholding information that could help determine the fate of the missing Americans. Vietnam, meanwhile, raised the issue of its missing soldiers from the war, which it says is far higher than the number of missing Americans.

In 1988, the U.S. and Vietnam conducted the first joint field operations to search for information about the American MIAs. In the 1990s, as the U.S. moved to normalize diplomatic ties with Vietnam, some veterans groups protested. The U.S., they argued, needed to maintain pressure on Vietnam on the MIA issue, and Vietnam should not be "rewarded" with the granting of full diplomatic relations. But other Vietnam veterans favored the normalization of ties, including Sens. John McCain and John Kerry, and then-Sens. Bob Kerrey and Charles Robb. Today, there are an estimated 1,800 American military personnel still listed as missing in action in the Vietnam War. About 10 times a year, the Pentagon sends teams to Southeast Asia to search for information that might help bring light to their fates.

Agent Orange

Agent Orange, or dioxin, was an herbicide used by the United States military as a defoliant. (It got its name from the 55-gallon drums marked with orange bands where it was stored.) An estimated 70 million gallons were dropped on South Vietnam during the war in an attempt to destroy crops and forests believed to be harboring Vietcong and North Vietnamese fighters. Rainforests and wildlife were wiped out, and water sources contaminated. Decades later, much of the forest has not regenerated, the environmental group the World Wildlife Fund says.

The impact of Agent Orange on human health is more controversial. Vietnamese officials claim that more than three million people were disabled by dioxin over three generations — citing conditions including lymphoma, diabetes and birth defects. The U.S. has compensated American soldiers who were exposed to the herbicide, but it has long hesitated to help Vietnamese victims. This week's visit of Vietnam's president coincides with the opening of a hearing at a federal appeals court in New York, where the Vietnam Agent Orange Victims Association will seek permission to sue the U.S. firms that made the herbicide.

Diplomatic Relations

The United States broke off all diplomatic relations with Vietnam after the fall of Saigon in 1975. Since then, the two nations have slowly restored ties. Little progress was made in the 1980s, after the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia—an action that was condemned by the United States and much of the world.

In 1991, though, the Pentagon opened an office in Hanoi to help search for MIAs. At that time, the United States also presented Hanoi with a roadmap for phased normalization of relations. In 1995, the two nations officially restored full diplomatic relations, and then-Secretary-of-State Warren Christopher traveled to Hanoi to open a U.S. embassy there.

High-Level Visits

The year 1995 saw a flurry of high-profile American visitors to Vietnam, including former President George H.W. Bush and former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara. The breakthrough visit, though, came in November 2000 when President Bill Clinton made a historic and emotionally charged visit to Hanoi. Clinton was the first U.S. president in office to visit Vietnam since the end of the war. He was greeted by cheering crowds. "I think it is time to write a new chapter here," Clinton said at the time.

In 2005, Vietnamese Prime Minister Phan Van Khai met with President George W. Bush at the White House, and last year, Bush visited Hanoi. Bush's visit, part of an Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, was more perfunctory and subdued than Clinton's. He did, however, attend an ecumenical church service in an effort to underscore the need for greater religious freedom.

Flights

One of the turning points in U.S.-Vietnamese relations came on Dec. 11, 2004, at 10:06 p.m. That's when United Airlines Flight 869 touched down at Tan Son Nhat International Airport in Ho Chi Minh City, formerly Saigon. The flight from San Francisco was the first direct flight between the two nations in nearly 30 years. Prior to this point, the last U.S. commercial carrier to leave Vietnam was a Pan American flight that took off out of the former South Vietnamese capital of Saigon just before it fell to the communists in 1975. Today, such flights are routine, and each year, thousands of American tourists visit Vietnam.

Trade

Immediately after the fall of Saigon in 1975, the United States imposed a trade embargo on the newly unified Vietnam. The embargo stood intact until 1992, when the U.S. allowed commercial sales to Vietnam for humanitarian needs. In 1993, American firms were allowed to bid on development projects financed by international banks. Finally, in 1994, President Clinton announced the lifting of the trade embargo. American firms were free to do business with Vietnam. Today, the United States is Vietnam's largest trading partner, with nearly $10 billion in annual two-way trade. With U.S. backing, Vietnam joined the World Trade Organization early in 2007.

Fred Brown, of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, argues that the sanctions against Vietnam worked. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Vietnam lost its main patron, so it turned to the United States out of economic necessity.

"The Vietnamese are cosmically practical," Brown says. "They knew exactly where their bread was buttered. They needed the U.S., so the process of reconciliation moved very quickly in the 1990s."

Like China, Vietnam is still controlled politically by the Communist party, but economically it has moved toward a free-market system. It began that process—called "doi-moi"—in 1986. Today, Vietnam is one of the world's fastest-growing economies. The country's national airline, for instance, recently ordered several planes from Boeing. Some business leaders, both Vietnamese and American, would like to see the two countries sign a free-trade agreement in hopes of further increasing economic partnership.

Human Rights Issues

The United States has long voiced concerns about human rights abuses in Vietnam, particularly the treatment of political dissidents and members of the Christian minority. Citing "significant improvement towards advancing religious freedom," the State Dept. removed Vietnam last year from a list of nations blacklisted for egregious violations of religious freedom. However, in recent months, Vietnam has arrested or sentenced at least eight pro-democracy activists, including two human rights lawyers and a dissident Catholic priest. The crackdown led to denunciations in Congress and the White House, and at one point threatened to derail President Triet's visit. In recent weeks, Hanoi responded by releasing three high-profile political prisoners.

Saturday, August 11, 2007

Vietnam: Cambodian Monk’s Arrest a Mockery of Justice

By Serey Chau
President of KKFYC (http://www.kkfyc.org)


In September, 2003, the Vietnamese Foreign Ministry told reporters that a Vietnamese Buddhist monk, Venerable Thich Tri Luc, was arrested on July, 2002 at the Cambodia-Vietnam border. The Human Rights organizations around the world, especially the Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, were shocked by that news because Ven. Thich Tri Luc, who was granted a refugee status by UNHCR to live in Cambodia in June, 2002 disappeared after being escorted by an unidentified man from his house on July 25, 2002. The Vietnamese officials had previously denied any knowledge of Ven. Thich Tri Luc’s whereabouts after his disappearance from Cambodia.

On August 1, 2007, the Voice of Vietnam (VOV News) posted an article on its Website announced that the Vietnamese authority just arrested a person who is a “disappeared monk”, Ven. Tim Sakhorn, for attempting to enter Vietnam illegally. The disappeared monk, Ven. Tim Sakhorn was arrested, defrocked, and deported to Vietnam by the Cambodian authorities on June 30, 2007. Just like Ven. Thich Tri Luc’s case, the Vietnamese officials at the Vietnamese Embassy in Cambodia denied any knowledge of Ven. Tim Sakhorn’s whereabouts after he was deported to Vietnam. The spokesman of the Vietnamese Embassy, Trinh Ba Cam, said that Vietnam did not interfere with Cambodia’s internal affairs, so he did not know the whereabouts of Ven. Tim Sakhorn.

Instead of charging Ven. Tim Sakhorn with the initial alleged crime of entering Vietnam illegally, he is being detained and will be tried for the crime of “sabotaging the unification policy” under Article 87 of Vietnam’s Penal Code. Interestingly, Ven. Tim Sakhorn’s case is very similar to Ven. Thich Tri Luc because Ven. Thich Tri Luc was tried under Article 91 of Vietnam’s Penal Code on charges of fleeing abroad in order to oppose the Vietnamese Communist government. It is ironic to see a government who is a member of the United Nations be afraid of Buddhist monks like Ven. Thich Tri Luc, who live on peaceful principles. Now, the Vietnamese Communist government uses the same trick to accused Ven. Tim Sakhorn so they can imprison Ven. Tim Sakhorn.

Ven. Tim Sakhorn was defrocked by the Cambodian authority because they accused him of undermining the relationship between Cambodia and Vietnam. According to Buddhism, a Buddhist monk could only be defrocked if he violates the Buddhist rules. After defrocked Ven. Tim Sakhorn, Cambodian authority realized that they made a mistake because Buddhism is a national religion in Cambodia. Thus, Cambodian authority set up a case that where they searched Ven. Tim Sakhorn’s room, they found pornography pictures and even claim to have seen a lady sleeping on Ven. Tim Sakhorn’s bed. They broadcasted that news on the national Television. That news made the Cambodian public even angrier because everyone realized that it was a setup by the Cambodian government and it is ashamed for Cambodian government to use that dirty trick to against a Buddhist monk like Ven. Tim Sakhorn.

The spokesman of the Vietnamese Embassy in Cambodia now proudly says that Ven. Tim Sakhorn is a Vietnamese citizen, so he must be tried in Vietnam. In reality, Ven. Tim Sakhorn left his hometown in Kampuchea Krom (currently known as South Vietnam) to live in Cambodia with his whole family in 1979. He has no current relatives living in Vietnam. He became a Buddhist monk in 1991 and was promoted to Abbot of North Phnom Denh Temple in 2000. If Ven. Tim Sakhorn is not a Cambodian citizen, he would not be granted a Cambodian Buddhist Monk Identification (called Chay-Ya in Khmer). He would not be nominated to be an Abbot of a temple in Cambodia. If Vietnam still considers Ven. Tim Sakhorn as a Vietnamese citizen even he came to live in Cambodia since 1979, what happens to millions of the Vietnamese people who illegal came to live in Cambodia now. Do they still carry Vietnamese citizen? If they do, should they be returned to Vietnam too? How about the Vietnamese people who came to live in the United States or other countries? Does Vietnam still have a right to arrest them or they just can arrest the people who have Vietnamese citizen in Cambodia?

Vietnamese Communist (VC) government accused Ven. Tim Sakhorn as a member of Khmers Kampuchea-Krom Federation (KKF) who tries to propagate anti-Vietnamese activities. The VC government knows that KKF is a Khmer-Krom Indigenous Peoples Organization that is why KKF can attend the United Nations Permanent Forum for Indigenous Issues (UNPFII) in New York every year because Vietnam also sends it own delegation to attend the forum too. If KKF is an organization that wants to overthrow the Vietnamese government or an organization that is trying to “sabotaging the unification policy” between Vietnamese and Khmer-Krom as the Vietnamese always accuses, then KKF will never be allowed to attend UNPFII. KKF has made many positive recommendations to the VC government to respect the rights of the indigenous peoples in Vietnam. KKF offers to have a dialog with the VC government at the UNPFII, but the VC government always refuses and stubbornly accuses KKF of being a separatist group. Many indigenous peoples and organizations attending the Permanent Forum are greatly disturbed with the VC government’s attitude towards the Khmer Krom people.

Vietnam accused Ven. Tim Sakhorn helped sending KKF’s DVD and documents to Khmer-Krom in Vietnam for the anti-Vietnamese activities. In reality, the KKF’s DVD is just a DVD detailing the activities of KKF at the UNPFII which has Vietnam’s delegation attended too. If Vietnam attended UNPFII every year, why is Vietnam scared to let the Khmer Krom in Kampuchea Krom watch KKF’s DVD so they can know about the activities of KKF members who represented for the voiceless of millions of Khmer Krom in Kampuchea Krom at the UNPFII?

Vietnam is a member of United Nations. The documents that the members of KKF bring to Kampuchea Krom are just documents to promote human rights, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. If Vietnam respects human rights of the Khmer Krom people, why is Vietnam afraid of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a document that everyone on this earth inspires to achieve?

It doesn’t matter what tactics that the VC government uses to accuse Ven. Tim Sakhorn, no one in this world will believe them. The case of Ven. Tim Sakhorn is pretty similar with the “kidnapped” case of Ven. Thich Tri Luc. Unfortunately, the case of Ven. Tim Sakhorn makes the Cambodian people feel really ashamed of their own government because the Cambodian authority actually helped Vietnam to “legally” arrest Ven. Tim Sakhorn at Vietnam-Cambodia border so Vietnam did not need to go to Cambodia to kidnap Ven. Tim Sakhorn as they did to Ven. Thich Tri Luc.

The VC government stubbornly accused Ven. Thich Tri Luc of committing the injustice crime that he did not commit, but they did not succeed because of the pressures of the Human Rights organizations and the countries who respect human rights. They released Ven. Thich Tri Luc to live in Holland now. Unfortunately, the VC government is using the same trick to accuse Ven. Tim Sakhorn of committing the same crime again.

If Vietnam wants to have peace in its country, the VC government must respect human rights of the people in Vietnam, included all its indigenous peoples. If the VC government released Ven. Thich Tri Luc in the past, then the VC government has no rights to imprison Ven. Tim Sakhorn who is a Cambodian Buddhist monk and also a Cambodian citizen.