IRREGULARITIES IN ELECTION MANAGEMENT RISK
DELEGITIMIZING APRIL COMMUNE ELECTIONS
DELEGITIMIZING APRIL COMMUNE ELECTIONS
In order for voting results to legitimately reflect the will of the electorate, the administration of all steps in the election process must be professional and impartial. The devil lies in the details. The SRP has obtained a copy of the voter lists in every commune in the country. After investigating the content of the lists, the SRP is concerned that the results of Cambodia’s 2007 commune election will not reflect the will of voters due to two broad problems:
I. Irregularities in the Final Voters Lists
II. Failures in Administering Voter Information Notices
Irregularities in the Final Voters Lists
New voter lists have been built for this election, modified versions of the 2005 lists. The SRP is aware of at least five types of irregularities in the content of the final voters lists created in 2006 for the April 2007 commune election:
Failures in Administering Voter Information Notices
Two serious failures in administering voter information notices have increased the opacity of the voting process to such an extent that some eligible voters will be prevented from casting their ballots.
First, the issuance of voter information notices, which should be free of discrimination, has been implemented in a flagrantly politicized manner. Notices (as well as verbal information, explanation and guidance) have been distributed selectively to CPP supporters, while non CPP supporters have not received anything.
Second, voter information as mentioned on the notice is often misleading for non CPP supporters. For instance, in Poipet, voters are being directed to the wrong polling stations. When they arrive to vote at their supposed polling station, their names will not be on the voter list for that station, and they will be turned away.
SRP General Secretariat
For more information, contact 012 831 040
I. Irregularities in the Final Voters Lists
II. Failures in Administering Voter Information Notices
Irregularities in the Final Voters Lists
New voter lists have been built for this election, modified versions of the 2005 lists. The SRP is aware of at least five types of irregularities in the content of the final voters lists created in 2006 for the April 2007 commune election:
- Some new voters (first-time voters and voters who have moved to a new commune) who registered in October, 2006 do not appear on the new lists. These new voters received a receipt upon registration – form 2022 – but their names cannot be found on the final lists for their commune of residence.
- Some citizens discovered mistakes in the 2005 voting lists (including spelling of name, address, gender or age) and followed the proper procedures to have these mistakes corrected. NEC has not implemented these citizen-initiated adjustments as evidenced by supporting documents.
- The names of some voters from the old lists who should have retained their eligibility for the upcoming election were deleted. Some of these voters are opposition candidates and party agents.
- In previous hearings, CECs and NEC agreed to remove from the lists the names of ineligible persons (e.g. Vietnamese non-citizens). Some of these names have wrongly re-appeared on the new lists.
- Some names on the old lists were shown to be ghost voters – they have never lived and have never been known to anybody living in the same commune. These names have not been removed from the new lists.
Failures in Administering Voter Information Notices
Two serious failures in administering voter information notices have increased the opacity of the voting process to such an extent that some eligible voters will be prevented from casting their ballots.
First, the issuance of voter information notices, which should be free of discrimination, has been implemented in a flagrantly politicized manner. Notices (as well as verbal information, explanation and guidance) have been distributed selectively to CPP supporters, while non CPP supporters have not received anything.
Second, voter information as mentioned on the notice is often misleading for non CPP supporters. For instance, in Poipet, voters are being directed to the wrong polling stations. When they arrive to vote at their supposed polling station, their names will not be on the voter list for that station, and they will be turned away.
SRP General Secretariat
For more information, contact 012 831 040
2 comments:
SRP needs to prove that those irregularities will materially affect the final income, and how?
SiS
How? Well, for a start, they can try
to take a lolly pop and shove it
up their asses.
Post a Comment