 |
Richard H. Solomon |
US Department of State Bulletin / Nov, 1989
Source:FindArticles.com
Richard H. Solomon
Transcript
Address before an international symposium sponsored by The Los Angeles Times, the Times Mirror Company, and the Asia Society in Los Angeles on September 8, 1989. Mr. Solomon is Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs. It's a pleasure and honor to join here with friends and colleagues in this impressive display of interest in Indochina. It is a telling sign of the times that this gathering is taking place now and here in Los Angeles, one of the great cities of the Pacific rim.
Contemporary Asia's economic dynamism and political ferment highlight global transformations that are shaping the world we will know in the 21st century. Secretary of State Baker has succinctly characterized these trends as an increasingly integrated global economy based on an open market trading system sparked by spectacular technological change, the failure of communism as an economic and political system, and a worldwide trend toward democracy and free enterprise.
Would that the realization of these trends was without conflict and evenly accomplished Yet, as we know, development is an arduous process characterized by conflict, uneven growth, and setbacks as a new era strains to break through the constraints of the old. Asia's explosive economic growth and political ferment have yielded dramatic successes, as in the Philippines and South Korea, where intense social pressures shattered authoritarian political orders and brought forth democratic reform. Yet in Burma, and more recently in China, we have seen how uncertain and painful the rites of passage to a new era can be.
What do these forces for change mean for Indochina? Does Vietnam's announced intention to end its occupation of Cambodia signal a major shift in policy? Or do old suspicions, old ambitions, and old ideologies still hold sway? The inconclusive results of the recent Paris conference on Cambodia leave us with an ambiguous picture of the future. Progress on the international aspects of a settlement contrasts with the inability, thus far, to construct a process of internal political reconciliation.
Tonight, I would like to share with you some thoughts on the prospects for peace in Indochina and about U.S. policy toward the region.