Op-Ed by Anonymous
COLLECTIVE ACTION
How to CAPITALIZE on the WE WANT CHANGE IN CAMBODIA objective during Prime Minister Hun Sen’s visit in New York City. A few lessons from the Martin Luther King, Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi.
“Be the change…” — Gandhi
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
We know TIMING (the visit of PM Hun Sen to NYC – this is your chance to put words and unleash your frustrations into action), FOCUS (stay on message, be succinct), REINFORCEMENT through COORDINATED EFFORTS (multi-layering, sequencing of coordinated action and different events for full maximum impact), MEDIA SAVVY-NESS… and definitely NON-VIOLENCE.
The Message:
* Use your social media network… many of you have FACEBOOK, forward and ask your friends to forward and impress their need to take a few minutes to take action. Provide only the BASIC information for action: what are the options, where/when/how…
* Invite your non-Cambodian friends to participate and turn the event into a fun outing with friends with cause. Moreover, remind them that their tax money in hundreds of millions of dollars is underwriting this autocratic, dictatorial regime of PM Hun Sen since 1991.
1. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Something is happening in Memphis [Cambodia]; something is happening in our world… The masses of people are rising up. And wherever they are assembled today, whether they are in Johannesburg, South Africa; Nairobi, Kenya; Accra, Ghana; New York City; Atlanta, Georgia; Jackson, Mississippi; or Memphis, Tennessee; [Phnom Penh, Cambodia] -- the cry is always the same: “We want to be free.”…
Survival demands that we grapple with them. Men, for years now, have been talking about war and peace. But now, no longer can they just talk about it. It is no longer a choice between violence and nonviolence in this world; it's nonviolence or nonexistence. That is where we are today…
And that's all this whole thing is about. We aren't engaged in any negative protest and in any negative arguments with anybody. We are saying that we are determined to be men [and women of dignity]. We are determined to be people. We are saying -- We are saying that we are God's children. And that we are God's children, we don't have to live like we are forced to live…
Now, what does all of this mean in this great period of history? It means that we've got to stay together. We've got to stay together and maintain unity…
Secondly, let us keep the issues where they are. The issue is injustice. The issue is the refusal of Memphis to be fair and honest in its dealings with its public servants, who happen to be sanitation workers. Now, we've got to keep attention on that…
Now we're going to march again, and we've got to march again, in order to put the issue where it is supposed to be -- and force everybody to see that there are thirteen hundred of God's children here suffering, sometimes going hungry, going through dark and dreary nights wondering how this thing is going to come out. That's the issue. And we've got to say to the nation: We know how it's coming out. For when people get caught up with that which is right and they are willing to sacrifice for it, there is no stopping point short of victory…
Now, let me say as I move to my conclusion that we've got to give ourselves to this struggle until the end. Nothing would be more tragic than to stop at this point in Memphis. We've got to see it through. And when we have our march, you need to be there. If it means leaving work, if it means leaving school -- be there. Be concerned about your brother. You may not be on strike. But either we go up together, or we go down together.
Let us develop a kind of dangerous unselfishness.
But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. And so, we've come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice…
We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of Now. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy…
It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment. This sweltering summer of the Negro [Cambodian oppressed]'s legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality…
We cannot walk alone.
And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead.
We cannot turn back.
There are those who are asking the devotees of civil [human] rights, "When will you be satisfied?" We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is [Cambodians are] the victim[s] of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the negro [Cambodian]'s basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto [gang of Chinese-backed communists] to a larger one [gang of Vietnamese-backed communists].
Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states. I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta [Long Beach] and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham [Phnom Penh]. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea…
You deplore the demonstrations taking place in Birmingham [Phnom Penh]. But your statement, I am sorry to say, fails to express a similar concern for the conditions that brought about the demonstrations. I am sure that none of you would want to rest content with the superficial kind of social analysis that deals merely with effects and does not grapple with underlying causes. It is unfortunate that demonstrations are taking place in Birmingham [Phnom Penh], but it is even more unfortunate that the city's white power [CPP-military-Oknha] structure left the Negro[Cambodian poor majority] community with no alternative.
In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct action. We have gone through all these steps in Birmingham. There can be no gainsaying the fact that racial injustice engulfs this community. Birmingham is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States. Its ugly record of brutality is widely known. Negroes [Cambodian opposition and human rights workers] have experienced grossly unjust treatment in the courts. There have been more unsolved bombings of Negro homes and churches in Birmingham than in any other city in the nation. These are the hard, brutal facts of the case. On the basis of these conditions, Negro leaders sought to negotiate with the city fathers. But the latter consistently refused to engage in good faith negotiation.
You may well ask: "Why direct action? Why sit ins, marches and so forth? Isn't negotiation a better path?" You are quite right in calling for negotiation. Indeed, this is the very purpose of direct action. Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored. My citing the creation of tension as part of the work of the nonviolent resister may sound rather shocking. But I must confess that I am not afraid of the word "tension." I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth. Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal, so must we see the need for nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood. The purpose of our direct action program is to create a situation so crisis packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation. I therefore concur with you in your call for negotiation. Too long has our beloved Southland [Cambodian homeland] been bogged down in a tragic effort to live in monologue rather than dialogue…
We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct action campaign that was "well timed" in the view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word "Wait!" It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This "Wait" has almost always meant "Never." We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that "justice too long delayed is justice denied."…
The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "an unjust law is no law at all."
Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust…
Sometimes a law is just on its face and unjust in its application…
Oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever. The yearning for freedom eventually manifests itself…
2. Mahatma Gandhi
Satyagraha (Sanskrit: सत्याग्रह satyāgraha), loosely translated as "Soul Force,"[1] "truth force," or "holding on to truth," is a philosophy and practice of nonviolent resistance developed and conceived by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (also known as "Mahatma" Gandhi). Gandhi deployed satyagraha in the Indian independence movement and also during his earlier struggles in South Africa…
Satyagraha is a synthesis of the Sanskrit words satya (meaning "truth") and Agraha ("insistence", or "holding firmly to"). For Gandhi, satyagraha went far beyond mere "passive resistance" and became strength in practising non-violent methods. In his words:
The Message:
- Defend the human rights of the Cambodian population from government abuses
- Steadfastly restore and guarantee the freedom of speech and freedom of expression
- Guarantee freedom for the protesters and human rights defenders
- Release all villagers jailed for protesting to defend their farm land
- Withdraw the arrest warrant for MP Sam Rainsy
- Restore immunity for MP Sam Rainsy
* Use your social media network… many of you have FACEBOOK, forward and ask your friends to forward and impress their need to take a few minutes to take action. Provide only the BASIC information for action: what are the options, where/when/how…
* Invite your non-Cambodian friends to participate and turn the event into a fun outing with friends with cause. Moreover, remind them that their tax money in hundreds of millions of dollars is underwriting this autocratic, dictatorial regime of PM Hun Sen since 1991.
1. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Excerpts from “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop”
Something is happening in Memphis [Cambodia]; something is happening in our world… The masses of people are rising up. And wherever they are assembled today, whether they are in Johannesburg, South Africa; Nairobi, Kenya; Accra, Ghana; New York City; Atlanta, Georgia; Jackson, Mississippi; or Memphis, Tennessee; [Phnom Penh, Cambodia] -- the cry is always the same: “We want to be free.”…
Survival demands that we grapple with them. Men, for years now, have been talking about war and peace. But now, no longer can they just talk about it. It is no longer a choice between violence and nonviolence in this world; it's nonviolence or nonexistence. That is where we are today…
And that's all this whole thing is about. We aren't engaged in any negative protest and in any negative arguments with anybody. We are saying that we are determined to be men [and women of dignity]. We are determined to be people. We are saying -- We are saying that we are God's children. And that we are God's children, we don't have to live like we are forced to live…
Now, what does all of this mean in this great period of history? It means that we've got to stay together. We've got to stay together and maintain unity…
Secondly, let us keep the issues where they are. The issue is injustice. The issue is the refusal of Memphis to be fair and honest in its dealings with its public servants, who happen to be sanitation workers. Now, we've got to keep attention on that…
Now we're going to march again, and we've got to march again, in order to put the issue where it is supposed to be -- and force everybody to see that there are thirteen hundred of God's children here suffering, sometimes going hungry, going through dark and dreary nights wondering how this thing is going to come out. That's the issue. And we've got to say to the nation: We know how it's coming out. For when people get caught up with that which is right and they are willing to sacrifice for it, there is no stopping point short of victory…
Now, let me say as I move to my conclusion that we've got to give ourselves to this struggle until the end. Nothing would be more tragic than to stop at this point in Memphis. We've got to see it through. And when we have our march, you need to be there. If it means leaving work, if it means leaving school -- be there. Be concerned about your brother. You may not be on strike. But either we go up together, or we go down together.
Let us develop a kind of dangerous unselfishness.
Excerpts from “I have a Dream”
But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. And so, we've come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice…
We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of Now. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy…
It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment. This sweltering summer of the Negro [Cambodian oppressed]'s legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality…
We cannot walk alone.
And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead.
We cannot turn back.
There are those who are asking the devotees of civil [human] rights, "When will you be satisfied?" We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is [Cambodians are] the victim[s] of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the negro [Cambodian]'s basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto [gang of Chinese-backed communists] to a larger one [gang of Vietnamese-backed communists].
Excerpts from “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”
Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states. I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta [Long Beach] and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham [Phnom Penh]. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea…
You deplore the demonstrations taking place in Birmingham [Phnom Penh]. But your statement, I am sorry to say, fails to express a similar concern for the conditions that brought about the demonstrations. I am sure that none of you would want to rest content with the superficial kind of social analysis that deals merely with effects and does not grapple with underlying causes. It is unfortunate that demonstrations are taking place in Birmingham [Phnom Penh], but it is even more unfortunate that the city's white power [CPP-military-Oknha] structure left the Negro[Cambodian poor majority] community with no alternative.
In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct action. We have gone through all these steps in Birmingham. There can be no gainsaying the fact that racial injustice engulfs this community. Birmingham is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States. Its ugly record of brutality is widely known. Negroes [Cambodian opposition and human rights workers] have experienced grossly unjust treatment in the courts. There have been more unsolved bombings of Negro homes and churches in Birmingham than in any other city in the nation. These are the hard, brutal facts of the case. On the basis of these conditions, Negro leaders sought to negotiate with the city fathers. But the latter consistently refused to engage in good faith negotiation.
You may well ask: "Why direct action? Why sit ins, marches and so forth? Isn't negotiation a better path?" You are quite right in calling for negotiation. Indeed, this is the very purpose of direct action. Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored. My citing the creation of tension as part of the work of the nonviolent resister may sound rather shocking. But I must confess that I am not afraid of the word "tension." I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth. Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal, so must we see the need for nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood. The purpose of our direct action program is to create a situation so crisis packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation. I therefore concur with you in your call for negotiation. Too long has our beloved Southland [Cambodian homeland] been bogged down in a tragic effort to live in monologue rather than dialogue…
We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct action campaign that was "well timed" in the view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word "Wait!" It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This "Wait" has almost always meant "Never." We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that "justice too long delayed is justice denied."…
The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "an unjust law is no law at all."
Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust…
Sometimes a law is just on its face and unjust in its application…
Oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever. The yearning for freedom eventually manifests itself…
2. Mahatma Gandhi
Excerpts from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satyagraha
Satyagraha (Sanskrit: सत्याग्रह satyāgraha), loosely translated as "Soul Force,"[1] "truth force," or "holding on to truth," is a philosophy and practice of nonviolent resistance developed and conceived by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (also known as "Mahatma" Gandhi). Gandhi deployed satyagraha in the Indian independence movement and also during his earlier struggles in South Africa…
Satyagraha is a synthesis of the Sanskrit words satya (meaning "truth") and Agraha ("insistence", or "holding firmly to"). For Gandhi, satyagraha went far beyond mere "passive resistance" and became strength in practising non-violent methods. In his words:
Truth (satya) implies love, and firmness (agraha) engenders and therefore serves as a synonym for force. I thus began to call the Indian movement Satyagraha, that is to say, the Force which is born of Truth and Love or non-violence, and gave up the use of the phrase “passive resistance”, in connection with it, so much so that even in English writing we often avoided it and used instead the word “satyagraha”....[5]In a letter to P.K.Rao, Servants of India Society dated September 10, 1935, quoted in Louis Fischer's, The Life of Mahatma Gandhi, Part I, Chapter 11, pp. 87–88, Gandhi disputes that his idea of Civil Disobedience was adapted from the writings of Thoreau.
"The statement that I had derived my idea of Civil Disobedience phrase to explain our struggle to the English readers. But I found that even "Civil disobedience" failed to convey the full meaning of the struggle. I therefore adopted the phrase "Civil Resistance."Gandhi described it as follows:
I have also called it love-force or soul-force. In the application of satyagraha, I discovered in the earliest stages that pursuit of truth did not admit of violence being inflicted on one’s opponent but that he must be weaned from error by patience and compassion. For what appears to be truth to the one may appear to be error to the other. And patience means self-suffering. So the doctrine came to mean vindication of truth, not by infliction of suffering on the opponent, but on oneself.[6]
35 comments:
Beautiful! Let us give the dictators of the world, beginning with the dictator in Cambodia, a run for their money... Let us unite our SOUL-FORCE to confront their cowardly brute force.
DICTATORS ARE WIMPS! DICTATORS ARE WIMPS! DICTATORS ARE WIMPS!
WIMPS ARE LOSERS!
LOSERS ARE CRY-BABIES!
CRY-BABIES ARE CHEATERS!
CHEATERS OF ELECTIONS!
CHEATERS OF LIFE!
AND CHEATERS NEVER WIN!
I will sign right now!
kangaroo court decision in an animal kingdom!
I'm not pro Hun Sen but I will not support someone claim to be the leader but yet tucked his tail and ran like a dog everytime he is threatened, and please do not compare Sam Rainsy to Dr. LutherKing or Ghandi cause they did not run and left their supporters hanged. They walked with their supporters and sacrified their lives for what they fought for, which was Freedom.
Interpol police must arrest criminal Hun Sen now.
11:48am reply if you die under Hun Sen hand you have no justice and if you stay in Cambodia you will be Hun Sen prison for lifetime liked Heng Pov, Hun Sen retrials him again and again for nothing and no justice or fair trial for his innocent.
11:48 PM, if you don't leave Cambodia, your mother, your father, your children, your grand-children will live with dictator for ever
Why would Hun Sen need to kill Sam Rainsy? Every time, he just yells and Sam Rainsy runs like hell breaks lose! Hun Sen must be laughing like crazy at home.
Oh man, some opposition supporters still believe they can win with their leader running aways like that.
It's about time to replace Sam Rainsy. The guy is coward and clueless. Even Mu Sochua is braver than him. She stand her ground and he is not afraid to go to jail, and now see that the government dare not do anything to her. SR have a lot to learn from Mu Sochua. I think we should appoint Mu Sochua to be SRP leader now and change the party name back to its old name the Nationalist Party.
Let SR stay in France and work his profession as a banker. May be he will be more happy and make a living that way.
LOL...for what?
12:12am nobody can win an election with Hun Sen because he has 7 million Vietnamese voters behind him, the only worst thing is Hun Sen will not allow any Khmer people to fight to reclaim their lost land from Vietnamese encroachment and 7 million Vietnamese people living in Cambodia has more power than Khmer people. What is your point by fighting your own Khmer people?
from Khmer Empire to countryless under Hun Sen is not acceptable all Khmer people must stand up and fight to save Cambodia from the Vietnamese expansion.
To Khmer Rouge supporter
Khmer in Sydney CBD
Why are you support the Democratic Kampuchea Pol Pot Khmer Rouge Regime kills 1.7 million innocent Khmer peoples?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime kills hundreds of innocent Khmer peoples?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime extrajudicial execution over 100 members of FUNCINPEC Party?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime murders over 80 members of Sam Rainsy Party?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime murders 3 leaders of the Free Trade Union?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime murders 10 Journalists?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime kills at least 18 innocent Khmer peoples during a grenades attack (terrorism) on March 30, 1997 in Phnom Penh, Cambodia?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime police brutality against monks and evictees?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime burn poor people's house(s) down to the ground and leave them homeless?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime torture innocent Khmer peoples?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime human rights abuses innocent Khmer peoples?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime sex with children in Cambodia?
Khmer in Sydney CBD, do you like to sleep with children?
The reason why I'm asking is because you gay guys support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime who is continue to keep child sex industry open.
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime committed corruptions in Cambodia?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime signed away our territories to Vietnam; Koh Tral, almost half of our ocean territory and oil fields?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime illegal arrest, mass evictions, land grabbing, firearms, logging, deforestation, sold state properties, removed parliamentary immunity of parliament members and plunder national resources?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime abuse the laws, the National Election Committee and the National Assembly?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime violate the laws, the Constitution and the Paris Accords?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime oppress, injustice, impunity, persecute, unlawful detention and death in custody?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime steal votes, bring foreigners from Vietnam to vote in Cambodia for Cambodian People's Party, use dead people's names to vote for Cambodian People's Party and disqualified potential Sam Rainsy Party's voters?
Why are you support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime abuse the court as a tools to send political opponents, journalists, land owners and farmers to jail?
You're support the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime who is responsible for killing almost two million innocent Khmer peoples and counting.
Please do me a favor, don't ever tell anyone that you are Khmer because you make Khmer peoples look bad.
Countryless only for brainwashed Khmer oversea. Over 10 millions Cambodian living in Cambodia they are owner and proud of their country and nationality.
I will sign that Sam Rainsy must respect a court decision. Because as MP, he must show exemplaire.
1:19am must be CPP member or Hun Sen supporter why don't you reform CPP judicial systems to protect Khmer people instead of helping the Vietnamese.
Corrupt authority, whether it be an abusive spouse or a dictator, employs secrecy to hide it’s true activities. Otherwise the subjects would have the wool pulled back from their eyes and see the authority unclothed.
Corrupt authority is understandably paranoid and threatened by the subjects it maintains control over and harvests wealth from. Corrupt authority tells nothing about itself and seeks to secretly know everything about the individual in name of “national security.” A constant state of war is necessary, and is produced to divert attention away from the true cause and to justify a police state of affairs. The cost of maintaining a police state is enormous, just ask the Ancient Romans if you could. More and more of the economy is always devoted to servicing the growing military/police state, but it cannot be sustained.
The end can turn out in different ways. Often the criminals behind the proverbial curtain will loot the treasury and escape, leaving the country burn. Or, a slow death in which the corruption saps perception of credibility from all authority, and authority is nothing without credibility. It is the people who give authority in the first place. The purpose of non-violent protests is to demonstrate this. However non-violent protests are generally isolated and for a finite time. In the end, people en-mass will walk away from the system itself, permanently, leaving it defenseless.
When a nation operates without a Supreme Ruler over them this is what the people get in rejecting there is a God who rules over all.
I'm not glorying in the fact that people suffer under such rulership but when man is in control of his own destiny, this is right in his own eye. It may be wrong in your own eye, but is right in his.
So who's truth are we basing our "rights" on without factoring the rights of our Creator into our daily affair of life?
Vietnam believes that it is their right to take over other sovereign country through strength or subtilest.
Bless is the nation who God is the LORD.
People, without a God you would not have freedom to breath his very breath of life. Because of his goodness today you live. Not by your own will but the will
of him who Created all things for his own pleasure. He causes rain to fall on the fields of the just and unjust-that is his goodness.
Hun Sen may be the most corrupted PM in Cambodia history but that is the justice of God as he see fits to let him walk in his own ways and will. But his Creator will judge him whether in this life or the life to come for all his crimes that he has committed. Sure, God would love it if he has a heart of a servant and not a heart of a tyrant.
God only works in a nation as the people will allow him. The more the people yield to him the more he will bless that nation. He rather bless then curse but only what the people will dictate for him to do: Obedience=Blessing, Disobedience=Cursing. This is Universal law of our Creator has put in place since the beginning of his creation.
Heng Pov will be appeared to be a witness for Sam Rainsy..
ពួកអាបល់បាយគណៈបក្សសម រង្សី និងគណៈបក្ស
គឹម សុខា រួមទាំង អាសួន សេរីរដ្ឋា
បានតែព្រុសនៅក្រៅប្រទេសតែប៉ុណ្ណោះ... ពួកអាចោលម្សៀតអស់នេះវាគ្មានសេចក្ដីក្លាហាន
និងនាំគ្នាធ្វើបាតុកម្ម ឬ មហាបាតុកម្មនៅចំពោះមុខ
សមេ្តចអគ្គមហាសេនាបតីតេជោ ហ៊ុន សែន ស្អីទេវាបានតែដើរញុះញង់ បោកប្រាស់អ្នក
ទាំងអស់គ្នាតែប៉ុណ្ណោះ... !!!
ជ័យយោ រជ្ជកាលទី៤នៃសមេ្តចអគ្គមហាសេនាបតីតេជោ
ហ៊ុន សែន វរ្ម័នទី១!
បរាជ័យ! ពួកអាក្បត់ជាតិ!
នែ! អាចង្រៃ 2:12 AM!
បើសិនជាឯងមានគតិហើយចេះគិតនោះអញច្បាស់ជាគោរពឯងហើយ។ ប៉ុន្តែឯងហ្នឺងល្ងង៉ណាស់!
បើសិនជាមេដឺកនាំឯងកុំប្រើកម្លាំងប្រដាប់អាវុធមក
គំរាមគេឯងម្លោះពួកស្នេហាជាតិទាំងនោះនឺងធ្វើក្នុងសុ្រកហើយ។ តើឯងស្មានតែគេខ្លាចអាមេដឺកនាំ
ក្បត់ជាតិនឺងឬ?
យើងសួមប្រាប់ឯងឲ្យដឺងសួមឯងកុំប្រើព្រៈនាមអតី
តវរក្សត្រ(ជ័យ វរ្ម័នទី៧!)ម្ដងទៀតឲ្យ! នេះបានន័យថាឯងមើលងាយព្រៈជេស្ដាព្រៈអង្គ។
ឯងនឺងមេដឺកនាំឯងជាពួកអាចោលម្សៀតទាំងអស់ព្រោះគ្មានសេចក្ដីស្នេហាយុត្តិធម៌មកលើប្រជារាស្រ្ត
ស្លួតត្រង់គ្នាឯងបន្តិចសោះ។ លោកសម រង្សីជា
មនុស្សស្នេហាប្រទេសជាតិបែជាឯងនិងពួកអាក្បត់
ជាតិនិងប្រជារាស្រ្តឯងថ្កោលទោសលោកទៅវិញ?
គួរឲ្យអស់សំណើចណាស់!!!!!!!!!
ពីខ្ញុំ
វើន ចំរាន់
ភ្នំពេញ
11:48
You and your whole family who support Hun Xen's dictatorship go suck Hun Xen's dick now.
មិនមែនទេ!!! អាចុយម៉្រាយខ្ញុំកញ្ជះដាច់ថ្លៃយួន
២:១២AM ឯងទេដែលជាពួកអាក្បត់ជាតិនោះ!!!
អា ២:១២AM ឯង នឹងត្រូវខ្មែរអ្នកស្នេហាជាតិ
សំឡាប់អោយផុតពូជមឹនខាន៕
There are plenty of true patriotic Khmer in sleeping cell around you, so watch out! It's just a matter of time! believe me អាចុយម៉្រាយខ្ញុំកញ្ជះដាច់ថ្លៃយួន ២:១២AM!!!
The poll will come in 2013 soon,Hun Sen will cheat to win,threat Khmer people to vote,bribe them some food or clothes,and specially seven million Vietnamese illegal immigrants will vote for Hun Sen.Dare to protest and dare to die against him.
2:12am
ប្រសិនបើអ្នកនិយាយត្រូវ ពួកគេទាំងឡាយ
មិនជេម៉្រាយរបស់អ្នកនោះទេ ថ្ងៃក្រោយមុននឹង
អ្នកនិយាយសូមគិតឲ្យបានច្បាស់ ហើយខ្ញំជឿ
ថាអ្នកក៍មិនមែនជាក្មេងអាយុក្រោម១០ឆ្នាំ
នោះដែរ។
ភ្នំដិន តាកែវ
Ah kawck gine people justice and real democracy! You motherfucker do not see wahat hapened to Shehato and Sadam Husen 's families????
Who killed 1.7 million innocent Khmer peoples?
a) Pol Pot
b) Nuon Chea
c) Ta Mok
d) Khieu Samphan
e) Son Sen
f) Kaing Guek Eav aka Samak Mith Duch
g) Ieng Sary
h) Ieng Thearith
i) Chea Sim
j) Heng Samrin
k) Hor Namhong aka Samak Mith Yaem
l) Keat Chhon
m) Ouk Bunchhoeun
n) Sim Ka aka Samak Mith Muth
o) Hun Sen...
p) all of above
Source:
DC-CAM
Document Center of Cambodia
On October 7, 2009 Chea Sim, Heng Samrin, Hor Namhong, Keat Chhon, Ouk Bunchhoeun and Sim Ka has been summoned by the UN backed Khmer Rouge Tribunal court (ECCC).
Which one of these Khmer Rouge(s) list below is the current Khmer Rouge Regime's leader?
a) Pol Pot
b) Nuon Chea
c) Ta Mok
d) Khieu Samphan
e) Son Sen
f) Kaing Guek Eav aka Samak Mith Duch
g) Ieng Sary
h) Ieng Thearith
i) Chea Sim
j) Heng Samrin
k) Hor Namhong aka Samak Mith Yaem
l) Keat Chhon
m) Ouk Bunchhoeun
n) Sim Ka aka Samak Mith Muth
o) Hun Sen
Fact:
Pol Pot is a Khmer Rouge leader of the Democratic Kampuchea Khmer Rouge Regime.
Hun Sen was a Khmer Rouge commander of the Democratic Kampuchea Khmer Rouge Regime and now, a Khmer Rouge leader of the Cambodian People's Party Khmer Rouge Regime.
Who killed Chea Vichea?
a) Hun Sen's Death Squad
b) Hok Lundy
c) Huy Piseth
d) Phan Sary
e) Oum Chamnane
f) Bon Na
g) Keov Vichet
beside country like usa or european countries. some country like cambodia, china, viet, birma, even thailand need a strong man to govern the country. just look at example of irak today, without sadam hunsen the country is getting worst than ever. it would exactly happen in cambodia without a strong man like hunsen. after all hunsen it less evil khmer rouge regime. it still a long way to go to establish democracy in cambodia, and won't change in the next day once hunsen is no longer in power. it would be a bloody in the street again without hunsen. for these reasons usa support hunsen's regime, like it not. if sam rainsy is a real leader, he should and must be face to khmer's justice of injustice like one of a birma leader, to spend a jail time and show to the world the unfair khmer's justice. but instead he cheatchat all over the world, pretending he's fighing for human right in cambodia. what 's kind of activist is he? or just a scary chicken affraid to chop off it head.
12:18pm,
I think you are correct that Cambodia needs a strong man right now to maintain stability. Without a strong man there will be blood spilled very often, even if Sam Rainsy is in charge.
In general Cambodian people have yet to learn to dialogue in a civilized manner without resort to violence.
These yuon slave cambodian are useless for Cambodian people.
Tith Sothea--- the mouthpiece of the Press and Quick Reaction Unit (PQRU) of the Council of Ministers working for CPP---ASSUMING….they also has a “QUICK REACTION UNIT” crew for online. DOES THE CPP also have a “FACE TO FACE - QUICK REACTION UNIT” OVERSEA?
BARKING FROM CAMBODIA? BARKING ONLINE? HOW MUCH THEY PAID YOU PEOPLE?
LOL
Long Live Mr. Tith Sothea without your kind of effort for all helpless people there will be no Law suit against da Xen Hun today...
Jay-yo!! Jay - Yo!!! We are behind you all the ways!!!
Sam Rainsy must take Hun Sen to court; Failure to prosecute Hun Sen will result in more innocent Khmer peoples being murder.
Sam Rainsy must not give Hun Sen another option to pick to escape justice.
Which one is better?
1. Hun Sen Death Squad (The Cambodian Organize Crime) go to federal prison for life in the United States for terrorism on March 30, 1997 in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
2. Sam Rainsy get his jail terms drop.
Option 1 will benefit all innocent Khmer peoples and Khmer national.
Option 2 will benefit Sam Rainsy and the Cambodia People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime (Hun Sen Death Squad, assassins, murderers, killers, human rights abusers and land grabbers...).
The last time, Sam Rainsy picked was option 2.
I remember Sam Rainsy said "I'm not doing this for Sam Rainsy, I'm doing this for Khmer national."
Sam Rainsy, please do a favor for the Khmer national, take Hun Sen to court.
I am hopping that Sam Rainsy pick the right option this time so that the same thing will not happen again ever.
Sam Rainsy must not allow Hun Sen to continue to kill more innocent Khmer peoples.
Sam Rainsy is in a position to take Hun Sen to court because Hun Sen was trying to assassinate him on March 30, 1997 Grenade Attack (Terrorism). This is a rare opportunity. Only victims have the power. I wise, I have this power to bring Hun Sen to federal court in the United States.
This is a million times better than spend hundreds of million of dollars to hire a private military contractor (Black Water, now XE etc...) to bring justice to criminals (Hun Sen Death Squad and the Khmer Rouge Regimes) who is responsible for killing almost two million innocent Khmer peoples and counting.
Who ever charge, prosecute, convict and sentence Hun Sen is a Khmer hero. You will be saving a lot of innocent Khmer peoples life. Because Hun Sen is responsible for murders his political opponents, leaders of the free trade union, journalists and innocent Khmer peoples.
Hun Sen is the most powerful person in Cambodia.
Sam Rainsy have the power to send the most powerful person in Cambodia (Hun Sen) to federal prison for life in the United States.
By
Victim of
Democratic Kampuchea Pol Pot Khmer Rouge Regime
&
Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime
Post a Comment