Showing posts with label Social inequity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social inequity. Show all posts

Monday, May 07, 2012

សុខ​ចិត្ត​ធ្វើ​ចំណាក​ស្រុក​ទៅ​ស្រុក​គេ​ទាំង​ខុស​ច្បាប់​គ្រាន់​បើ​ជាង​រស់​នៅ​ក្នុង​សង្គម​អយុត្តិ​ធម៌?

សពប៉េ​អឹមដែល​ត្រូវ​គេ​ចោទ​ថា បាន​បាញ់​សម្លាប់​​ឈុត វុទ្ធី​។ រូបថត សហ​ការី

Monday, 07 May 2012
វិភាគសង្គម ដោយ តុងសុប្រាជ្ញ
The Phnom Penh Post
មាន​សេដ្ឋីៗ​មួយ​ចំនួន​តូច ​ដែល​រាស្រ្ត​តែង​តែ​យំ​តវ៉ា​យក​ដី​ពួក​គាត់​មក​វិញ​រាល់​ថ្ងៃ ​ដូច​ជា​យាយភូ​ យាយ​ផាន​ ឧកញ្ញ៉ា​លីយ៉ុង​ផាត់​ ជា​ដើម​ បែរ​ទៅ​ជា​មាន​ដី​ដល់​ទៅ​​រាប់​លាន​​ហិក​តា​ទៅ​វិញ​?
ជា​លក្ខណៈ​ធម្ម​ជាតិ​របស់​មនុស្ស បើ​កាល​ណា​រស់​នៅ​គ្មាន​អ្វី​ហូប​ ឬ​ក៏​ហូប​មិន​គ្រប់​គ្រាន់​ហើយ គឺ​ខិត​ខំ​ព្យាយាម​យ៉ាង​ត្រដាប​ត្រដួស ​ទៅ​រក​ទីទួល មាន​សុវត្ថិ​ភាព​ ដែល​មាន​អាហារ​ហូប​ដើម្បី​ឲ្យ​បាន​រស់។​ ព្រោះ​គាត់​ ពុំ​ទាន់​បាន​ឆ្លង​ផុត​ពី​តម្រូវ​ការ​ជា​មូល​ដ្ឋាន ​ដូច​ទ្រឹស្តី​របស់​លោក​«ម៉ាស្លូ» ដែល​មនុស្ស​ត្រូវ​មាន​អាហារ​ សម្លៀក​បំពាក់ ​និង​ជម្រក​សមរម្យ​។​ ការ​ដែល​គ្មាន​​អ្វី​ហូប​ ​គឺ​ជា​កត្តា​ចម្បង​ធ្វើ​ឲ្យ​ពួក​គាត់​ ក្លាយ​ទៅ​ជា​មុខ​សញ្ញា​ជា​ជន​ងាយ​រង​គ្រោះ ​និង​ងាយ​ស្រួល​ក្នុង​ការ​អូស​ទាញ​កម្លាំង​ពល​កម្ម​ទៅ​ធ្វើ​ការ​នៅ​ក្រៅ ស្រុក​ដោយ​ប្រើ​ឃ្លា​មួយ​យ៉ាង​សាមញ្ញ​ថា៖ «​គេ​បបួល​កុំ​ឲ្យ​ខាន​ បើ​គេ​បាន​កុំ​ស្តាយ​ក្រោយ​!​»

ប្រសិន​បើ​យើង​មាន​ពេល​ សាក​ល្បង​ទៅ​លេង​កម្សាន្ត​នៅ​ទីក្រុង​បាង​កក​ជា​ពិសេស​នៅ​តំបន់​សេដ្ឋកិច្ច​ សង្គម​វិត​ (Sukumvit​ area)​ យើង​នឹង​ឃើញ​ពលករ​ខ្មែរ​មួយ​ចំនួន​ ដែល​ជា​អ្នក​លក់​តាម​ហាង​ អ្នក​រត់​តុ ​អ្នក​ធ្វើ​ម្ហូប​នៅ​តាម​ភោជនីយ​ដ្ឋាន​ អ្នក​ធ្វើការ​នៅ​តាម​បារ​ អាច​និយាយ​ភាសា​ថៃ​បា​ន​យ៉ាង​ល្អ​ ហើយ​នៅ​តាម​ផ្លូវ​ដើរ​កាត់​ទទឹង​មហា​វិថី​សង្គម​វិត​នោះ ​យើង​នឹង​ជួប​អ្នក​សុំ​ទាន​ដែល​ភាគ​ច្រើន​ជាជន​ជាតិ​ខ្មែរ។​ ពួក​គាត់​ក៏​បាន​ប្រាប់​យើង​ទាំង​ទឹក​ភ្នែក​ទឹក​សម្បោរ​ថា គាត់មក​ពី​ស្រុក​ភូមិ​ណា​ មក​តាម​រយៈ​អ្នក​ណា ​និង​ពីមូល​ហេតុ​ដែល​បានជំរុញឲ្យទៅ​ទី​នោះ​ផងដែរ។​

ពលករ​ខ្មែរ​ខ្លះ​ទៀត​ ទៅ​ធ្វើ​ការ​លំបាកៗ​ហួស​កម្លាំង​ជាង​នេះ​ទៅ​ទៀត​ដូច​កញ្ជះ​គេ​ បុរសៗ​គ្នា ខ្លះ​នេសាទ​ធ្លាយ​ទៅ​ដល់​ប្រទេស​ឥណ្ឌូ​នេស៊ី​ ឯ​ស្រ្តី​វិញ ខ្លះ​ក្លាយ​ទៅ​ជា​ទាសករ​ផ្លូវ​ភេទ​ក៏​មាន​ ខ្លះ​ក៏​ធ្លាក់​ខ្លួន​ញៀន​ថ្នាំ ​ខ្លះ​ឆ្លង​ជំងឺ​អេដស៍​ និង​ខ្លះ​ត្រូវ​បាន​គេ​ជួញ​ដូរ​ផ្លូវ​ភេទ​។​ ថ្មីៗនេះ​មាន​ពលករ​ខ្មែរ​ស្លាប់​ជា​ហូរ​ហែ​ ខ្លះ​ស្លាប់​ដោយ​សារ​គេ​ធ្វើ​បាប​ឲ្យ​ធ្វើ​ការ​ហួស​កម្លាំង​ ដោយ​សារ​គ្រោះ​ថ្នាក់​ចរាចរណ៍​ក៏​មាន​ ខ្លះ​ស្លាប់​ដោយ​សារ​ទៅ​ចូល​កាប់​ឈើ​ប្រណីត​ខុស​ច្បាប់​ក៏​មាន​។​ យោង​តាម​ក្រសួង​មហា​ផ្ទៃ​ បាន​ឲ្យ​ដឹង​ថា​ ពលករ​ចំណាក​ស្រុក​ ១២០០០​ នាក់​ ត្រូវ​បាន​បញ្ជូន​ពី​ក្រៅ​ប្រទេស​មក​កម្ពុជា​វិញ​ ក្នុង​ឆ្នាំ​ ២០១១។

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Watching a country change

Richard Bridle (Photo: Men Kimlong)
Thursday, 22 March 2012
Bridget Di Certo
The Phnom Penh Post
“The other crucial issue for Cambodia is to tackle the alarming inequality that is growing here,” Bridle said.

The gap between those who are very rich and those who are very poor is worrying and it is a gap that is widening.”
It never used to be this fancy,” Richard Bridle said as he sat down yesterday to a double espresso in Phnom Penh’s Raffles Le Royal Hotel lobby.

When the UNICEF country director was first in Cambodia in 1983, he and his agency were sequestered in the hotel and could only leave under the watchful eye of a government-appointed “guide”.

But things are different now, and Bridle, who has spent nearly 30 years working here, is packing his bags for the bright lights of New York to a posting at UN Headquarters.

“When we first got to Cambodia, everything needed to be reestablished,” Bridle recounted.

Friday, December 09, 2011

Isn't it time for the UN to practice what it preaches?

No country, region or community is immune to corruption, a serious crime that can undermine social and economic development in all societies (Photo: Reuters)

“Although the poor may be marginalized by corruption, they will not be silenced.”
Time to fight back against ‘cancer’ of corruption – UN chief

8 December 2011
Source: UN News Centre


Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is urging everyone to do their part to stamp out corruption, which afflicts all countries, undermining social progress and breeding inequality and injustice.

“All of us have a responsibility to take action against the cancer of corruption,” he declares in a message for International Anti-Corruption Day, which is observed annually on 9 December.

No country, region or community is immune to corruption, which is a serious crime that can undermine social and economic development in all societies, according to the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Development at What Cost?

Saturday, March 20, 2010
Op-Ed by Pretty Ma



The above video clip of clashes between villagers in Kampong Speu and the authority is one of the repeating evidences long recorded and reported by all concerned human rights and civil society groups. Land evictions have driven large numbers of Cambodian families across the country, young and old into poverty and despair. Without immediate halt and without a change of government policy and attitude, plenty more Cambodians will face the same consequence with almost a certain future of long enduring hardships - a slavery like condition - for generations to come.

The Cambodian government could have conducted a more accommodated and yet humane investment policy. It should find for those evictees a new land with proper compensation of cash and shelter without resorting to forced eviction. If Cambodia can lease out so much land to foreigners, then it should be able to formulate a better inclusive investment policy than what it is doing now for its poor and its indigenous people. Speaking of indigenous people, their culture and life style will forever be altered, not for the better but for a whole lot worse than one can imagine.

The new round of assault on land eviction will reach farmers in remote areas, especially indigenous peoples who live far away from the eyes and ears of the main public. Since Cambodia is poised to focus more and more on developing its plantation economy, rubbers and acacia etc.., then we can expect to see a lot more events similar to the one in Kampong Speu taking place in the near future. Given that the government officials, judges and businessmen are not on the receiving end of the evictions, then its is hard to imagine anyone of them will ever understand the magnitude of the cold pain and daily apprehension of the evictees.

As I am writing this, it brought me back to my earlier years as I tried to explain to foreigners in the camp and in America of my personal experience during the Khmer Rouge, including a massacre on a village which I had witnessed a few days after the graves were freshly buried - the experience remains stuck with you given all the gruesome evidences of blood, hairs still attached to the skin. You can tell a story as good as it gets, but for a listener you can never feel the same or get the complete picture as what you were trying to describe. It would almost be the same to say that you can't really feel what the others are feeling since you are not in his/her shoes. In this case, the corrupt judges and all the big fat cats will never learn nor understand the pain of the land evictees.

Watch the video and take a moment to reflect as those people's lives as theirs are being reduced to practically NOTHING. Haven't we learn anything from the rise and fall of the past regimes for the last 50 years or so? It's all from MISTREATMENT of the people. In Cambodia today, it's on a grandiose scale again from not only political, but also from socio-economic standpoint. The gap is getting a lot wider now and it causes a lot of uncertainty and social distress across the land. People are not sure who will be next on the eviction list? Which companies will come in to evict their lands?

The government's own effort to stray away from democracy has continued to hinder meaningful development in all areas of the Cambodian society. At the rate of contracts signed under land concessions, the need to evict people out will be more frequent. It does not take a Ph.D. to see where the country is really heading to socially, politically and economically. Experiences can pretty much tell a person on the roads where he has walked on and where he will be led to. The government of Cambodia is relatively weak and inefficient. When a Prime Minister has to micro-manage every minor problems of the country, then that country is badly managed. All the institutions are useless. Corruption is like a cancer; it is a ticking time bomb and it continue to spread unmanageably. It corrupts the mind and the soul of everyone involved, rich and poor alike, Cambodian inside as well as those residing abroad.

When one look at a country's development such as ours, he/she needs to take into account the human component, real lives that are being negatively affected since it goes far beyond than just some number of tall buildings of 4-5 star-rated hotels, casinos, fancy restaurants, karaoke bars, massage parlors, and new SUV Landcruisers. There are real costs and many opportunities lost to the nation, especially when we look closely at the fabric of our society today compared to what it was prior to 1970.

While we somehow managed to increase the numbers of buildings, business investments (bad and good), cars, motorcycles, bicycles, perhaps a few more rich individuals than before, but let's also look at the cost of other things as well.

Let's look at the gap between the rich and the poor; the magnitude of corruption (size and scale); the irreversible cost of deforestation factored in the climate change effect; the number of Cambodian beggars and those large number of people who have to seek work outside the country at the mercy of our neighbors; the frequency of land evictions which resulted in large number of displaced persons with no future. The large percentage and still growing number of young women being driven into prostitution, something unheard of during the 60s and the 70s. Then, how many Cambodian women would take risky chance to marry foreigners just to get out of poverty and our of the country altogether? Some were reportedly and severely mistreated, sold and re-sold in South Korea, beating up in Malaysia so on and so forth. The number is staggering, something you have never heard of during the Sihanouk era - the way our Cambodian women are being denigrated is shameful at best. Any country has its low point, but Cambodian women and their dignity are being compromised to the maximum as a result of the Cambodian government's corrupt policies and practices.

There is a complete change in Cambodian mentality not for the better of course - one that I am not at all proud of when you are reaching a point where you cannot really trust anyone anymore, not your relatives, your friends, your physicians, your justice system and your government. Doctors that once trained to save lives have turned to extorting patients for cash. There is a very low sense of morality, pride, compassion and righteousness. Having said that, I am encouraged to see that there are still good Cambodians who have unselfishly taken risk to serve, to promote and advocate Cambodia's interests. Good for them and they deserve all the respect and supports in the world.

So, those are the costs which I think we all need to plug into our calculation in order to see if there is other way to encourage a better policy of development - one that is less harsh on the poor and the country as a whole given its long term implication outlook. Social imbalances, injustices, mistreatment of the needy will lead to some strange unwarranted consequences and history has always reminded all of us not to over indulge ourselves with what we should have learnt from our past. What the Khmer Rouge has taught me is to understand what boil underneath the mistreated people and to be attentive to their despair, as well as to be a bit more humane, fair and kind regardless how little you can be a part of.

Is it too late to change from wrongs to rights?

Cambodia can still advance together, but the government has to change its course of action, policy and direction. A complete halt to all land evictions across the country would be a good start to ensure that people could be moved properly or compensated fairly. The Prime Minister, if he is serious about stability and our people's welfare beings, needs to rid of corruption in its entirety, and the passage of corruption law will need to be modified to reflect that sincerity. The government needs to be more open to public scrutiny and criticism since it is natural that people aren't thinking the same. It needs to be more inclusive in political decision and process in order to secure long term stability and peace among all people. It won't solve all the problems but it will be a tremendous start in advancing the country and everyone involved forward to a more equitable state, poor and rich alike.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Human rights groups call for action on Cambodian evictions

October 16, 2009
ABC Radio Australia

Forced land evictions in Cambodia are increasing in frequency, most taking place in the name of development.

In the latest incident in the country's north-west, more than 100 families were driven off their land and left destitute.

Presenter: Richard Ewart
Speakers: Naly Pilorge, Director of Cambodian human rights group, LICADHO; Sarah Marland, Amnesty International


Tuesday, October 13, 2009

CAMBODIA: An "epidemic" of evictions

Group 78 eviction in central Phnom Penh (Photo: The Phnom Penh Post)

PHNOM PENH, 13 October 2009 (IRIN) - About 700 police and soldiers in riot gear arrived early one morning, waking 58-year-old Teth Neang with a baton and forcing her into a truck.

After they bulldozed her home, they drove her to the outskirts of the capital. She alleges they then dumped her - and 1,000 other families - in an open field, and drove off.

That was three years ago. Since then, Neang has lived in a government-sponsored relocation site at Andong, 20km outside Phnom Penh, without healthcare or a job.

The land she was removed from - Sambok Chap village, in central Phnom Penh - remains barely used by a private developer.

"The developer didn't give me a home like they promised," she told IRIN. "I slept in the field for a week, even in the rain."

With the help of a local Christian missionary, Neang has managed to build a tarpaulin hut but her home is regularly flooded and she has no source of clean drinking water.

"How am I supposed to work here? In Phnom Penh we had jobs and ways of living. Out here, nobody takes care of us."

Going landless

In recent years, NGOs and rights groups have raised concerns over what they say is an epidemic of forced evictions amid spiralling land prices and lax enforcement of laws.

Many evictions make way for hotels and skyscrapers in the rapidly developing capital. In the countryside, evictions are often justified to make way for logging, mining, resorts, casinos or plantations, say NGOs.

Licadho, a Cambodian NGO, said in a May report that 133,000 people, or 10 percent of Phnom Penh's 1.3 million, were believed to have been affected by evictions since 1990.

And more than 250,000 people in 13 provinces have been hit by land-grabbing and forced evictions since 2003, it said.

Meanwhile, rural landlessness has soared from about 13 percent in 1997 to as high as 25 percent in 2007, according to Bridges across Borders Southeast Asia (BABSEA), a regional NGO that works on land rights in Cambodia.

"The mismanagement of state land has negatively impacted [on] the poorest Cambodians most," said David Pred, director of BABSEA, in a statement on 1 October. "Rural and indigenous communities have been deprived of the land on which their lives depend."

NGOs report that many evictees such as Neang are denied basic healthcare and water services in their relocation sites, provided by the government and usually in areas too far from the inner city to find jobs.

Records destroyed

Scores of land documents were destroyed under the Khmer Rouge regime, leaving many Cambodians unable to prove ownership.

The government has justified evictions as part of the country's development plan, and has claimed that residents squat on land illegally. But according to Cambodia's 2001 land law, anyone who has used land for the past five years can claim full title to it.

One World Bank land-titling programme, the Land Management and Administration Project (LMAP), was cancelled by the government in early September. The US$24.3 million project had issued 1.1 million titles since 2002 in an attempt to address Cambodia's rampant landlessness.

Prime Minister Hun Sen said in early September that the move was due to "complicated and difficult conditions" surrounding the project.

However, Annette Dixon, the World Bank's director for Southeast Asia, has said the Bank and government could not agree on a protection mechanism for land disputes.

"The government is making a mistake. The LMAP could be a tremendous boost for poverty reduction, giving people security to their land, which would lead to better planning and investment," Ou Virak, head of the Cambodian Center for Human Rights, a local NGO, told IRIN.

"Land conflict is the one issue that could undermine the current government and cause social unrest," he said.

Controversial development

In perhaps the most controversial case, a politically connected Cambodian developer, Shukaku Inc., is filling in the Boeung Kak lake in northeastern Phnom Penh - one of the city's few natural sites that attracts thousands of tourists each year.

The company has evicted about 900 families from the land since August 2008, and another 20,000 are set to be pushed out, according to BABSEA. Activists say the legality of the project is unclear, since Cambodia's 2001 land law states that lakes are public property and cannot be destroyed.

However, officials have said the land belongs to the state, not families, and that the development is necessary.

"At Boeung Kak lake, we don't evict people because it is state property," Pa Socheat Vong, sub-governor of the Phnom Penh municipality, told IRIN. "We do things according to the law, and we need to build infrastructure and develop Phnom Penh. Foreign NGOs and journalists don't know the truth about it."

As part of the project, Shukaku has entered into a 99-year lease to develop 133ha of the lake and surrounding areas. It reportedly plans to build flats and shopping complexes.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Facing Cambodia's past. Or not.

How is the Khmer Rouge Tribunal playing in the quiet corners of Cambodia?

April 25, 2009
By Karen J. Coates
Special to GlobalPost

Can that really happen again?
Many say no. But not all. “If the people are not educated, if they don’t have human rights, if they don’t have money — yeah, maybe,” says Muny Van Saveth. The Khmer Rouge movement began with a segment of the population that was angry at society’s powerbrokers and money-holders.
PHNOM PENH — The executioner has a new routine. Trailed by guards, he assumes a seat inside the cool, cavernous chambers of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. He faces his judges with the public at his back. A thick glass wall separates the frail, aged man from an audience mostly too young to remember what is commonly called Pol Pot Time. Kaing Guek Eav, alias Duch, stands when called to speak.

“Please leave an open window for me to seek forgiveness,” he tells the court. “Now I am very regretful and very shameful.”

At least 12,000 prisoners died while Duch oversaw the infamous Tuol Sleng torture prison during the 1975 to 1979 Khmer Rouge regime. In those years, the country lost a quarter of its population to murder, disease, overwork and starvation. For the next three months in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Duch will confront what he did.

The world has waited three decades to hear Duch speak — yet remarkably few Cambodians say they are following his trial. “Most people don’t care because they’re busy with their life,” says Ly Bun Hai, a police officer in a fishing village near the ancient Angkor temples.

It’s a common sentiment. This is a country largely populated by farmers and fishermen, many of whom linger near the poverty line; tomorrow’s dinner takes precedence, as it has for more than 30 years. Yet a few Cambodians are urging their compatriots to stare hard and straight into the past — lest history repeat itself.

Nearly 70 percent of Cambodians were born after the Khmer Rouge regime, and many know little or nothing about those years. Khmer Rouge history is not generally taught in Cambodian schools.

A 71-year-old rice farmer named Nga says she recounts stories of Pol Pot Time so that youngsters understand their past. “Sometimes I tell the children, the young generation, about the food we grew behind our house but the Khmer Rouge did not allow us to eat,” she says.

“Today is different, it’s getting better. We have cars, motorbikes, fields to grow food. But some families are still poor, not enough food to eat.”

The battle for daily survival is an ancient thread that binds Cambodians through ages of war and peace.

“I fought the Khmer Rouge,” says a 46-year-old veteran named Sok Samat. He recalls the front lines of a civil war that lasted 19 years beyond the 1970s regime. “I think, when I go to fight the Khmer Rouge, I must shoot. If I don’t shoot, the Khmer Rouge will shoot me. I shot a lot.” These are tough memories for Sok Samat, but he says, “I had to do it to protect the country.”

These days, Sok Samat centers his thoughts on immediate needs of a far different nature. “I think only about being a motor-taxi driver and supporting my family.” In principle, he’s happy about the Tribunal, but he wants “all the people connected to the Khmer Rouge to face trial.”

So far there are five defendants. Does he think his wish is feasible? “Maybe not.”

As court proceedings progress, Chan Soratha, a young college student majoring in journalism, is writing his university thesis. He attempted to survey hundreds of high school teachers about their knowledge of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal — basic questions about the name of the court, the number of former Khmer Rouge in detention, their names, their dates of arrest and the sources from which participants get their information.

“Most lecturers, they refused to answer my questions,” Soratha says, adding that they claimed lack of time, knowledge or desire to respond.

But some teachers told Chan Soratha they envied Duch and his comrades, in a way. Those facing trial received good food, clean bathrooms and decent living quarters “while the victims just stay outside on the street,” they said.

These teachers told Chan Soratha that perhaps society could repeat a Khmer Rouge-style revolution and “have better conditions than those living in the countryside.” Even if the perpetrators are caught, the consequences do not constitute “a punishment.”

Chan Soratha is still analyzing his survey, but the results so far provoke grave thoughts. He grew up hearing the stories of his mother, who lost her father and several siblings during Pol Pot Time, and he chokes when confronted with questions about family history. He never wants to see a repeat of that era, but he says many young Cambodians don’t understand the Khmer Rouge. And if people don’t understand the past, they can’t prevent its recurrence. “Everything happens again and again,” he says philosophically.

This is precisely why the Venerable Muny Van Saveth, a monk and orphanage director across the country at Wat Norea in Battambang, says it is crucial for Cambodia’s children to learn about human rights. “Because we don’t want the second Khmer Rouge.”

Can that really happen again?

Many say no. But not all. “If the people are not educated, if they don’t have human rights, if they don’t have money — yeah, maybe,” says Muny Van Saveth. The Khmer Rouge movement began with a segment of the population that was angry at society’s powerbrokers and money-holders.

Duch has told the tribunal that a pivotal Khmer Rouge policy was “smashing the oppressor class.” Today, Cambodian society is again divided between those with power and money — and those without. “They don’t have the food, they don’t have the land,” the monk Muny Van Saveth says.

"Maybe they are angry.” Again.

Wednesday, April 01, 2009

Cambodia's development benefits whom?

April 01, 2009
By Chak Sopheap
Guest Commentary
UPI Asia Online


Niigata, Japan — Eighteen years after the Paris Peace Agreement that brought relative stability to Cambodia, the country is still suffering from the effects of two decades of the Khmer Rouge dictatorship, civil wars and political conflicts. The Constitution of 1993 allowed the country to strive toward democratic governance, providing a framework for multiparty democracy, a liberal market economy and social development.

Yet, while parts of the economy are making considerable progress, more than 30 percent of the population is still living in extreme poverty. Together with corruption and continued human rights violations – especially the increasing forced evictions and land grabbing under the so-called development claims – there is little hope that Cambodia can move out of poverty. Thus the question arises: For whom is the Cambodian government attempting to achieve its development goals?

The current pursuit of development by the Royal Government of Cambodia has often brought legal abuses and violations of peoples’ rights to housing and development. While the judicial system is corrupt and the state is the main violator of the law, the poor communities are voiceless and powerless.

One example was the eviction of residents of Sambok Chab village on June 6, 2006, which threatened to turn into a serious humanitarian crisis. According to the Cambodian Center for Human Rights, an estimated 6,000 people at a relocation site close to Trapeang Andong village in the Dangkao district were denied the basic rights to food, housing, clean water, public health services and schooling.

More than 1,200 families from Sambok Chab were forcibly relocated to idle rice fields under the supervision of hundreds of armed police and soldiers. Located more than 20 kilometers from their former homes, these people lost their meager means of making a living and many were starving. There was no administration over this site and no security; people dared not leave their small huts for fear that others would take their few belongings.

According to human rights and media observers, on Jan. 24 this year residents of the village of Dey Krahorm were evicted at 2:00 a.m. by over 400 workers from the 7NG Company, a property developer, together with over 300 heavily armed police officers. During this operation, tear gas and heavy machinery including bulldozers were used. Eighteen community members were injured and private property was systematically destroyed.

More than 400 families were reportedly forcibly evicted. Most of them were market stall holders and renters. They were relocated to Damnak Trayeung, 20 kilometers from Phnom Penh, where they set up a makeshift camp on 7NG land beside a road. Some house owners also went to Damnak Trayeung, but others were able to stay temporarily with friends, family or NGOs in Phnom Penh.

The Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights, or LICADHO, reported a lack of facilities at the relocation site including food, water, shelter, mosquito nets and medical facilities. There are no toilets, forcing people to use open fields or unfinished apartment buildings. These unhygienic conditions are obviously harmful to health.

Despite appeals from local and international organizations, as well as pleas from affected residents, evictions have not stopped. Other communities fear it will soon be their turn. In addition to these evictions in urban areas, there have been many cases of land grabbing in the provinces.

The evictions generally follow a pattern with four characteristics: They are violent, using armed forces, tear gas and heavy machinery to drive people out. They follow
illegal procedures, without public consultation, prior announcement or justification. They ignore peoples’ right to private property, taking their homes without providing proper compensation or adequate social infrastructure. They are not in the public interest, as most evictions occur on land contracted to private companies in the name of “development projects,” which often turn out to be shopping malls or multistoried apartment buildings.

The relocated people are not benefitting from such development. Hence, the so-called development projects are merely an excuse to hide the government’s violations of peoples’ rights. This must be stopped.

In fact, there are legal guarantees to housing and development. The right to housing is entrenched in a number of international human rights instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 25), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Article 11), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Article 3), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (Article 14) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Article 27).

Furthermore, the right to development is an inalienable human right. Equal opportunity for development is a privilege of both nations and of individuals who make up nations.

The Cambodian Constitution (Article 31) states that the government shall recognize and respect human rights as stipulated in the United Nations Charter and other declarations, covenants and conventions related to human, women's and children's rights. In addition, the 2001 Cambodian Land Law ensures the right to private ownership of land and prohibits violent, forceful eviction.

The government must abide by its own Constitution and laws.

In principle, people strongly support the government’s development plans and recognize its right to sell land to private companies that can develop it according to the public interest. Yet the government also has the obligation to protect its citizens and their fundamental rights to adequate housing and the means to make a living.

To protect these rights, the government should propose onsite development plans rather than opting to evict poor villagers in the name of city development. If evictions are necessary, the residents should be informed and consulted beforehand. They should be fairly compensated for their property, and relocation sites should include sufficient infrastructure for the people to live in dignity and earn income for themselves and their families.

Most importantly, the government’s master plan must be presented to the public. It is a crucial part of a democratic system for the people to be aware of their country’s development plans.
--
(Chak Sopheap is a graduate student of peace studies at the International University of Japan. She runs a blog, www.sopheapfocus.com, on which she shares her impressions of both Japan and her homeland, Cambodia. She was previously advocacy officer of the Cambodian Center for Human Rights. )

Friday, August 22, 2008

Who will pay most for Cambodia’s development? [-The looting of Cambodia by Hun Sen and his cronies]

PHOTOGRAPH: Villagers’ houses burn during the forced eviction of approximately 105 families at Pram Muoy Village, Mittapheap 4, near Sihanoukville, April 2007. Photograph by David Pred.

22/08/2008
International Construction Review (ICON)
“The World Bank has pointed out that other countries in the region (such as Vietnam) have managed to achieve equitable growth in a manner that benefits society as a whole and contributes to a far more sustainable form of stability than the CPP’s mix of repressive political tactics and short-sighted economic rapaciousness.” - Rhodri Williams, international expert on housing rights
As investors poise to spend billions making Cambodia’s undeveloped coast the next hotspot for sunseekers, human rights groups fear that violent and illegal mass evictions will increase to make way for the resorts and supporting infrastructure.

Land-grabbing is reportedly rife in a country still recovering from the devastation of the Khmer Rouge regime and conflict with neighbouring Vietnam. In February this year Amnesty International estimated that 150,000 people around the country were at risk of forcible eviction as a result of land disputes, seizures and new development projects.

As investors prepare to turn Cambodia’s undeveloped coastline into the next big Asian holiday destination, civil society organisations say the housing and land rights of residents are being trampled on.

The plans for development are significant. A recent example came to light on August 17 when Cambodian conglomerate Royal Group told the Financial Times newspaper it was raising US$2 billion from private investors, together with Hong Kong-based Millennium Group, to develop Koh Rong, an island nearly the size of Hong Kong off the coastal municipality of Sihanoukville.

At nearly 8000 hectares and largely forested, the scope of the development would be huge and would likely require an airport. According to one press report the Cambodian government will not release figures of how many people live on the island, though it has conducted a census there.

The Financial Times also reported that MPDI, a subsidiary of Seng Enterprise, one of Cambodia’s leading construction companies, is working on another US$2bn project with unnamed US, Japanese and Middle Eastern investors to triple the size of Kep, a neglected former French colonial resort. The paper reported that land along a 6km stretch of coastline will be reclaimed and luxury towers and bungalows will house about 10,000 families.

Dan Nicholson, Asia Pacific coordinator for the Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE), told iCON his organization had “grave fears” about the rights of people living in areas pegged for development.

“We hear many reports about proposed tourist developments around the coastline. Some estimates are that 45% of the country has been sold off in various forms to developers, mainly coastal areas and islands.

“Evictions in Cambodia are frequently carried out violently, with no regard to the human rights of those affected, and in violation of Cambodian law. Military police are often used, even though this is illegal. Very often those evicted in fact have legal rights to the land, under the 2001 Land Law, but this is ignored by a corrupt judiciary and government.”

In one case in April last year soldiers and police armed with guns and electric batons violently evicted approximately 105 families from Pram Muoy Village near Sihanoukville to back a claim of ownership by the wife of a local high-ranking official. Houses were burnt to the ground and 18 villagers and two police were injured.

“More than a year later,” Nicholson said, “the community is living along the road, adjacent to their old land, under tarpaulins in conditions resembling an IDP (internally displaced person) camp. The land has been fenced off but remains unused.”

The issue of land ownership in Cambodia is murky at best. Rhodri Williams, an international expert on housing rights, notes that traditionally in Cambodia title was established through cultivating the land, and lost when it fell into disuse. The French, who colonized Cambodia in the mid-1800s, tried to move from use-based to title-based ownership but this didn’t take root much outside the cities.

In 1975 any question of who owned what became academic when the Khmer Rouge launched a programme of wholesale agrarian collectivization that emptied the cities and forced the population to work on farms. The Khmer Rouge fell in 1979 but it wasn’t until the mid 1980s that the government de-collectivised land and property. It then began granting concessions to private companies to exploit natural resources, but it fell to local authorities to administer this process and corruption was rife.

Cambodia’s 300-mile coastline has never been heavily populated but after the mass uprootings during the Khmer Rouge era, in which an estimated fifth of the population was killed, people began settling there because their own towns and villages had been destroyed. They supported themselves by fishing, subsistence farming or running small businesses.

In the 90s the central government in Phnom Penh designated the entire coast and its islands as State Public Land that could not be bartered or developed.

According to an article in the Guardian newspaper (See “Country for sale”, 26th April 2008), by 2006 these coastal communities had schools, political representation, and many householders even had papers, stamped by the Sihanoukville governor, Say Hak, which guaranteed them the permanent right to stay under the 2001 Land Law.

But in July 2007, Cambodia’s Prime Minister Hun Sen, of the Cambodian Peoples Party (CPP), changed the designation of the southern islands so they could be sold.

By March this year,” wrote the authors of the Guardian article, “virtually all Cambodia's accessible and sandy coast was in private hands, either Cambodian or foreign. Those who lived or worked there were turfed out - some jailed, others beaten, virtually all denied meaningful compensation. The deals went unannounced; no tenders or plans were ever officially published. All that was known was that more than £1,000m in foreign finance found its way into the country in 2007, a 1,500% increase over the previous four years.”

Dan Nicholson of COHRE told iCON that under international law, evictions should only be carried out in exceptional circumstances, and when all feasible alternatives have been explored with the communities. He said that where evictions are justified there must be adequate consultation and notice and the evictions must be humane. Evicted communities should be compensated for their losses, and provided with adequate alternative housing.

Although Cambodia has ratified the major international human rights treaties, there is currently no law regulating eviction here,” he said. “Domestic laws are in any case frequently ignored by government, police and courts to push through development projects, including tourist development.

“Everyone can see the potential for Cambodia to develop a stronger tourist industry. However, it is essential that this doesn't happen at the expense of the housing and land rights of local communities. Current signs are not good.”

Cambodia lost no time issuing an official response to both the Guardian article and the Amnesty International report. In a letter to the Guardian, Cambodia’s ambassador to the UK, Hor Nambora, accused the paper of trying to discredit the ruling CPP in the run-up to July’s general election, in which Prime Minister Hun Sen was returned to office.

The ambassador (see www.cambodianembassy.org.uk) did not refute the article’s specific assertions but recalled the country’s difficult past and said the government doesn’t ignore “the tactics used by some foreign companies”. He went on to claim that “All applications to buy land are carefully scrutinised by the Cambodian Investment Board which is committed to ensuring that the rights of the Cambodian people are not infringed.”

To Amnesty International, Hor Nambora wrote countering that the government planned to distribute concession land to some 10,000 poor families in the provinces and cities as part of a Land Allocation for Social and Economic Development (LASED) Project for 2008.

He also said Cambodia is committed to improving governance and is working with the World Bank, the EU, UK and Japan, who together provided US$70m to help reform public financial management, private sector development, natural resource and land management from 2007 to 2010.

However expert Rhodri Williams told iCON that this may be just a smokescreen.

“The problem,” he said, “is that the international cooperation tends to focus on lengthy drafting processes for laws and by-laws and programs, et cetera, that are so rarely implemented on the ground that it is hard to avoid the inference that they are little more than a diversion.

“Meanwhile, development is clearly going on, but taking place in a manner that tends to be to the detriment of all but the rich and connected.”

He added: “The World Bank has pointed out that other countries in the region (such as Vietnam) have managed to achieve equitable growth in a manner that benefits society as a whole and contributes to a far more sustainable form of stability than the CPP’s mix of repressive political tactics and short-sighted economic rapaciousness.”

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Hun Sen's prophecy sees the daylight: Farmers revolution takes root in Siem Reap province

Clash between villagers and cops in Siem Reap province

14 August 2007
By Sav Yuth
Radio Free Asia

Translated from Khmer by Socheata

About 100 villagers from Kauk Run village, Sorsor Sdam commune, Puok district, Siem Reap province, clashed with a group of cops blocking their road on Tuesday 14 August, in order to prevent the villagers from traveling to the provincial city to protest about their land dispute.

A large group of villagers decided to abandon their tractors, and continue their travel by foot. The villagers said that at least 4 villagers were slightly injured during the clash with the cops, but that they are determined to reach the provincial city to meet government officials and Members of Parliament to seek their help in the release of 2 villagers arrested by the court, and also to seek a resolution in a land dispute involving 4.5-hectare of land which they accused the village chief and 8 village group leaders of grabbing and turning it into their private properties.

The group of villagers said: “The cops beat me up and I fell down on my face. We come here to find people to get justice for us in this land problem. This common plot of land belongs to all the villagers in the Kauk Run village, to turn the land into private properties of 7 people is not fair, we do not agree with it.”

On Tuesday morning, the villagers have gathered in front of the liaison office of the National Assembly and the Senate, and they moved on to the Siem Reap provincial court to demand the release of the 2 villagers arrested.

Bun Tharith, the cabinet chief of the the Siem Reap provincial office, said that his office sent an urgent letter, today, to the Siem Reap court, asking it to revisit the release of the 2 villagers. Regarding the land dispute issue, the provincial office will set up a committee to look into this matter.

Bun Tharith said: “We ask that they (2 villagers arrested) are released out of jail today, but this is the court’s prerogative. Regarding this plot of land, we will continue to look into it, and we will find a reasonable resolution because, in the past, the Ministry of Interior issued a directive to that effect.”

Vong Kosal, an investigator for the Licadho human rights organization, who is following this case, said that the jailing of the 2 villagers was done because of the land dispute, and the court decided to jail the pair for criminal destruction of someone else’s properties, but he also said that the court decision was taken in very big rush. Therefore, the case should be revisited again.

On 09 August, two villagers were arrested and accused of destroying other people’s properties, following a violent dispute between about 100 people and the village chief and the village group leaders.

According to documents obtained, the dispute on the 4.5-hectare of land started since 2004. Back then, the villagers have accused the village chief and the village group leaders of appropriating for themselves common land belonging to the village. On 26 March, the Ministry of Interior issued a decision to surrender the land to the village chief and some other 8 village group leaders, the decision was based on the fact that the land-grabbers have occupied this plot of land for several years now.

Sunday, August 12, 2007

Say Hak, the black heart governor of Sihanoukville, turns a blind eye to the intense hardships faced by 92 evicted families

92 families in Sihanoukville are facing hardhsip

11 August 2007
By Sok Serei
Radio Free Asia

Translated from Khmer by KI-Media

92 Cambodian families living in Village No. 4, O’Tress commune, Stung Hav district, Sihanoukville, who lost their shelters, complained that they are currently facing tremendous hardships from almost daily storms, severe lack of food, and lack of medicine.

55-year-old Keo Kea, one of the representatives of the 92 families who lost their shelters and who are now forced to live along the beach without any tent and food, told RFA that on Friday night, a strong storm hit the area and the families have no shelters and they are facing extreme hardships.

Keo kea said: “We are facing severe hardships from the storms, and we don’t have food, we lack rice, and the majority of us have nothing to eat at all. As far as medicine for those who are sick, some don’t have it. Most importantly, the main problem is the lack of shelters and the hard living condition.”

45-year-old Suong Touch, another representative of the 92 families, said: “The storm was fierce, and the sea waves were very strong, it rained and we couldn’t sleep at all. And at night time, they come to threaten us, they take down our tents in the middle of the night, we were trembling with fear and we went to hide under people’s houses. Now, we do not dare live near the beach, we can come back only during day time.”

According to an investigator of a human rights organization based in Sihanoukville, the Sihanoukville authority seems not to care about these families at all, it didn’t help provide food or resolve the shelter problem for the people at all.

Regarding this issue, Say Hak, the governor of the Sihanoukville municipality, reacted by saying that that his authority cannot provide any help because these families are under accusation by the court. Say Hak accused the families as an illegal group which occupy lands belonging to others.

Say Hak reacted by saying: “This is a court case, it is not in the hand of the authority or the local authority anymore. Where do they live now? They went to live on other people’s land. When were these lands theirs?

The 92 families used to live in Village No. 4, O’Tress commune, Stung Hav district, Sihanoukville. The Sihanoukville authority conducted an operation to destroy their homes, and all of their crops at the end of July. The operation followed a land dispute pitting the families against Sar Soeng, the army commander of Sihanoukville , and his Chamroeun Cheat company. The extent of the land in dispute is about 130-hectare, and the dispute started since 2005.

Pung Chiv Kek, President of the Licadho organization, said: “This is the government duty, it cannot afford not to acknowledge this issue. It is his (Say Hak) duty and the duty of the government to look for a mean to provide housing and sufficient food to these people. Also, when these families are sick, they should receive medical service help also.”

Earlier, the Cambodian Independent Committee against Corruption sent a letter to the Ministry of Interior to complaint about Say Hak, accusing this (CPP) governor of using violence to grab 16-hectare of lands belonging to 100 families living in Mittapheap district, Sihanoukville, on 20 April 2007.

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

ADB: Relative inequality has increased sharply in Cambodia [- Hun Sen's predicted farmers revolution in progress?]

Inequality rising across Asia, ADB says

08-08-2007
Reuters

BEIJING: Inequality is rising across most of Asia, partly as a result of globalisation favouring the well educated and penalising the less skilled, the Asian Development Bank said on Aug 8.

The Manila-based lender said its findings did not mean Asia should turn its back on integration into the world economy or on market reforms.

Rather, governments needed to pursue a range of policies to reverse the trend of the rich getting richer faster than the poor, the ADB said in a report released in Beijing.

To lift the incomes of the poor, the ADB called for more public investment in agriculture; better job opportunities in the rural sector and informal urban economy; and a switch in spending from tertiary to basic education.

Alluding to the power wielded by Asia's rich elites, the report also said there was a need to recognise and limit "the very real danger that concentrations of income and wealth pose for social cohesion and growth-promoting policies and institutions".

The ADB's report, "Key Indicators 2007", acknowledged the formidable challenge of crafting policies that spread income in a way that does not sap growth.

"But the need for redistributive policies will not go away -- especially if increasing inequalities turn out to be an enduring feature of developing Asia over the next two or three decades," the ADB said.

Inequality had certainly been a salient feature of the region's development in the past decade or so, the report said.

Relative inequality has increased sharply in Nepal, China, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Laos.

In China, it is now at a level more usually associated with Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa. The country's Gini coefficient stood at about 0.47 in 2004, up from around 0.40 in 1993, according to the ADB.

In a society where income was perfectly distributed, the Gini coefficient would be zero; if all the income was concentrated in the hands of one person, it would be 1. A reading over 0.4 is considered by economists to be a cause for concern.

Absolute inequality -- measured by actual dollar differences in incomes -- has also increased virtually everywhere, with the richest 20% of Asians enjoying much bigger increases in living standards than the poorest 20%.

This trend was evident even in countries such as Indonesia and Malaysia where relative inequality had declined, the report said.

Inequality to some extent is a natural part of development. Not everyone can get rich at the same time. Wealth trickles down.

But the ADB said globalisation was playing a major role in accentuating inequality by creating more opportunities for the mobile professional at the expense of the unskilled labourer.

"Widening differentials in earnings of the college-educated vis-a-vis less-educated individuals appears to be the single most important observable factor accounting for increasing inequality," the ADB said.

Friday, July 13, 2007

Cambodia's cowboy capitalism

Jul 13, 2007
By Shawn W Crispin
Asia Times (Hong Kong)


BANGKOK - Despite his rough and ready reputation, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen has presided over an extraordinary transformation of the country's once war-torn, now booming local economy, marking Southeast Asia's latest successful transition from a centrally planned to market-driven economy.

But as Cambodia's capitalist reforms enter a crucial new phase - one where multilateral organization economists say that to sustain fast growth, economic benefits must be more equitably distributed - it's altogether unclear whether Hun Sen and his Cambodian People's Party-led government are up to the egalitarian task.

Over the past three years, Cambodia's gross domestic product has expanded at double-digit growth rates, averaging a breakneck 11.4% per annum. Garment exports, the economy's top foreign-currency earner, accounting for nearly 14% of total GDP, grew by 20% last year, despite predictions that Cambodian producers would start to lose a substantial market share to China and Vietnam.

Foreign direct investment touched a record high US$475 million last year and, in a show of fiscal confidence last weekend, the government unveiled a new $26 million parliament building, which is about 10 times the size of the previous complex. Meanwhile, hopes are running high that recent discoveries of big new oil and gas deposits will translate into a multibillion-dollar boon and by as early as 2010 transform the country into a net fuel exporter - potentially one of Asia's largest.

Monetary authorities have successfully reined in inflation, which on average galloped well over 50% per annum throughout the 1990s, to less than 3% last year, and policymakers are now feeling emboldened enough to talk about "de-dollarizing" the economy in a nationalistic bid to shore up the local currency, the riel. International credit-rating agencies, including Standard & Poor's and Moody's, recently issued their first sovereign ratings for the country, in anticipation of new stock- and bond-market launches in 2009.

Hun Sen, a former communist guerrilla and currently Southeast Asia's longest-serving elected leader, deserves a fair measure of credit for the progress. In the state-sanctioned press, he's frequently seen presiding over the opening of new roads, bridges and schools, putting his personal populist mark on public-funded investments.

His deputies have recently taken to portraying him as one of the region's vanguard economic reformers, who began dumping communism for capitalism through limited land-ownership reforms in the mid-1980s. In advance of the 1991 Paris Peace Agreement, which ushered in United Nations-sponsored elections and a new power-sharing government, Hun Sen introduced full-scale land reforms, slashed price controls, privatized state enterprises and, to a degree, liberalized foreign investments.

More recently, Hun Sen has in the main stayed the course of a World Bank-designed market-reform strategy, which aims to boost the private sector and move the economy away from its age-old reliance on subsistence agriculture. That has included substantial policy reforms aimed at improving the investment climate and trade facilitation, including recent automation of traditionally corruption-prone customs-related services.

Rich man, poor man

Still, there are contrary indicators that Cambodia's emerging brand of wild and wooly capitalism is unevenly - and in instances perhaps illegally - benefiting the politically connected few at the great expense of the indigent masses.

A recent World Bank research report shows that robust economic growth over the past decade has helped to reduce the national poverty rate from 47% to 35% over the 10-year period spanning 1994-2004. Over that same period, however, average consumption per capita rose a mere 8% for the bottom fifth of the wage-earning population, while rising a whopping 45% for the top tier.

Where land ownership was seen as equitable after the 1989 land reforms, now levels of inequality in landholding and landlessness are among the highest in Asia, due to recent government policies in favor of large-scale land concessions - not to mention increasing state-backed land grabs from the poor. Lightly populated Cambodia, remarkably, now ranks worse than Malthusian dread-ridden India in this category.

The World Bank report also warned that, in general, high levels of inequality contribute to market failures and reduced investment, give rise to institutions that favor the rich over the poor and, over prolonged periods, often result in social and political instability. Those dire predictions are arguably already coming due, seen in the recent rash of land grabbling, where international rights groups such as Human Rights Watch estimate that tens of thousands of people have been forcibly evicted to make way for state projects and big plantation agriculture.

More damaging, however, were the allegations in a recent investigative report titled "Cambodia's Family Trees" issued by UK-based environmental watchdog Global Witness. The globally respected outfit alleged that senior army, police and government officials, many close to Hun Sen, including the head of his personal bodyguard unit, had profited hugely from illegal logging activities.

The report also claimed that a "kleptocratic elite" - including members of Hun Sen's direct family - were complicit in exploiting large swaths of officially protected forest lands. The report notably mentioned by name Hun Sen's wife as benefiting from the alleged illicit trade. For its part, the government banned the publication, issued a blanket denial, and threatened journalists who followed up the allegations.

One Radio Free Asia reporter was forced to flee the country after he received an anonymous death threat related to his reports, which corroborated some of Global Witness' findings. He was the second RFA reporter to flee the country this year because of concerns about possible government reprisals over critical news coverage. Further, Hun Sen refused in May to meet with the UN special representative on human rights for Cambodia, Yash Ghai, who had conducted investigations into allegations of state-backed land grabs.

Such statistical and investigative findings explain why - despite Hun Sen's recent consolidation of political power and his pivotal role in accelerating economic growth - foreign and local observers still have big doubts about his style of governance. For instance, last year international corruption monitoring group Transparency International rated Cambodia 151 out of 163 nations it ranked in its global government corruption index.

A more recent Indochina Research Limited public-opinion poll found that 88% of Cambodians feel that growing inequality in wealth is a pressing issue, while a World Bank survey released this week found that perceptions of Cambodia's government effectiveness, regulatory quality and control of corruption all declined from 2005 to 2006. Cambodia is no doubt growing, and growing fast, but increasingly the perception is that the benefits are only gushing up and not trickling down.

Shawn W Crispin is Asia Times Online's Southeast Asia editor. He may be reached at swcrispin@atimes.com.

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

Despite Warnings, No End to Land-Grabbing in Cambodia

A Cambodian man looks on from a small shelter at a slum-village in down town Phnom Penh, 10 June 2007

By Rory Byrne
Voice of America
Phnom Penh
03 July 2007


Soaring property prices have resulted in an explosion of land-grabbing in Cambodia, leaving tens of thousands of people destitute. A recent United Nations report accuses the Cambodian authorities of allowing a wealthy elite to illegally grab land, but the government denies the accusation and says it is trying to stop the practice. Rory Byrne reports from Phnom Penh.

The report by the U.N.'s Rapporteur on Human Rights in Cambodia says that land-grabbing has "a devastating impact" on the poor. It says that almost 15 percent of the land in Cambodia is now owned by a tiny elite.

The roots of the problem can be traced back to the Khmer Rouge, who ended private land ownership in the late 1970s. After the Khmer Rouge were ousted in 1979, many people settled on land without having title to it. Disputes arose when the economy started growing and land became valuable. Rights activists and small farmers say developers and influential Cambodians are ousting poor people from land they have lived on for decades.

The government says many disputes arise because the poor sell their land and then illegally occupy state-owned or private property. Chum Bun Rong is head of land-dispute resolution at Cambodia's National Land Authority.

"They have a problem of a lack of money for spending so they have to sell their land and after that they become, you see, the squatter," said Rong. "They live somewhere - sometimes they live on public land. They stay, or build houses, along the sidewalks or the roads, the main road in the city sometimes, but those lands belong to the state."

Yeng Virek is the executive director of the Community Legal Education Center, which provides legal aid to victims of land-grabbing. He says the government, which sometimes expels people from the land they live on, ignores the rights of the poor in the interests of development:

"Sometimes the authorities just claim the area as state property, or they need the area for beautification of the city, for example, and, on that ground, they evict people," he said.

The government set up a commission to settle land disputes, but critics say it is mired in bureaucracy and corruption. Unregulated development is bad for Cambodia says Kek Galabru, who heads the local human rights group, Licadho.

"I understand that the government would like to develop the country but [to] develop a country you have to do [it] in a manner that everyone is happy - not only the company [are] happy and poor people, vulnerable people, are unhappy," said Galabru. "So that kind of development I think is very dangerous for the country."

Prime Minister Hun Sen has repeatedly warned against land-grabbing, but Kek Galabru says there has been little improvement:

"When you listen to the statement[s] of the government, especially of [the] Prime Minister, it seems that he understand[s] the importance of the issue because he always threat[ens] his ministers saying, 'if you don't solve this problem, it will be a big problem in Cambodia - maybe we are going to have instability' - he said, but I don't know why it didn't work," he said. "Where is the obstacle? What level? As it's not transparent, we don't know why the national authority cannot solve the problem."

Dispossessed families are often moved to makeshift camps, many without clean water, sanitation or medical facilities. Kek Galabru says losing their land leaves people unable to feed their families.

"Eighty percent of Cambodian people, they live in the rural area and they rely on the land for agriculture, so if you take the land from them it means they have no way to solve the problem of living," sadi Galabru. "Without land, you condemn them to a death."

Andouang is a relocation camp about 20 kilometers from Phnom Penh. It houses about 1,200 families evicted from Sambok Chap, on Phnom Penh's riverside. Most are still waiting for new plots they were promised last year. Conditions at the camp are bad, with bamboo or plastic-sheeting providing little shelter from the monsoon rains. Some residents suffer from malnutrition and disease.

"Living conditions are very bad because I have no way of making money here for my family - I have four children," said Sony, who has been living at the camp for over a year. "My husband has disappeared and has not come back for me. I have no proper shelter - only a plastic sheet, and no income at all."

Denty came to Andouang with his wife and baby last year. After losing his home, Denty lost his job because he cannot afford the cost of traveling to work.

"Living conditions are terrible. I got very sick after I came here - my wife is sick also - and I was not able to work construction any more," he said. "When I came here we had no proper shelter - only a plastic sheet - and we could not get adequate medical treatment. My wife could not give breast milk to our baby anymore, and I didn't have any money to buy milk to feed the baby."

The government says it is doing what it can to settle land disputes and to help the landless. But officials say they need foreign aid to help prepare land titles and create a computer system to maintain records.

Kek Galabru says that political will is needed if the issue of land-grabbing is to be solved.

"First of all, strong political will from all the leaders, all the ones who have the power to solve the problem. And then, second point, I think we have to empower the existing institution[s]. And implement the land law. Another thing also - the problem of [the] judiciary," he said. "The judicial system is really weak, not independent, so drastic reform of that judiciary is also very important."

Earlier this month, Prime Minister Hun Sen told aid donors he would take steps to distribute illegally seized lands to the landless and to help with titling. But with Cambodia's economy expanding at about 10 percent a year, the value of land will continue to rise. Experts say that, without strong measures to prevent it, the problem will continue to grow.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Another (empty?) promise from Hun Sen: Cambodian PM vows to narrow wealth gap

June 12, 2007
Cambodian PM vows to narrow wealth gap

The expanding gap of living standard between the rural and the urban people could cause instability and this situation must be dealt with immediately, said Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen on Tuesday.

"The government expresses the concern for inequity development of the country and it will make the country unstable," he said while launching the World Bank's report called "Sharing Growth: Equity and Development in Cambodia."

The kingdom has enjoyed political and macro economic stability for years and doesn't want instability because it knew the taste in the past years of turmoil, he said.

"Some 80 percent of the Cambodian people live in rural areas, almost unable to join the labor force while the economic growth rate reached nine percent in average since 1999 due to the development of tourism, garment and construction," he said.

Only land and agricultural sectors can help develop the rural areas with sustainability and reduce poverty, so the government will invest more in micro-finance to develop the public sectors to renovate the rural infrastructure and reduce poverty in rural areas, he said.

"Development of rural economy is the key for poverty reduction and the government has tried to prepare the plans for developing rural economy through providing jobs in small and medium enterprise and building relation between city and remote areas," he added.

According to the World Bank, in 2004, only 20 percent of the workers in Cambodia were in paid jobs while the rest were self- employed, and only half of the labor force were in formal economy.

Currently, some 35 percent of the 14 million Cambodian people live below the poverty line.

Source: Xinhua