Showing posts with label US politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US politics. Show all posts

Monday, December 19, 2011

Analysts: Questions remain as U.S. troops leave Iraq

Washington (CNN) -- The departure of U.S. troops left many questions lingering in Iraq Sunday, analysts told CNN's "State of the Union."

"There are a lot of things here that are not finished. There are activities in the region that are still sitting on the edge of potential conflict," said retired Gen. James Cartwright, former vice-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Paul Bremer, a former envoy to Iraq under President George W. Bush, said President Barack Obama had "placed a very big bet" by pulling out troops.

"The definition of victory actually was given by the president when he made the announcement we were pulling out. He said a democratic Iraq can be a model for the region. That's right. That's what President Bush also said. And the question is, can a democratic Iraq survive if America pulls out before the job is done?" he said.

Thursday, May 05, 2011

Chhun Yasith's case allowed Hun Xen to demonstrate — with an assist from a federal court in Los Angeles — that his reach now extends all the way to Long Beach

The Lonely War

The California accountant who tried to overthrow a foreign despot

May 05, 2011
By Eric Pape
Los Angeles Time (California, USA)

Yasith Chhun
Chhun in the heady days before the attack
The revolution’s HQ in Long Beach
Chhun plots the coup.
Chhun after the failed coup
Ultimately, the case has also allowed Cambodia's leader to demonstrate — with an assist from a federal court in Los Angeles — that his reach now extends all the way to Long Beach.

Long Beach accountant Yasith Chhun stood before Judge Dean D. Pregerson in a Los Angeles courtroom on June 22, 2010. The judge noted that the bespectacled Cambodian-American wasn't a "bad man," just someone who had the misfortune to be born in a place where terrible things were happening.

Still, Pregerson chose to sentence Chhun to life in prison for his pitiful attempt to overthrow the despotic government of Cambodia.

How does a judge condemn someone who isn't a bad guy to life behind bars? As Chhun's defense attorney Richard C. Callahan said, comparing Chhun's punishment with that given to criminals who committed far more serious crimes, "None of this makes any sense."

Indeed, many exiles living in the United States are being celebrated for trying to foment revolutions in their home countries of Libya, Iran, Iraq and elsewhere. But unlike those Americans, Chhun fell into one of those eddies of U.S. foreign policy that swirls with contradictions.

Thursday, January 27, 2011

US Elections Showed ‘Smooth’ Example: Observer

President Barack Obama addressed US Congress recently. (Photo: AP)
Men Kimseng, VOA Khmer
Washington, D.C. Monday, 17 January 2011
The ruling party should listen to others who are not in the race because they could see more,” said a caller who identified himself as Svay Rin. “They should not be mad at criticism.”
The recent midterm elections in US Congress that put the Republicans in control of the House of Representatives should serve as a good model for Cambodians on how power can be shifted smoothly, the head of a leading rights group said.

Ou Virak, president of the Cambodian Center for Human Rights, said that in Cambodia, that smoothness is not a trend yet.

“In Cambodia, a change of the political party in power at the National Assembly will have an impact on all politics,” he said, as a guest on “Hello VOA.”

Thursday, November 04, 2010

[US] Election 2010 [-Congress power shift, Democrats barely hold on to the Senate]

Rare sight: Incumbent Democratic Congressman Ed Perlmutter does cartwheels onstage during his victory celebration in Denver, Colorado, after learning he had held on to his seat
November 2, 2010
Editorial
The New York Times

Voters in Tuesday’s elections sent President Obama a loud message: They don’t like how he’s doing his job, they’re even angrier at Congressional Democrats and they gave the House back to the Republicans. The Republicans spent months fanning Americans’ anger over the economy and fear of “big government,” while offering few ideas of their own. Exit polls indicated that they had succeeded in turning out their base, and that the Democrats had failed to rally their own.

Americans who voted described themselves as far more conservative than they did in 2006 and 2008 — and than the population as a whole. More than 4 in 10 said that they supported the Tea Party movement. But more than half of the voters said they have an unfavorable view of the Republican Party.

The question is: Will either side draw the right lessons from this midterm election?



Mr. Obama, and his party, have to do a far better job of explaining their vision and their policies. Mr. Obama needs to break his habits of neglecting his base voters and of sitting on the sidelines and allowing others to shape the debate. He needs to do a much better job of stiffening the spines of his own party’s leaders.

He has made it far too easy for his opponents to spin and distort what Americans should see as genuine progress in very tough times: a historic health care reform, a stimulus that headed off an even deeper recession, financial reform to avoid another meltdown.

Mr. Obama has a lot of difficult work ahead of him. The politics in Washington will likely get even nastier. Before he can hope to build the minimal bipartisan consensus needed to move ahead, Mr. Obama will have to rally more Americans to the logic of his policies.

The question for the Republicans now is whether they are going to bask in triumphalism or get down to the real work of governing. It is one thing to pander and obstruct when you are out of power. With a divided government, it won’t take long for voters to demand that they explain their plans.

John Boehner, the likely speaker of the House, has not provided a clue of how his party will begin to cut the deficit, which Republicans say is their top priority. One of the few specific promises he has made would dig an even deeper hole: extending all of the Bush-era tax cuts.

And exit polls suggested that even these more conservative voters get what the Republican Party leadership still doesn’t: that there is no way to tackle the deficit and slash taxes at the same time. Only 19 percent said cutting taxes was the top priority for the next Congress.

Anticipating a big win on Tuesday, leading Republicans haven’t been talking about substance, only more obstructionism. Mr. Boehner said the other day that the president was welcome to support Republican programs. But as for Mr. Obama’s agenda, he said, “We’re going to do everything — and I mean everything we can do — to kill it, stop it, slow it down, whatever we can.”

Mike Pence, the No. 3 Republican, said there would be “no compromise” on repealing the health care reform law and permanently extending all Bush-era tax cuts, including for the wealthiest Americans.

A Republican majority in the House of Representatives should pursue Republican priorities. But what we have been hearing sounds disturbingly like what we heard after the 1994 election, when Newt Gingrich, then the speaker-to-be, announced that there would be no compromising on his agenda.

The result was gridlock. The Republicans shut down the government, which ultimately cost Mr. Gingrich his job and the Republicans their majority.

One thing is very clear from all the polls and all the voting: Americans are fed up with that sort of gamesmanship. It’s bad for the country.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Cambodian-American Sam Meas lost his bid in the Massachusetts Republican primary

Cambodian-American candidate to the Republican primary Sam Meas

Niki Tsongas, Jon Golnick to battle for 5th

Wednesday, September 15, 2010
By Hillary Chabot Boston Herald (Massachusetts, USA)
Golnik beat out Sam M. Meas of Haverhill; Robert L. Shapiro of Andover; and Thomas J.M. Weaver of Westford in the primary
A feisty U.S. Rep. Niki Tsongas (D-Lowell), who vowed yesterday she won’t fall to the kind of GOP political tsunami that swept U.S. Sen. Scott Brown into office, prepared last night for a race against primary victor Jon A. Golnik.

“Voters will have a clear choice between my record of results and stale Republican ideas like privatizing Social Security, and tax breaks for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans,” Tsongas said.

Golnik - who beat out three other candidates in a tight race - said he’s ready to take on Tsongas.

“As an incumbent, she has to run against her own record, and she can’t defend the fact that 90 percent of the time, she voted with (House Speaker Nancy) Pelosi,” said Golnik, a Carlisle resident.

National Republicans have been licking their chops over the fifth congressional district since Brown, a Wrentham Republican, was elected in January. The 29-town district features a strong conservative base that GOP officials hope to capitalize on.

Golnik beat out Sam M. Meas of Haverhill; Robert L. Shapiro of Andover; and Thomas J.M. Weaver of Westford in the primary.

Friday, September 03, 2010

Torture persists in Cambodia

Friday, September 3, 2010
Republican American
"The greatest gift our country can give to the Cambodian people is peace, not guns. And the best way to accomplish that goal is by ending military aid now." — Rep. Christopher J. Dodd, D-2nd District, March 12, 1975
For his role in the genocide of 2 million of his countrymen after U.S. military aid to his Southeast Asian nation ended in 1975, Kaing Guek Eav, aka Duch, has become the first Khmer Rouge figure to be convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity by a U.N.-backed tribunal.

From 1976 to 1979, Duch was commandant of S-21, one of the most notorious prisons and interrogation centers in communist dictator Pol Pot's network of torture/death camps. On Duch's orders, 17,000 people, maybe more, were tortured to death for crimes they didn't commit. Their bodies were buried in the mass graves in what came famous as the Cambodian Killing Fields. His camp had only 12 known survivors.

Normally quick to fire off news releases touting his role in shaping foreign relations and international history, Sen. Dodd has been silent about the Duch case. Understandably, the survivors of the Cambodian Holocaust have been more forthcoming. Said a man who survived 12 days of torture at S-21: "I am not satisfied! We are victims two times, once in the Khmer Rouge time and now once again. (Duch's) prison is comfortable, with air-conditioning, food three times a day, fans and everything, I sat on the floor with filth and excrement all around." But this is what can happen when innocent people are left to the mercies of genocidal maniacs so a wet-behind-the-ears U.S. congressman half a world away can score political points with the anti-war left.

For his peacenikery, Mr. Dodd got 35 years in Congress. For exterminating 17,000 people, Duch got 35 years in prison — "11 hours per life," as another S-21 survivor put it — but the sentence was reduced to 19 years to reflect time served and his five years of "illegal detention" in a military prison. Justice is served, said the United Nations.

Gerald Warner of The Daily Telegraph of London offered a different perspective: "The derisory sentence imposed upon a monster testifies to the institutionalized impotence of liberal-controlled societies confronted by evil. The only penalty that could remotely have matched his crimes was death. In so-called 'democratic' countries, however, under the aegis of the EU and U.N. bien-pensant doctrines of clemency, capital punishment is deemed 'barbaric.' That is why Western pseudo-civilization is doomed to extinction at the hands of more ruthless elements. Sparing the life of a creature like Duch is not civilized, it is effete. It does not testify to our regard for the sanctity of human life, but to our rulers' contempt for it.

"A society that hangs a man for stealing a loaf of bread, as ours used to do, has disregard for the sanctity of human life; but a system that does not punish murder with death displays even more indifference to the rights of innocent life, giving sententious liberal cant precedence over the duty to testify to the value of life by insisting that murderers forfeit their own continued existence. Nor, as the inane liberal mantra intones, would it reduce us to the same level as murderers: that is claptrap."

The trial of Steven Hayes, charged with three counts of murder in the 2007 Cheshire home invasion, begins Sept. 13. His lawyer demanded Superior Court Judge Jon Blue abolish Connecticut's death penalty by judicial fiat. Thankfully, Judge Blue does not share the defense's contempt for the sanctity of human life.

Sunday, July 18, 2010

US defends military aid to Cambodia after opposition criticism

Mu Sochua (Photo: AP)

Sun, 18 Jul 2010
DPA
Mu Sochua said US support for military units have been implicated in human rights abuses was "a huge insult to the people of Cambodia.""So I am extremely disappointed by President Obama for allowing this to happen in Cambodia," Mu Sochua said.

She also accused the US Department of Defense of lying to the US Congress when it said Cambodian military units had not been involved in human rights abuses.
Phnom Penh - A senior US diplomat defended military aid to Cambodia on Sunday, following criticism from a prominent opposition parliamentarian.

William Burns, US under secretary of state for political affairs, said military exercises in Cambodia involving troops from the US and 23 Asia-Pacific nations were part of efforts to improve regional humanitarian and peacekeeping capabilities.

"Any military relationship we conduct around the world is consistent with US law, and so we look very carefully and vet very carefully the participants," Burns said at a ceremony in Phnom Penh to return seven ancient Cambodian artefacts recovered from the US.

The two-week exercise that began July 12 is part of the 2010 Global Peace Operations Initiative, a US-run effort to train peacekeepers.

Burns spoke after opposition legislator Mu Sochua said US support for military units have been implicated in human rights abuses was "a huge insult to the people of Cambodia.""So I am extremely disappointed by President Obama for allowing this to happen in Cambodia," Mu Sochua said.

She also accused the US Department of Defense of lying to the US Congress when it said Cambodian military units had not been involved in human rights abuses.

Mu Sochua said the international community was repeatedly failing in its obligations to Cambodia. She called on donors, who pledged more than 1 billion dollars this year, to impose conditions such as respect for human rights.

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Will Obama push for democracy?

July 7, 2010
By A. Gaffar Peang-Meth
Pacific Daily News (Guam)


Words can be tricky things, as two convoluted comments, quoted here, remind us. One is attributed to State Department spokesman Robert McCloskey: "I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant." The other is former chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan: "I guess I should warn you, if I turn out to be particularly clear, you've probably misunderstood what I've said."

Clarity would seem to be more evident in the 52-page "National Security Strategy" released on May 27 by the Obama team, outlining U.S. goals and actions in the world.

"To achieve the world that we seek, the U.S. must apply our strategic approach in pursuit of four enduring national interests" which are "inextricably linked" -- security (of the U.S., its citizens, its allies and partners), prosperity (a prosperous American economy), values (respect for universal values at home and abroad), international order (let nations pursue their interests, especially when they diverge).

Robert Kagan, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote an op-ed piece in the June 29 Washington Post in which he listed five recent, noteworthy foreign policy actions taken by President Obama.

Highest on the list was Obama's nomination of Gen. David Patraeus as commander in Afghanistan. It signaled "Obama's determination to succeed in Afghanistan" and warned of the "never realistic" July 2011 departure of U.S. troops.

Second, the U.N. Security Council resolution on Iran, though "mild, badly watered down by China and Russia," won't stop Iran from getting a bomb, but does increase pressure on Tehran. Third was Obama's handling of the U.S. base in Okinawa: "firm but engaged," and Tokyo's reaffirmed commitment to a U.S. alliance. Fourth, a free-trade agreement with South Korea represents the "first actual evidence" that the U.S. "is back" in Asia -- "If Congress can be persuaded to pass the agreement"!

Last, Obama's public "Reset Fact Sheet" shows Washington's "serious disagreements" with Moscow over Georgia." It calls for the end to Russian "occupation" of Abkhazia and South Ossetia."

What happened to Obama and democracy and human rights?

In the May 31 "A worldview that's light on human rights," the Post's deputy editorial page editor, Jackson Diehl, asked, "What sort of international order does Barack Obama seek?" He quoted Obama's introduction to the NSS, where he spoke about "the challenges of our times: countering violent extremism and insurgency; stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and securing nuclear materials; combating a changing climate and sustaining global growth; helping countries feed themselves and care for their sick; resolving and preventing conflict, while also healing its wounds."

"That's a big agenda," Diehl wrote, "But isn't something missing? ... Nowhere in that long sentence ... does Obama suggest that the international 'engagement' he proposes should serve to combat tyranny or oppression, or promote democracy. In that sense, ... human rights come second."

Obama has said the U.S. must shape a world order relying as much on the persuasiveness of its diplomacy as the might of its military; Secretary of State Hillary Clinton describes U.S. leadership as "building the coalitions that can produce results against those shared challenges ... providing incentives for states who are part of the solution, whether they recognize it or not, enabling them and encouraging them to live up to responsibilities that even a decade ago they would never have thought were theirs, and disincentives for those who do not."

The section on "values" affirms "certain values are universal" -- freedom to speak one's mind, to assemble without fear, to worship as one pleases, and to choose one's own leaders -- and states the U.S. "will work to promote them worldwide." Autocratic rulers "have repressed basic human rights and democratic practices in the name of economic development and national unity," but the "U.S. supports those who seek to exercise universal rights around the world."

Obama's introduction to the NSS states: "In all that we do, we will advocate for and advance the basic rights upon which our Nation was founded. ... We promote these values by living them, including our commitment to the rule of law. We will strengthen international norms that protect these rights and create space and support for those who resist repression."

Walter Shapiro of USA TODAY found the foreign policy buzz word "engagement" "brandished 42 separate times in 52 pages." He wrote: "Engagement is the active participation of the US in relationships beyond out borders ... the opposite of a self-imposed isolation that denies us the ability to shape outcomes."

For Foreign Policy's Will Inboden, "While the NSS rightfully devotes more rhetorical attention to the promotion of human rights and democracy, it unfortunately puts too much emphasis on the U.S. example alone" and "What (international reformers) want is active (U.S.) advocacy and support -- even when that support might cause friction in diplomatic engagement with their own governments."

Critics say there are certain rights and policies the U.S. should support unconditionally, regardless of how many other nations in the world oppose them. One stated that President Obama needs to back up his political rhetoric with support for political rights reform.

A. Gaffar Peang-Meth, Ph.D., is retired from the University of Guam, where he taught political science for 13 years. Write him at peangmeth@yahoo.com.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Notre Dame [Cambodian-American] Student Outlines Obama Speech

President Obama delivers commencement remarks at Notre Dame on Sunday. Photo by Jeff Haynes -- Pool/Getty Images

By Im Sothearith, VOA Khmer
Original report from Washington
25 May 2009


Soeng Sophat is a graduate student of international peace studies at Notre Dame University. He watched carefully as President Barrack Obama spoke to his university earlier this month, in what has become a well-publicized appearance thanks to the abortion debate and interruptions of protesters.

Soeng Sophat spoke to VOA Khmer both before and after the speech.

“I think that what he raised is important for the application of democracy as well as conflict resolution,” Soeng Sophat said of Obama. “In general, parties have different views on certain issues. The important thing is to create the opportunity for discussion and dialogue so that we can find common ground.”

Before Obama’s speech to his graduating class, Soeng Sophat told VOA Khmer that Notre Dame represented a large Catholic community in the US, and therefore there would be a lot of opposition to a pro-abortion stance.

He explained the debate between pro-life, which favors the life of an unborn fetus, and pro-choice, which favors options for pregnant women, such as abortion.

“Pro-life is a fundamental moral principle of Catholics,” he said, citing a 2004 decision by Catholic bishops.

As a student, Soeng Sophat said he was interested in freedom of expression and the decentralization of government, such as the US’s federal, state and local authorities. He was also interested in the possibilities for conflict resolution within a democracy, he said.

“That’s what our country should learn,” he said. “We usually use violence to solve problems. In order to solve problems non-violently, first we need independent institutions acceptable to all parties, and we all must hold to the ideas that we can solve problems together non-violently. Obama’s appearance encourages debate about the differences, especially the abortion issue. I expect to learn how they deal with it.”

Obama’s Notre Dame appearance thrust the new president into the abortion debate. During the speech the president challenged notions of conflict resolution by saying that there may in fact be intractable differences between the two camps.

Following that speech, Soeng Sophat described the appearance of less than 50 demonstrators, including 38 people who sneaked onto campus and were arrested. A low-flying plane dropped anti-abortion banners before the university created a “no-fly” zone, he said.

“During his speech, there were interruptions from four people shouting out,” he said. “Someone shouted out, ‘Stop killing our children! How can problems be solved while you allow people to kill our children?’ Then students booed back and shouted out, ‘Yes, we can.’ His 30-minute speech focused on the disagreements over abortion, the identity of Notre Dame University, the American people’s beliefs, both Catholic and non-Catholic. He said that when we don’t agree on a particular issue, we need to seek common ground and start from there.”

To Soeng Sophat, the president raised important questions about the application of democracy and conflict resolution, saying that, in general, parties usually have different views on certain issues.

“I was lucky to be an eye-witness to United States president and to how he dealt with this issue,” Soeng Sophat said. “It was interesting to see the president’s reaction to those who opposed him. He said he agreed that they have their reasons to oppose. In this sense, I think they have a culture of debate. At the family, community and national levels, they have a tradition of discussion and debate based on reasoning, to solve complicated problems.

“Freedom of expression and debate has been rooted in their society for a long time,” he said. “I think in our country, we have not yet had a culture of non-violent solution to problems. We have not yet had the culture of debate and discussion based on reason, because everyone sticks to his views, and they sometimes use violence to oppose opponents without listening to their reasons and views. A culture of debate and non-violent conflict resolution can be created through an education system, which educates a younger generation to use non-violent solutions to problems.”

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

US-Cambodians Watch as Obama Takes Office

By Taing Sarada, VOA Khmer
Original report from Washington
26 January 2009


Americans watched Barrack Obama become the 44th president of the United States last week, and some of them said they had new hopes for the US economy, as well as national and global security.

Jeffrey Sdoeung, a Cambodian-American from the state of Rhode Island, said he traveled for 10 hours in the bitter cold to watch the Jan. 20 inauguration.

"Our country is facing difficulty now, including money and jobs," he said. "It is all very difficult, but after I heard Obama's speech, I have a lot of hope, because now we have one wonderful president, who can help people and other countries around the world."

Sdoeung said he was attending his first inauguration and was surprised to find millions of people from across America gathered on the National Mall in front of the US Capitol building.

"I have never seen as many people as this," he said. "On the morning of Inauguration Day, I traveled from my friend's house in DC by Metro train to the National Mall…and I saw so many people filling the train, it was amazing."

Grant Quinn, another Cambodian-American, from Washington, had not traveled as far as Sdoeung, but he said he too had more confidence in the US economy after hearing Obama's speech.

"Now the American people have lost a lot of jobs, but I think that Obama has his own program to provide more jobs to people," he said.

He had not attended the inaugurations of former president George W. Bush, he said.

"When I was young, I went to see the inaugurations of Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, Sr., and Bill Clinton," he said. "But I did not go to see George W. Bush's inauguration, because I didn't like him."

Vutha Chinn, who lives in Philadelphia, said he felt happy on behalf of Khmer refugees who had come to a land of opportunity and were now able to participate in events such as the inauguration.

"I am very grateful to be able to participate in and applaud Obama's inauguration and support his success in becoming American's president," he said.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Huge Crowds Gather for Obama's Swearing In

On the eve of his inauguration as the 44th president, Barack Obama visited Monday with children at a Washington school in observance of the National Day of Service Project. (Landov)

JANUARY 20, 2009

By LAURA MECKLER and JONATHAN WEISMAN
The Wall Street Journal


The 44th U.S. President Is Expected to Call on Americans to Embrace a New Culture of Responsibility

WASHINGTON -- The National Mall swelled into a vast scene of expectation Tuesday as excited crowds clogged mass transit lines and security checkpoints to witness the swearing-in of President-elect Barack Obama.

Energized by the historic moment, hundreds of thousands of people turned this city's orderly grid of streets into a festive party scene. Ready to endure below-freezing temperatures, they streamed up from subway stations and thronged past parked buses, emergency vehicles and street vendors, bound for Pennsylvania Avenue and the National Mall for the inauguration.

The crowd could reach two million people, one of the largest gatherings in Washington's history. Millions more will be watching across the U.S. and around the world, with outdoor video screens planned for public squares.

Early Tuesday, Mr. Obama and his family attended a private service at St. John's Episcopal Church, a tradition for those about to become president. The family of Vice President-elect Joe Biden also attended. The Obamas waved to bystanders, then entered the church to applause from about 200 people. The choir and congregation began singing the hymn, "O God Our Help in Ages Past.''

Bishop Charles E. Blake Sr., of Los Angeles, drew murmurs and chuckles when he blessed the Obamas and asked that "they may finish these two terms in office" stronger than they are now.

The Obamas and Joe and Jill Biden went for coffee at the White House with President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard Cheney and their wives. Then they plan to travel the short distance to the Capitol for Mr. Obama's history-making moment.

Just beyond the White House fence, huge crowds braved freezing temperatures and jostled for positions to see -- with the naked eye or on Jumbotron screens -- Mr. Obama take the oath of office at noon with his hand on the Bible that once belonged to the last president to hail from Illinois, Abraham Lincoln.

The 44th president will stand opposite the Lincoln Memorial, two miles away, where 45 years ago, Martin Luther King Jr. called upon the nation to judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. Mr. Obama spent Monday celebrating Dr. King's birthday as a day of service, while street vendors sold memorabilia juxtaposing the images of the two black leaders.

Little official business is expected Tuesday in Washington. The real work of the new president will begin Wednesday, Mr. Obama's first full day in office. Aides said one of the new president's first actions will be summoning his national security team to begin preparing for a 16-month withdrawal of combat forces from Iraq, one of the main promises of his two-year-long campaign for the presidency.

That's just one of the new policies symbolizing the change to come as Washington shifts from eight years of Republican rule under George W. Bush. Within days, Mr. Obama also is expected to issue executive orders to begin closing the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, one of the most controversial symbols of the Bush administration's war on terror; reversing Mr. Bush's restrictions on federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research, and restoring funding for family-planning programs overseas.

On the economic front, Mr. Obama's administration is likely to soon issue new regulations forcing recipients of Wall Street bailout funds to be more transparent with the money, an aide said. The most-ailing financial institutions won't be forced to lend immediately, but healthier banks will be under pressure to move money from their vaults into the economy. "Transparency is going to make a big difference," the aide said.

The inauguration caps a weekend of events and pageantry, and officials predict as many as two million people will seek a spot on the National Mall. The inauguration will join Washington's biggest events, ranking with Dr. King's 1963 March on Washington, Lyndon Johnson's 1965 inauguration, and protests against the Vietnam War in the late 1960s.

Stuck in Traffic

By 4 a.m., lines of riders had already formed in suburban parking lots for the Metro transit system, which opened early and put on extra trains for the expected rush. Many parking lots filled up and had to be closed.

Warming tents and other facilities on the Mall were late opening because traffic and crowds delayed staffers from reaching them. Ticket holders approaching the Inaugural site on Capitol Hill awaited security sweeps in a line estimated at thousands.

"If you are black in America right now, that's all the inspiration you need -- a black president!" said David Reed, 39 years old, an African-American from Lexington, Ky., who was selling the comics Monday.

Britt Loudd of Charlotte, N.C., said that as a precinct organizer she made more than 2,200 calls for the campaign. Her three children, who joined her in Washington, also volunteered. "There was no choice," said Mrs. Loudd. "We had to be here."

Visitors made their way through a maze of crowd-control barriers and past dozens of sellers hawking wrist bands, T-shirts and a Spider-Man comic featuring Mr. Obama on the cover.

At the Capitol, a plexiglass shield extended about two feet up from the balustrade around the speaker's platform. Near the lectern, were seats reserved for Muhammad Ali, Elie Wiesel and Martin Luther King III.

Other groups of seats were saved for past presidents, vice presidents and their spouses -- the Clintons, the Gores, the Bushes and the Quayles. Each seat was furnished with a dark blue fleece blanket.

At the swearing-in ceremony, seated behind Mr. Obama, will be his chosen cabinet, including Hillary Clinton, expected to be confirmed as secretary of state later Tuesday. Also behind him will be his defeated election opponent, Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain.

Chief Justice John Roberts will administer the oath of office to Mr. Obama following the swearing in of his vice president, Joe Biden, by Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens.

President Bush will be there, too, departing immediately after the ceremony on a Marine chopper en route to Texas, where he will begin the next chapter of his life as an ex-president.

Before Mr. Obama speaks, the evangelical Rev. Rick Warren will deliver the invocation, a choice that infuriated gay-rights activists but signaled the new president's interest in reaching out to Americans who are not part of his political base.

The swearing-in will be followed by a luncheon at the Capitol and a parade featuring high-school marching bands, drill teams and floats. The evening will conclude with 10 official inaugural balls and countless unofficial parties.

Pitching In

Mr. Obama on Monday spoke the message he will deliver at his swearing-in: The time has come for a new culture of public service, as well as a new national unity after years of bitter partisan political division.

"Given the crisis that we're in and the hardships that so many people are going through, we can't allow any idle hands," Mr. Obama said, taking a break from painting a dormitory at Sasha Bruce House, a shelter for homeless teens. "Everybody's got to be involved. Everybody's going to have to pitch in, and I think the American people are ready for that."

Throughout his campaign, Mr. Obama stressed that a nation that should have been rallied to service after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, instead drifted to complacency and consumerism. One of his first political promises was a $3.5 billion-a-year service plan to expand the AmeriCorps program established by President Bill Clinton by 250,000 slots, double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011, expand the Foreign Service, and create an Energy Corps to conduct renewable-energy and environmental-cleanup projects.

During appearances on Monday, Mr. Obama returned to the themes of unity and self-reliance.

"I am making a commitment to you as the next president, that we are going to make government work," he told volunteers at Coolidge High. "But I can't do it by myself. Michelle can't do it by herself. Government can only do so much....If we're waiting for someone else to do something, it never gets done."

T.W. Farnam contributed to this article
.

Monday, December 15, 2008

Corruption is Ubiquitous


Sunday, December 14, 2008
Op-Ed by Jayakhmer
On the web at http://www.modernprogressivekhmer.blogspot.com


Corruption knows neither cultures nor political systems. The question is can a political system handle corruptions. A recent corruption indictment of the governor of Illinois reverberated across the world. Just in case, Cambodian people pay attention to his case, they will see that American political system of checks and balances will continue to prevail. Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich was arrested and charged on two counts of indictment for corruptions.

Gov. Rod Blagojevich, a former congressman, was first elected as Illinois governor in 2002 and was reelected again in 2006.

According to Daniel W. Cain, the FBI agent who submitted the affidavit in support of the indictments, the governor was a suspect for corruption since 2003. The governor and his chief of staff were alleged to have violated Title 18 of United State codes 1341, 1343, 1346, and 1349. As a public servant of the state, he was alleged to have violated state code Article VIII, Section 1(a) and criminal law of the State of Illinois (720 ILCS 5/33-3(c) and 720 ILSC 5/33-1(d)).

The federal indictment charged that the governor “obtained and attempted to obtain financial benefits for Rod Blagojevich, members of the Blagojevich family, and third parties including Friends of Blagojevich, in exchange for appointments to state boards and commissions, state employment, state contracts, and access to state funds; …threatened to withhold from, the Tribune Company substantial state financial assistance in connection with Wrigley Field, which assistance Rod Blagojevich believed to be worth at least $100 million to the Tribune Company, for the private purpose of inducing the controlling shareholder of the Tribune Company to fire members of the editorial board of the Chicago Tribune, a newspaper owned by the Tribune Company, who were responsible for editorials critical of Rod Blagojevich; [and] attempted to use ROD Blagojevich’s authority to appoint a United States Senator for the purpose of obtaining personal benefits for Rod Blagojevich…”

On December 12, 2008 Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan called on the State Supreme Court to temporary remove the governor from the office and to appoint lieutenant governor as acting governor to carry on the state’s affairs.

“We think it is very clear he is incapable of serving,” Madigan said in the news conference, “We want to make sure the people of Illinois have a governor who can legitimately fulfill the duties of that office."

This case highlights the fact that all governments are vulnerable to corruptions. It is a fact of human nature and human greed. This is why it is extremely critical that a government has proper devices to handle corruptions.

Although corruption is ubiquitous, it does not mean that a government should ignore corruptions. Corruption if allows to be rampant will destroy the confidence and the trust of the people for its government. It would be a gross generalization to say that a government is corrupted. While individuals in a government are corrupted and without corruption laws capable of prosecuting such individuals, a government is as responsible as those who corrupted.

When it comes to corruptions, government has the burden of prove to demonstrate that it governs in transparency and truly exists to serve and protect the interests of the nation and its citizens. Cambodia should have the political will and the courage to create effective corruption laws for it is long over due.

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

NBC: OBAMA ELECTED 44TH PRESIDENT


Illinois senator to become first African-American executive in U.S. history

BREAKING NEWS

By Alex Johnson
Reporter
msnbc.com


Barack Obama, a 47-year-old first-term senator from Illinois, shattered more than 200 years of history Tuesday night by winning election as the first African-American president in the history of the United States, according to projections by NBC News.

Obama reached the 270 electoral votes he needed for election at 11 p.m. ET, when NBC News projected that he would win California, Washington and Oregon.

Campaigning as a technocratic agent of change in Washington, not as a pathbreaking civil rights figure, Obama swept to victory over Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona, whose running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, was seeking to become the nation’s first female vice president.

A crowd nearing 100,000 people gathered in Grant Park in Chicago, awaiting an address by Obama. Hundreds of thousands more — Mayor Richard Daley said he would not be surprised if a million Chicagoans jammed the streets — were watching on a large television screen outside the park.

Surveys of voters as they left polling places nationwide indicated the breadth of the victory by Obama, the son of a Kenyan father and a white American mother. As expected, he won overwhelmingly among African-American voters, but he also won a slim majority of white voters. He won among women and Latino voters, reversing a longstanding Republican trend. And he won by more than 2-to-1 among voters of all races 30 years old and younger.

That dynamic was telling in Ohio, which President Bush won in 2004, and in Pennsylvania, where McCain poured in millions of dollars of scarce resources. Obama won both.

Obama also took Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey and New York, all states with hefty electoral vote hauls, NBC News projected. He also won Virginia, reversing 40 years of Republican victories there.

McCain countered with Texas and numerous smaller states, primarily in the South and the Great Plains.

In interviews with NBC News, aides to McCain said they were proud that they had put up a good fight in “historically difficult times.”

A senior adviser said McCain himself was “fine” but that he felt “he let his staff and supporters down.”

Obama will have a strongly Democratic Congress on the other end of Capitol Hill. The Democrats won strong majorities in both the House and the Senate. NBC News projected that the party would fall just short of a procedurally important 60 percent “supermajority” in the Senate, however.
Record turnout delays key results

In the end, Florida, the scene of electoral chaos in recent elections, had little impact. Florida had been closely watched, but results there and in other closely contested states were delayed after record numbers of voters flocked to polling stations, energized by an election in which they would select either the nation’s first black president or its first female vice president.

Obama, who led in nearly all public opinion polls, and McCain both launched get-out-the-vote efforts that led to long lines at polling stations in a contest that Democrats were also hoping would help them expand their majorities in both houses of Congress.

Americans voted in numbers unprecedented since women were given the franchise in 1920. Secretaries of state predicted turnouts approaching 90 percent in Virginia and Colorado and 80 percent or more in big states like Ohio, California, Texas, Virginia, Missouri and Maryland.

At New Shiloh Church Ministries on Mastin Lake in Huntsville, Ala., Stephanie Lacy-Conerly brought along a chair, expecting to stay for hours.

“It’s exciting,” she said. “It’s an historical moment.”

Election officials around the country braced for problems, but only minor issues were reported. However, the McCain campaign filed suit in Virginia, home to several major military bases, complaining that absentee ballots were not mailed on time to many members of the military serving overseas.

History played down in favor of issues

Voters were lured to the polls by an election with the potential to make history. Both campaigns played down the historic nature of their tickets, however, preferring to emphasize what they offered as plans to bring sweeping change to Washington and close the door on the two-term presidency of George W. Bush, whose approval ratings are near historic lows.

Election experts predicted that as many as 140 million Americans would vote, many of them minority, immigrant and young Americans who were casting ballots for the first time.

Maria Reyes, who immigrated from El Salvador and was sworn in as a citizen in August, was one of them. She cast her ballot with help from her daughter, Elvia.

“It’s wonderful time for our country right now — Obama!” Reyes said as she waved a small American flag.

In the Little Saigon section of Los Angeles, Timothy Ngo, a Vietnamese immigrant, turned out to support McCain.

“I came here as a refugee, so Mr. McCain and I grew up and fought in the same war in Vietnam,” Ngo said.

Six in 10 voters picked the economy as the most important issue facing the nation, according to data from national exit polls examined by msnbc.com. Only 9 percent said terrorism was the most important issue.

Pessimism over the economy is usually a grim omen for the party in control of the White House. In the elections of 1992, 1980, 1960 and 1932, economic distress, to some degree, resulted in the party in control losing the White House.
Obama, McCain cast their ballots

Obama and his wife, Michelle, voted with their young daughters at their sides at Beulah Shoesmith Elementary School in Hyde Park, Ill. The family was ushered inside ahead of a line of their neighbors that wrapped around the block.

Fellow voters watched in silence and snapped cell-phone pictures. They cheered when Obama held up his validation slip with a smile and said, “I voted.”

“The journey ends, but voting with my daughters, that was a big deal,” he told reporters later.

Obama’s final days of campaigning were bittersweet: He was mourning the loss of his grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, who helped raise him but died of cancer Sunday night and never got to see the results of the historic election.

In Delaware, Obama’s running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, went to the polls with his elderly mother. Speaking to reporters on his plane, Biden said he had made a deal with his wife, Jill.

“If you get the vice presidency and get elected, you can get a dog,” Biden said his wife told him. “I know what kind I want, [but] I don’t know what kind I’m going to get yet. We’re not there yet. The deal’s not closed yet.”

McCain, meanwhile, cast his ballot early Tuesday at a church near his home in central Phoenix. A small crowd cheered “Go, John, go!” and “We love you!” as he stepped out of a sport utility vehicle with his wife, Cindy. One person carried a sign that read, “Use your brain, vote McCain!”

Palin returned to where her political career began to cast her vote in the snow-dusted, two-story Wasilla City Hall where she once presided as a small-town mayor.

Palin, accompanied by her husband, Todd, voted just after 7 a.m. Tuesday, pushing aside a red, white and blue curtain on a voting booth and handing her white paper ballot to a clerk.

With Tom Curry of msnbc.com and Kelly O’Donnell, Steve Handelsman and George Lewis of NBC News. The following NBC stations contributed to this report: KPNX of Phoenix; WAFF of Huntsville, Ala.; WLWT of Cincinnati; and WTMJ of Milwaukee.

Saturday, November 01, 2008

Obama in Cambodia

Expats at the FCC in Phnom Penh watch the final Obama vs. McCain debate.

Expats at the FCC in Phnom Penh watch the final Obama vs. McCain debate.

October 31, 2008
Elena Lesley
Huffington Post


PHNOM PENH -- Since early September, American nationals have flocked to Phnom Penh's Foreign Correspondents' Club restaurant every Saturday night. The political debates they come to watch may have happened days earlier -- and been replayed on TV multiple times. And, as with the Palin vs. Biden debate, electricity blackouts might repeatedly disrupt the screening.

Still, the FCC events regularly attract a full house.

"Americans in Cambodia are turning out in droves," Wayne Weightman, the Cambodia chair for Democrats Abroad recently told me. "People may have already seen the debates, but they want to watch them together."

While they may be living thousands of miles from home, working in a poverty-stricken Southeast Asian country, Americans in Cambodia are well aware of this election's significance. As are their friends of other nationalities -- Cambodian, French, German, Australian, Korean. As an American, I am always struck by the amount of attention paid to U.S. politics by citizens of other countries -- we certainly do not return the favor -- and this year, interest is especially keen.

As Weightman told me: "It's not just Americans in Cambodia, but all nationalities in Cambodia. The whole world is watching this."

I was also in Cambodia for the 2004 presidential election. Although there was certainly a good deal of interest in the election's outcome at that time, the local political activity this year has far surpassed what I saw in the past. Conversations and debates about U.S. politics buzz throughout the city's expat bars and cafes. Foreign-run restaurants are planning to start broadcasting election results in the early morning of Nov. 5 -- which would be the evening of Nov. 4 in America.

A dynamic Democrats Abroad chapter here has helped motivate the already energized electorate. Weightman is the force behind the organization. An immigration consultant from Hawaii who has lived in Cambodia for the last eight years, he remembers the disappointment he felt in 2004: "I was sitting in a little hotel room in Thailand watching Fox news, because that's the only channel they had. I was ill watching the results."

Weightman vowed to get more involved in Cambodia's fledgling Democrats Abroad chapter. Although he happens to be a high school friend of Barack Obama's, he says he would have become chair of the organization this January no matter who the Democratic nominee was.

"It's been a huge, huge undertaking," Weightman admitted. "I've put a lot of my life on hold."

Including his honeymoon, which had to be postponed so Weightman could organize a February primary at Phnom Penh's "USA Donuts." His house has been transformed into Democrats Abroad headquarters, filled with banners, baseball caps and "I voted for Obama from Cambodia" t-shirts.

"If we were any more grassroots, we'd be digging a hole in the ground," Weightman joked.

He says the local effort has built momentum over time and now has a devoted base of volunteers. They spend eight- to ten-hour stretches manning desks at the FCC, helping Americans navigate the labyrinth of state voter registration procedures and absentee ballot deadlines. Volunteers even assist Republican voters, who do not have a comparable party organization in Cambodia.

Weightman admits that voting from abroad "is not a simple process. What your little ballot has to negotiate to get to being counted could make an incredible film."

Each state has different regulations and deadlines. The process usually involves multiple mailings, faxes and email correspondence with people who have no sense of the conditions of the place you are voting from. (I nearly laughed when I received an email from my home state suggesting I pick up materials at any "library, post office or DMV office.") And a developing country like Cambodia, with its shaky phone lines and sluggish postal system, is more challenging than many.

There are around six to seven million Americans living overseas, and while it's against Democrats Abroad policy to disclose at this point how many people the group has registered, participation in Cambodia "has dwarfed our expectations," Weightman said. "The amount of people we've touched is amazing."

No doubt many of them will skip work next week and gather in front of two big screens at the FCC, waiting to see if their labor-intensive votes made an impact.

"I don't live in America, but it's still my country," Weightman told me. "Nov. 5, I want to feel I did all I could."

Monday, October 27, 2008

Priceless Moments

Oct 24, 2008
Op-Ed by Jayakhmer
On the web at http://www.modernprogressivekhmer.blogspot.com


The price of government bailed out of Wall Street - $700 billion; a record fund raising between Sen. Obama and Sen. McCain – over $684 million; the Dow Jones index drops for the first time in years- below 9000 points; the price tag for Gov. Palin war drops for the campaign - $150,000.00; and seeing democracy in action - priceless!!!

Recent economic and political developments in the U.S. provide ample priceless moments for democracy enthusiasts. As a Cambodian American who longs to see democracy flourishes in Cambodia, I am looking for learnable moments. Here are a few precious events that highlight the beauty of American democracy and its politics.

The system of checks and balances was truly at play when the U.S. tried to deal with the liquidity crisis. As the head of the executive branch, President George W. Bush could not demand or order but had to work extremely hard with Congress to approve the bailout. When the House of Representative failed to muster enough votes to pass the bill, the president was completely powerless. Otherwise, he is one of the most powerful men on the face of the free world. It took Congress twice to pass the bill.

Senator Ted Stevens, the longest serving senator from Alaska was indicted for a crime and now is standing a trial for corruption charges.

He is facing a seven-count indictment charges for making false statement by not disclosing gifts and services more than $250,000 from VECO Corp. that violated "the Federal Ethics in Government Act requires all senators to file financial disclosure statements detailing their transactions during the previous calendar year, including the disclosure of gifts above a specified value and all liabilities greater than $10,000."

After leveling charges and counter charges against each other in one of the most exciting and contentious elections, Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. McCain took time off from their busy schedules to attend Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner. They spent a wonderful evening ridiculed and poked fun of themselves and each other.

Sen. Obama noted the significant of the event, "I think it is a tribute to American democracy that with two weeks left and a hard fought election, the two of us could come together, and sit down at the same dinner table without preconditions.''

Sen. McCain called Sen. Obama "an impressive follow" and wished his opponent "well."

Here I am in America witnessing democracy in action. The mere fact that simple ideas such as checks and balances, no one is above the law, and civility in politics continues to reinforces American democracy and it politics makes it the most envious system in the world.

I certainly hope that we, Cambodians, learn a thing or two from these priceless moments.

Jayakhmer