Showing posts with label Vote buying. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vote buying. Show all posts

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Vote Buying, Gift Giving Improper for Campaign: Experts

Hang Puthea, executive director of the Neutral and Impartial Committee for Free and Fair Elections Photo: by Heng Reaksmey, VOA Khmer
Friday, 25 May 2012
Sok Khemara, VOA Khmer | Washington, DC
“So if people lose the original will, then society will lose as well.”
The campaign period for commune elections has seen a mix of allegations of vote buying and gift giving, among other irregularities, politic analysts and election monitors say.

Ten parties are competing for commune council positions across the country for June 3 polls. Campaigning end June 1.

“If the politicians try to buy people, that causes people to lose original will,” Hang Puthea, executive director of the Neutral and Impartial Committee for Free and Fair Elections, told “Hello VOA” Thursday. “So if people lose the original will, then society will lose as well.”

Saturday, February 04, 2012

How much is a seat at the UNSC? - Foreign Aid and Bribery at the UN

Dear All,

This may be of interest to the discussions on UNSC bid.

It's no coincidence that Cambodia bids for UNSC post now while big powers are jostling for influence and given the Cambodia's relations with all of them.

Conclusions from a working paper on benefits of UNSC posts (from google search) in the document attached.

V. Conclusion
Thus far, we have argued that non-permanent members of the U.N. Security Council receive extra foreign aid from the United States and the United Nations, especially during years when the attention focused on the council is greatest. Our results suggest that council membership itself, and not simply some omitted variable, drives the aid increases. On average, the typical developing country serving on the council can anticipate an additional $16 million from the United States and $1 million from the United Nations. During important years, these numbers rise to $45 million from the United States and $8 million from the United Nations.

Finally, the U.N. finding may actually be further evidence of U.S. influence: UNICEF, an organization over which the United States has historically had great control, seems to be driving the increase in U.N. aid.

Ideally, a study of vote-buying in the United Nations would test for the ability of Security Council aid to influence actual voting. Unfortunately, this is difficult for two reasons. First, we cannot observe the counter-factual: how the country would have voted in the absence of vote-buying activity. Second, votes themselves are strategic. Agenda setters typically know, before putting a resolution up for a vote, the preferences of each member. Perhaps this is why most Security Council resolutions are passed unanimously, and why failed resolutions are rare—recall that the 2003 resolution to authorize the invasion of Iraq never actually came to a vote. Due to these identification problems, we believe that actual outlays of aid are the most trustworthy way to measure the presence of vote-buying in the Security Council. By providing extra aid to non-permanent members of the council, especially during years when council votes are especially important, agenda setters have implicitly revealed their faith in the Security Council’s relevance in world affairs.

V.


http://www.box.com/s/xczloo8zq670nhza8em1

Friday, June 06, 2008

Sam Rainsy addressing constituents in Prey Veng province


On 02 June 2008, MP Sam Rainsy visited constituents in the province of Prey Veng where he gave a speech on the economic and political On 02 June 2008, MP Sam Rainsy visited constituents in the province of Prey Veng where he gave a speech on the economic and political situation in Cambodia.

Monday, March 31, 2008

CPP MP Ho Non: The CPP does not buy votes, it only fullfils promises to voters ... by giving out money to voters when the election approaches

Kul Panha: Some parties will buy votes

Monday, March 31, 2008
Everyday.com.kh
Translated from Khmer by Socheata

During a discussion held last Saturday, focusing on the upcoming July election campaign, Kul Panha, Comfrel Director, said that during the 30-day opened for the election campaign, there will be at least 50% of the parties that will take this opportunity to buy votes from the population. Kul Panha said that the vote buying is a dishonest action that brings in a bad culture because this tendency is not recognized and not supported by the International community. He added that, based on Comfrel’s investigations during the past commune election, there were more than 200 cases of vote buying which took place. He said that these are not individual cases, but they were rather conducted on a large scale basis when activists from major parties met each others to give money and equipments to the population. Mrs. Ho Non, a CPP MP, said that the issue raised by the civil society in biased because there were no clear proofs, She said that because people have needs, MPs must know about their constituents’ hardship, and that all it was amounted to promises made by MPs to their constituents only.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

WITNESS - Thai elections hinge on village ties, money and fear

December 18, 2007
By Dominic Whiting

PHANA, Thailand (Reuters) - Campaigners handed out leaflets, babies chewed them, a band twanged a folk song and 200 people waited to hear what Thailand's post-coup election would offer a village where cows and pigs live under stilted wooden houses.

Due on stage in the dusty clearing was my mother's cousin, a supporter of ousted Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and a candidate for the newly formed People's Power Party (PPP) in the parliamentary poll due Dec. 23.

His main rival from the Democrat Party would follow -- son of a former justice minister and good friend of my grandfather.

I came along to see what was on offer before I voted. On a coincidental visit to see my Thai mother and British father, I had discovered that as a Hong Kong resident I was eligible to vote a week in advance.

The first, fiery, speaker on stage advocated growing cassava for use as a bio-fuel to beat soaring petrol and diesel prices.

Then Chaisri Keela, the PPP candidate, told me he would draw tourists by publicising the local monkey forest and a 300-year-old temple, built by the hunters and monks who crossed the Mekong River from what is now Laos to establish the village.

As a former member of parliament for Thaksin's disbanded Thai Rak Thai (Thais love Thais) party, he would also continue its popular policies of giving cheap loans and health care to the rural poor -- ideas now adopted by rivals.

"We were first and people trust us to deliver," Chaisri said.

This Lao-speaking village in the rice-growing "emerald triangle" where Thailand, Laos and Cambodia meet is 650 km (400 miles) northeast of Bangkok.

It's a world away from the rivalry between the old-money aristocracy and a new, entrepreneurial elite that paralysed politics during Thaksin's rule and led to last year's bloodless army coup.

Here and across the countryside local characters, not national party policies, determine votes, proving that personal loyalties will dictate Thailand's future as it struggles to revive consumer confidence and investor interest.

SCARED

The PPP is expected to become the biggest party in the lower house, but analysts say it will fall short of a majority under a new constitution designed to prevent the kind of electoral dominance Thaksin enjoyed.

Other parties might try to form a coalition government excluding the PPP and its Thaksin loyalists. Some analysts fear violence or another coup if the poll fails to deliver stability.

Chaisri's campaign secretary told me he had been intimidated, told to pull over on a dark road by three men in army uniforms, with one pointing an M16 assault rifle in his face before hitting him on the neck with the gun.

"I'm scared. This isn't like any other election I've worked in," said Sombat Wantong, a 20-year veteran of local politics.

The army denied involvement, local media said at the time.

The military-installed government is warning people off accepting money for votes, fearing the hand of Thaksin, a billionaire tycoon who has stayed in the public eye with his purchase of English football club Manchester City.

Vote buying was a stubborn part of Thailand's patronage politics, said Democrat Party candidate Apiwat Ngeunmeun, who believes only education, not the PPP's "get rich quick" message, would solve long-term problems linked to low farm incomes.

No-one offered me money, though the going rate was apparently 300 baht ($9).

"I hope people don't buy votes, but it's not the U.S.," said Apiwat, 31, who studied business in Washington D.C. "People have to work so hard to get so little here. I'm not sure if in my lifetime things are going to change, but I'll try hard to do it."

My grandfather, a village headman who died a decade ago, had campaigned for Apiwat's father as the politician became a local hero by engineering the spin-off of the area into a new province -- at a stroke allowing more money to be funnelled into road construction and a new branch of a national university.

Brought up in Britain, I only received my Thai identity card five years ago and was thrilled to be exercising my democratic right for the first time at a pivotal time in Thailand's history.

When it came to the vote, with my poor reading of Thai, I marked the numbers my father had suggested -- after all, he was a resident who could be affected by any new policies.

Only later did he realise he'd given me the wrong numbers.

Saturday, July 21, 2007

SRP: Child Soldiers in Africa, Child Voters in Cambodia

21 July 2007
CHILD SOLDIERS IN AFRICA, CHILD VOTERS IN CAMBODIA

In Africa, tribal leaders further their war-aims by manipulating children to become soldiers. In Cambodia, the government took the first step towards enlisting children in becoming pawns to be manipulated by the ruling party at the polls ["People Now Eligible for National ID at Age 15," Cambodia Daily 20 July 2007].

The issuing of ID cards to adults over the past few years has been a highly politicized process. It was one of the main administrative tricks used by the authorities to artificially inflate the number of votes for the CPP and decrease the number of votes for the opposition.

Now that 900,000 Cambodian children have been authorized to receive a National ID card, we should expect this mass of young people to be the subjects of the newest version of election manipulation. At the outset, it is likely that cards will be selectively issued, so that the children of CPP supporters will easily receive a card while children of opponents will be denied them through administrative barriers. When the children then come of age, more CPP supporters will already have been registered.

It is also possible that the age listed on the ID card is increased by at least a year. In this case, 16 year olds could claim to be 17, thus making them eligible to vote in next year's National Assembly election.

We should also suspect that these young people will be the targets of bribes and other forms of manipulation on voting day. In 2007, many illegitimate voters, including people under 18, were bribed by CPP authorities to cast ballots using ghost names that are intentionally kept on voter list. This new crop of young people will be particularly vulnerable to this kind of bribery and manipulation next year.

In order to stem this flow of abuses, ID cards should be issued only to those young people who are 17 years of age – those who will legitimately be eligible to vote in next year's election.

SRP Members of Parliament

Monday, April 02, 2007

Sam Rainsy: Vote buying still remains

Cambodian opposition party leader Sam Rainsy speaks to the media after voting during local governing council elections in Phnom Penh April 1 ,2007. REUTERS/Chor Sokunthea

01 April 2007
By Sav Yuth
Radio Free Asia

Translated from Khmer by Socheata

Opposition leader Sam Rainsy said that threats and attempts to buy vote still prevail at a large scale.

Sam Rainsy made the above declaration after voting for the commune election at polling station No. 0181, in Sangkat Boeng Reang, Khan Daun Penh, Phnom Penh city, yesterday.

Sam Rainsy said: “Violence is not as severe as in previous years, but threats in various forms still remain, and the attempts to buy vote still prevail at a large scale. I trust the Cambodian people to make the proper judgment and decide their future according to their conscience, their understanding, and their thoughts, and that they will not rely on the small gifts and gimmicks given to them.”

Say Chhum, the CPP secretary-general, who is in line waiting to vote in front of the same polling station as Sam Rainsy did, declined to answer about the presence of Sam Rainsy and the latter’s comment. Say Chhum told RFA’s Sam Borin that the present commune election has been recognized by the national and international public opinion and of being much better than all previous ones.

Say Chhum said: “Since the preparation of the election, the national and international public opinion estimate that this election is conducted much better than all previous ones.”