Showing posts with label Ros Chantraboth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ros Chantraboth. Show all posts

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Ros Chantraboth: “The US should not put Cambodia under its absolute influence” [-It’s OK to be under absolute Yuon influence then?]

Ros Chantraboth also wrote the biography of Sdach Korn, allegedly to butter up Hun Xen's prowess in Cambodia (Photo: Kuoch Kunthara, RFI)

23 July 2010
By Kuoch Kunthara
Radio France Internationale
Translated from Khmer by Heng Soy


In response to questions asked by RFI’s Kuoch Kunthara, Prof. Ros Chantraboth, an academician who advises the Cambodian academy and a professor of political science, explained and commented about the 60-year-old diplomatic relations between Cambodia and the US – a relationship that is both sweet and bitter. Ros Chantraboth believes that the US should not place Cambodia under its absolute influence and it should not lay the political path for Cambodia to follow either.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Unconditional nomination of Hun Xen and Xok An to the Royal Cambodian Academy ... which was created by Hun Xen

Hun Xen (R) and Xok An (L) are the two new members of the Royal Cambodian Academy which, coincidentally, was set up by Hun Xen himself. Hun Xen's talent is displayed by his poem writing whereas Xok An is a well known expert in cock-fighting.

Poem written by Academician Hun Xen sent to his lover, Ms. Piseth Pilika, who was later gunned down. Heng Pov revealed that the person who commissioned the killing of Piseth Pilika was no other than Mrs. Bun Rany Hun Xen, the famous wife of Academician Hun Xen (Poem posted at: pisethpilika.free.fr)

21 April 2010
By Nhim Sophal
Cambodge Soir Hebdo
Translated from French by Sen Os Somneuch
Click here to read the article in French


Hun Xen and vice-PM Xok An have just been nominated as members of the Royal Cambodian Academy

The royal decree to the effect was also issued, but the ceremony will only take place next week. It is now official: the two leaders are now full members of the famous academy. 16 individuals, including 4 Cambodians living overseas, are part of this prestigious institution.

Created in 199 by a sub-decree issued by Hun Xen who is also its honorary president, the Royal Academy is still administered by the Council of Ministers. At the beginning, there was no preset condition to become a member. Graduated individuals who provide academic documents and work are often accepted as its members. Under this stipulation, Hun Xen – who penned several poems and research works in politics, as well as giving out important speeches – and Xok An were both admitted to the prestigious institution.

However, in the future, candidates must fulfill new conditions in order to become provisory members. They must earn a Ph.D. degree after spending 5 years of academic work and they must be elected the full members. The maximum number of members is limited to 60 and only 2 persons can be selected for each year.

“To be elected, one must undertake scientific research without plagiarizing others. We must have new [rules], but for now, it is not easy to follow all the rules,” Ros Chantraboth, an advisor and full member of the academy, admitted.

For the past 10 years, this institution has been criticized for not undertaking any valid research. From now on, it hopes to play the role of a memory bank for the government and the society.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Official Explains Temple Negotiations

Ros Chantrabot, Deputy Director of Royal Academy of Cambodia.

By Sok Khemara, VOA Khmer
Washington
13 February 2009

"The government has not brought the question to the International Court at the Hague because that court has jurisdiction only over an earlier ruling on the temple itself, not the land nearby, Ros Chantraboth said." [KI-Media note: How can Ros Chantraboth be so confident on this issue?]
Recent border talks between Cambodia and Thailand failed in part because Thai negotiators insisted on using a different name for Preah Vihear temple, an obstacle meant to delay the process, a researcher claimed Thursday.

“The government clearly understands that we can’t change the name, as by law and documents from the past we use only Preah Vihear, even on the Unesco [World Heritage] list,” said the researcher, Ros Chantraboth, vice chairman of the Royal Academy of Cambodia.

In negotiations earlier this month, the Thai side of a joint border committee wanted to call the Cambodian World Heritage site “the Temple of Phra Viharn-Preah Vihear,” a move that hampered talks, the Bangkok Post reported.

“We do not want that to become an excuse in the future,” Ros Chantraboth said, as a guest on “Hello VOA.”

Cambodia and Thailand remain at odds over a small strip of land near Preah Vihear temple, with troops have been amassed on both sides of the border since July. Several rounds of bilateral talks have failed to resolve the conflict, which has led to the deaths of at least three Cambodian and one Thai soldier.

The government has not brought the question to the International Court at the Hague because that court has jurisdiction only over an earlier ruling on the temple itself, not the land nearby, Ros Chantraboth said.

Meanwhile, domestic political unrest in Thailand has made further negotiation hard, because the Cambodians don’t know with whom to negotiate, the new government, the opposition, or the military, he said.

Patience was important, he said, in order to maintain peace and stability in the region.

Saturday, December 27, 2008

A great Khmer historian will publish a book on the history of Preah Vihear temple

The spectacular aerial view of Preah Vihear temple with the bird's eye view of Cambodia to the left.

Kampuchea Thmey newspaper
25th December, 2008
Translated from Khmer by Khmerization

A commentary book about the history of Preah Vihear from the time of its construction to the present time, including the Thai invasion, will be published soon. The book was written by an academic working at the Royal Cambodian Academy.

Dr. Ros Chantrabot, the author of the book and vice-rector of the Royal Cambodian Academy, told Kampuchea Thmey that he plans to publish a book titled “Prasat Preah Vihear” (Preah Vihear Temple), which is a book on the history of Preah Vihear from the time of its construction until the present time.

He said that the book will be divided into three chapters. The first chapter will be about the history, the builder-kings, the stone inscriptions and the architectures. Chapter two will be about the court case in the International Court of Justice (1962) in The Hague which Cambodia won. The third chapter will be about the inscription of Preah Vihear temple in the world heritage list, including detailing about the Thai opposition of the inscription. It also details about the Thai invasion, starting on the 15th of July, 2008 onward.

Dr. Chatrabot said that the delay in the publication of the book is because he wants to wait to see if the present disputes with Thailand will change cause.

Dr. Chantrabot said that the book will be put to the government (Council of Ministers) for checking before publication. He said that this is because up until now there is no French historian has published any books on the history on Preah Vihear temple, only books about tourism guide that have been published.

Dr. Chatrabot said that the book has been personally researched and written by himself. The book will be 300 pages thick and 5000 copies will published in the first edition.

Mr. Phay Siphan, spokesman for the Council of Ministers, cannot be contacted for comments, but Dr. Chantrabot said that the publication of the book does not need government’s permission because it is the works of his personal research.

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Thailand won’t allow Cambodia to build roads leading to Preah Vihear temple

Everyday.com
19th November, 2008
Translated from Khmer by Khmerization

Mr. Ros Chantraboth, vice-president of the Royal Cambodian Academy, said in a seminar in Phnom Penh on Tuesday that the Veal Entry area is located inside Khmer territory and is an important route to Preah Vihear temple, so he thinks that Thailand will not easily allow Cambodia to build roads along this stretch of lands to connect to Preah Vihear temple. He said that Thailand will use all pretexts to cause disputes with Cambodia in order to obstruct the construction of this important route.

Mr. Ros said that the reasons of his claims were based on his observations that since Thailand sent its troops to occupy the Khmer territories Thailand has always claimed that the Veal Entry areas belong to Thailand. He added that, in every negotiation, Thailand has never abided by the agreements.

Regarding the maps, Mr Ros said that Cambodia has consistently used only one map, and that is the internationally-recognised map, which Thailand has also recognised and which was a map that Cambodia has used successfully in the 19962 court case which seen the return of the Preah Vihear temple to Cambodia.

He added that, the problem in the negotiation is that Thailand has used a map unilaterally drawn by Thailand for the negotiations.

He added that, in hindsight, Cambodia was under the influence or the pressures of the Cold War because Thailand has allied itself with the South East Asian Treaty Organisation (SEATO) led by America. Cambodia was not aligned and was neutral and Thailand has used American influence to produce new maps which has caused the problems in the Preah Vihear areas until today.//

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Concerns over a Thai company filming the life of King Jayavarman VII

15 December 2007
By Kim Pov Sottan
Radio Free Asia

Translated from Khmer by KI-Media

On Thursday afternoon, the committee for the preservation of Khmer civilization (CPKC) expressed its concerns about an attempt by a group of Thai researchers to film a documentary about the life of King Jayavarman VII who turned Cambodia into an empire.

Moeung Son, a representative of CPKC, said that King Jayavarman VII was a Cambodian Hero-King who ruled the (Khmer) empire and brought in development in all fields. He is concerned that there would be a falsification of history in the attempt to produce the documentary by Thailand.

Moeung Son said: “If they are (filming this documentary), we are certain that they will falsify history to serve their interests instead. I want the prime minister who is currently (financing) to film the Sdach Korn movie, to film the story of King Jayavarman VII instead.”

The reaction of Moeung Son came after a group of Thai researchers, including Chharon Vadanasin, came to visit Cambodian royal academicians last August to ask for cooperation in providing them with certain documents in the Thai plan to film this documentary.

Ros Chantrabot (who was financed by Hun Sen to rewrite the story of Sdach Korn), the vice-president of the Cambodian Royal Academy, indicated that during the 2-hour meeting with the Thai side, the Thai sweet talked about the relationships between the two countries, nevertheless, he rejected the cooperation. He said that, up until now, he is still concerned about this Thai attempt, because, if the Thai films the documentary, then distributes the film all over the world, and only then that Cambodia will issue its diplomatic reactions, it would be too late already. This is the reason why Ros Chatrabot is making additional pleas on this issue.

Ros Chantrabot said: “Please think, especially, (Khmer) film producers or those who love the Khmer culture, please pay attention (to this issue), and produce a film (about King Jayavarman VII) that bears the international standard. I am confident that if this is undertaken, we will not lose, it will also become a pride for our nation as well. At that time, I will cooperate (with such Cambodian film producer) and I will provide all the documents, and I will provide full help.”

An official from the ministry of culture unofficially said that the Thai film producers plan to film in Siem Reap, but that up to now, the ministry does not know about the progress of this Thai group.

Him Chhem, the secretary of state from the ministry of culture indicated that he does not know about this issue, and his ministry did not provide any authorization to produce such film either.

It should be reminded that, in 2003, the Thai embassy on Phnom Penh was torched down by several thousands of angry Cambodians following a report printed in a Cambodian newspaper indicating that Thai actress Suwanan Kongying, called Phkay Proeuk (Morning Star), said on Thai TV that Angkor Wat belongs to Thailand.

Sunday, September 30, 2007

Hun Sen-Sponsored 'Preah Sdach Korn' Book Needs 2d Edition To Meet Demand

25 Sep 07
By Bo Proeuk
Rasmei Kampuchea

Translated from Khmer and posted online

A book based on a period in the Cambodian history entitled "Preah Sdach Korn" [the August King Korn] written by Doctor of Political Science Professor Ros Chantrabotr, deputy president of the Royal Academy of Cambodia, was published for the second time with exclusive right by Angkor Publishing House, which is one of Cambodia's biggest publishers behind many famous books.

A responsible of Angkor Publishing House told Reaksmei Kampuchea on 24 September that the Preah Sdach Korn second edition was necessary when the first edition could not satisfy the large demand of the readers, students, and researchers of Cambodian history. This officer in charge of Angkor Publishing House went on to say that the second edition contains no alterations or additions to the content of the original version. The difference from the previous edition is in the cover paper that is not hard to lower the cost so that all strata of people can afford the book.

Preah Sdach Korn is the research work of Dr. Ros Chantrabotr written under the sponsorship of Prime Minister Hun Sen and his wife. The first publication of 5,000 books did not meet the demand of the general public, youths, intellectuals, students, and teachers.

Preah Sdach Korn contains 355 17.5-cm by 25-cm pages, divided into three sections and 11 chapters. The first section describes Cambodia of the post-Angkor period. The second section deals with the research and describes the history of King Korn. The third section depicts the capital of Preah Sri Chettha or Preah Sdach Korn. This book also contains pictures and illustrations of documents from the inscriptions pertaining to this historical period.

The above responsible officer said that the book has received wide support from readers of different backgrounds. He said he was happy to see Cambodian children of the present time paying greater attention to reading research books. However, he regretted that some opportunists have illegally published this book Preah Sdach Korn with questionable quality, thereby more or less impairing the reputation of the book.

He said that when the copyrighted book was being published a photocopied version of the book was already put on the market. This photocopied book was of smaller size, had paper of lower quality, and its print was blurred. He appealed to those who were behind this illegal act of plagiarism to end this shameful transgression.

Friday, March 30, 2007

A coincidence ... this 'Korn'-cidence?

Hun Sen (L) when he was still one of the communist leaders of the People's Republic of Kampuchea, Sdach Korn's bust (R) as seen by a contemporary sculptor.

Thursday, March 29, 2007
History: Hun Sen finances a book on Sdach Korn

By Leang Delux
Cambodge Soir

Unofficial Translation from French by Luc Sâr

Click here to read Cambodge Soir’s original article in French

The Prime Minister financed and provided a foreword to a book about Sdach Korn, a Cambodian historical figure, 5,000 copies of which were distributed out. He wants to rehabilitate this ordinary man who toppled his king and ruled during the 16th century, a man to whom the Prime Minister feels much affinity to.

The Prime Minister is now launching into history book publishing. Hun Sen financed a recently printed book dedicated to Preah Sdach Korn – an ordinary man who toppled his king and ruled over Cambodia during the 16th century – and to which Hun Sen provided a foreword. Almost 5,000 copies of the book written by Ros Chantrabot, the vice-president of the Cambodian Royal Academy, were distributed in various libraries in the country.

Sdach Korn, an ordinary man who became a king, is often compared to Hun Sen, a comparison which Hun Sen readily accepts. Sdach Korn was born from a “cast” that no longer exist nowadays, that of the families of Buddha servants, in comparison to Hun Sen who spent part of his youth at the Neakavoan pagoda, located along the Pochentong Boulevard. Both Sdach Korn and Hun Sen were born in the year of the dragon. Finally, both hold in common the fact they were born as ordinary men, and they have both climbed to the summit of power. “People say that I am reincarnation of Sdach Korn,” Hun Sen likes to recall.

As the brother-in-law of King Srey Sokunboth, Korn fell out of the King’s favor when the latter dreamt about a naga (dragon) which toppled him and destroyed the palace. The following day, the King saw an appearance: 2 nagas were floating above Korn’s head. The fortunetellers immediately confirmed his strange premonition: a man born in the year of the dragon would plunge the kingdom into chaos and he would topple the throne. Sentenced to death by the king, Korn was able to escape and formed an army to topple Srey Sokunboth. Becoming the new king, Sdach Korn reestablished order in the society and introduce the first currency in Cambodia, the sleung which is still being printed nowadays by the National Bank as tourist souvenirs.

However, nowadays, Sdach Korn suffers from an ambiguous reputation: he is sometimes seen as a man who is thirsty for power and who does not hesitate to take it by force, and sometimes he is seen as a peaceful monarch who brought prosperity to the kingdom. The prime minister financed in part this book in order to rehabilitate the memory of this little-known historical figure. In his foreword, Hun Sen couldn’t stop praising his intellectual guide whom he presents as the true inventor of individual freedom, and the first theoretician on class struggle. “One can consider Sdach Korn as a world-class hero: he was the first to put into practice the freedom principle, well before France – which is known as the country of Human rights, and where rights and freedoms were initiated not until the 18th century. Sdach Korn also used the theory of class struggle to build the country, whereas Karl Marx, the father of communism, did not publish his theory until the 19th century,” Hun Sen explained. He considers Sdach Korn to be the catalyst for the first democratic revolution in Cambodia. In order to rally people to his cause, Sdach Korn promised them to abolish the “cast” of families of Buddha servants which was hereditary, as was the custom since several centuries ago.

In his introduction, Ros Chantraboth pointed out 3 episodes in the history of the kingdom where an ordinary man toppled the throne. During the 13th century, Trasak Pa’em (sweet cucumber) killed King Sihanouk Reach, whom he mistook for a thief. He married the king’s daughter and took over the throne. During the 16th century, it was Korn’s turn to rise against the palace, and during the 20th century, Marshall Lon Nol toppled Norodom Sihanouk. “These 3 events are not natural and their causes are complex. The majority of the population supported these coup d’état. The consequences must be drawn for the new generations [to learn about],” he wrote. According to Ros Chantraboth, a professor in political science, Sdech Korn’s chapter is the least studied about, and this led him to work on it. He insisted that [the writing of this book] has no demagoguery aim. “I work on it since 1993. I specialized myself in political science to understand the theories and political strategies, to learn how my ancestors’ country was built. I want to know the factors which destroy and weaken our nation,” he explained.

Several initiatives involving Sdach Korn are currently being undertaken: in addition to this book, and the printing of the old currency, the sleung, the prime minister announced last year, his willingness to develop a tourist site at the location of Sdach Korn’s former city, north of Kompong Cham.