Monday, April 21, 2008

SRP asks the National Assembly to speed up important laws

20 April 2008
By Uk Sav Borey
Radio Free Asia

Translated from Khmer by Heng Soy

On 18 April, the Sam Rainsy Party asked the CPP party president to organize a plenary session of the National Assembly (NA) to discuss and ratify important laws, including the anti-corruption law, the peaceful demonstration law, and the amendment to the general election.

Eng Chhai Eang, SRP Secretary-general, said that this request was made because the National Assembly closed its door for several months, whereas Cambodia needs these important law: “We want a NA meeting … for important laws, such as the anti-corruption law, the right to demonstrate law. The NA is closed for several months, (but) it should ratify these laws (instead).”

In response to the SRP request, Cheam Yeap, a CPP MP and member of the CPP permanent committee, said that the anti-corruption law is still in the government hand, and it was not submitted to the NA for review yet since the law is lacking in many points and the government is still thinking about it.

Cheam Yeap said: “Therefore, we want legal goals in (conformance with) the new criminal law which is (still) in the government’s hand. We have to wait for the criminal law to come out so that the anti-corruption law can come out at the same time, just as it is prescribed in the law.”

Cheam Yeap added that, regarding the amendment to the election law, the government has decided to stay with the current law. He said that there were 2 amendments made already: once in 1998 and once in 2003, so the law is preserved for the NEC to work under the framework of this (current) law.

Regarding the peaceful anti-demonstration law, Cheam Yeap said: “Regarding demonstrations, nobody takes responsibility for them, such as the demonstration against the Thai embassy and Thai companies in Cambodia, the government had to pay back more than $50 million.”

Yang Kim Eng, director of the People Center for Development and Peace, said that the SRP is correct in requesting the CPP for the NA to hold its session to review these important laws which are much needed by the government. He said that the anti-corruption law was dragged along for many years, and it was not presented to the NA for review and adoption, meanwhile the general public fall victim to this corruption which is taking place.

Recently, an anti-corruption coalition of civil society organizations in Cambodia, regrouping about 40 organizations, plans to send, in May, a petition thumbprinted by almost 1 million people, to ask that the new government formed after the 2008 election to speed up the adoption of the anti-corruption law, because this law has been blocked for a decade long already.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Gentleman

Everyone knows how vital the Anti-corruption laws to cambodian society, even the motodups recorgnise that.

The government fail to satisfy the laws that would improve many social benefits, especially the government has had the very bad record of lingering with corruption.Global witness and Humant rights and international communities such as world Bank have the matters in their hands all along.

It is not logical and irrational that these laws have to be corresponded with civil and criminal laws. As long as NA still exists, laws will be produced according to the needs and their relevence. It is a scapegoat tagging all along for that incompetence.

It is rather funny that social groups had to petitioned for them.

Neang SA

Anonymous said...

Between the géorgie in 2003 and the Tien An Men 's square in 1989 in China,

everything seems to show that Cambodia moves towards the events of Tien An Men of 1989.

Anonymous said...

That is a shit load of crock. The Anti-Corruption law was submitted to the National Assembly, but instead of voting on it, they kicked it back to the government. Now they got nothing.

Anonymous said...

PS: in a way, this is like the Khmer Rouge trial. When you look for perfection, you might end up with zip.

Anonymous said...

Why the corruption law does not pass in the assembly , because it hurt personal's interest.They don't care about the country,their personal wealth are more impotant than anything else. Like the old saying; luy lek muoy,kduoy lek pi,party lek bey..

Anonymous said...

Are you saying that SRP means Self Reward People?